Literature DB >> 23864289

Matched survival data in a co-twin control design.

Mette Gerster1, Mia Madsen, Per Kragh Andersen.   

Abstract

When using the co-twin control design for analysis of event times, one needs a model to address the possible within-pair association. One such model is the shared frailty model in which the random frailty variable creates the desired within-pair association. Standard inference for this model requires independence between the random effect and the covariates. We study how violations of this assumption affect inference for the regression coefficients and conclude that substantial bias may occur. We propose an alternative way of making inference for the regression parameters by using a fixed-effects models for survival in matched pairs. Fitting this model to data generated from the frailty model provides consistent and asymptotically normal estimates of regression coefficients, no matter whether the independence assumption is met.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23864289     DOI: 10.1007/s10985-013-9256-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal        ISSN: 1380-7870            Impact factor:   1.588


  5 in total

Review 1.  Classical twin studies and beyond.

Authors:  Dorret Boomsma; Andreas Busjahn; Leena Peltonen
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Rethinking twins and environments: possible social sources for assumed genetic influences in twin research.

Authors:  Allan V Horwitz; Tami M Videon; Mark F Schmitz; Diane Davis
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2003-06

3.  Between- and within-cluster covariate effects in the analysis of clustered data.

Authors:  J M Neuhaus; J D Kalbfleisch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Social inequality and incidence of and survival from breast cancer in a population-based study in Denmark, 1994-2003.

Authors:  Kathrine Carlsen; Mette Terp Høybye; Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton; Anne Tjønneland
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  Does the association of education with breast cancer replicate within twin pairs? A register-based study on Danish female twins.

Authors:  M Madsen; P K Andersen; M Gerster; A-M Nybo Andersen; K Christensen; M Osler
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 7.640

  5 in total
  6 in total

1.  This special issue contains several papers on clinical trials, exemplifying Ross Prentice's influence. Preface.

Authors:  Jianwen Cai; Li Hsu
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: are we doing the right thing?

Authors:  Basile Njei
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2014-01

3.  Social and economic consequences of alcohol use disorder: a longitudinal cohort and co-relative analysis.

Authors:  K S Kendler; H Ohlsson; K J Karriker-Jaffe; J Sundquist; K Sundquist
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 7.723

4.  Trends in esophageal cancer survival in United States adults from 1973 to 2009: A SEER database analysis.

Authors:  Basile Njei; Thomas R McCarty; John W Birk
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.029

5.  Cancer in twin pairs discordant for smoking: The Nordic Twin Study of Cancer.

Authors:  Tellervo Korhonen; Jacob Hjelmborg; Jennifer R Harris; Signe Clemmensen; Hans-Olov Adami; Jaakko Kaprio
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 7.316

6.  Potentially modifiable blood triglyceride levels by the control of conventional risk factors.

Authors:  Bumjo Oh; Joohon Sung; Sohyun Chun
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 3.876

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.