Literature DB >> 27917237

Review of Upper Extremity Nerve Transfer in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.

Sarah A Cain1, Andreas Gohritz2, Jan Fridén3, Natasha van Zyl4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Several nerve transfers have now been successfully performed for upper limb reanimation in tetraplegia. This study was performed to review the use of nerve transfers for upper limb reanimation in tetraplegia.
METHODS: Medline and Embase (1950 to February 11, 2015) were searched using a search strategy designed to include any studies that reported cases of nerve transfer in persons with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI).
RESULTS: A total of 103 manuscripts were selected initially and full-text analysis produced 13 studies with extractable data. Of these manuscripts, 10 reported single cases and 3 reported case series. Eighty-nine nerve transfers have been performed in 57 males and 2 females with a mean age of 34 years. The mean SCI level was C6 (range: C5-7), time to surgery post-SCI was 19.9 months (range: 4.1-156 months), and follow-up time was 18.2 months (range: 3-60 months). All case reports recorded a Medical Research Council (MRC) score of 3 or 4 for recipient muscle power, but two early case series reported more variable results.
CONCLUSION: This review documents the current status of nerve transfer surgery for upper limb reanimation in tetraplegia and summarizes the functional results in 59 cases with 89 nerve transfers performed, including 15 cases of double-nerve transfer and 1 case of triple-nerve transfer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  nerve transfer; quadriplegia; spinal cord injury; tetraplegia

Year:  2015        PMID: 27917237      PMCID: PMC5023083          DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1558427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj        ISSN: 1749-7221


  27 in total

Review 1.  Nerve transfers in the forearm and hand.

Authors:  Justin M Brown; Susan E Mackinnon
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.907

2.  SCIM--spinal cord independence measure: a new disability scale for patients with spinal cord lesions.

Authors:  A Catz; M Itzkovich; E Agranov; H Ring; A Tamir
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Response.

Authors:  Susan E Mackinnon; Wilson Z Ray
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research.

Authors:  R C Lyle
Journal:  Int J Rehabil Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.479

5.  Recovery of simple hand function in tetraplegia patients following transfer of the musculo-cutaneous nerve into the median nerve.

Authors:  J Kiwerski
Journal:  Paraplegia       Date:  1982-08

6.  Transfer of supinator motor branches to the posterior interosseous nerve to reconstruct thumb and finger extension in tetraplegia: case report.

Authors:  Jayme A Bertelli; Cristiano P Tacca; Marcos F Ghizoni; Paulo Roberto Kechele; Marcos Antonio Santos
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.230

7.  Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population.

Authors:  Kim D Anderson
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.269

8.  Acceptable benefits and risks associated with surgically improving arm function in individuals living with cervical spinal cord injury.

Authors:  K D Anderson; J Fridén; R L Lieber
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 2.772

9.  Outcomes of single-stage grip-release reconstruction in tetraplegia.

Authors:  Carina Reinholdt; Jan Fridén
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 2.230

10.  Nerve transfers for the restoration of hand function after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Susan E Mackinnon; Andrew Yee; Wilson Z Ray
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  6 in total

1.  Combining nerve and tendon transfers in tetraplegia: a proposal of a new surgical strategy based on literature review.

Authors:  Paolo Titolo; Federico Fusini; Chiara Arrigoni; Gianluca Isoardo; Luigi Conforti; Stefano Artiaco; Davide Ciclamini; Monica Sicari; Bruno Battiston
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-12-12

2.  Spontaneous Motor Recovery after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Issues for Nerve Transfer Surgery Decision Making.

Authors:  Jana Dengler; John D Steeves; Armin Curt; Munish Mehra; Christine B Novak; Ida K Fox
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 2.473

3.  Donor activation focused rehabilitation approach to hand closing nerve transfer surgery in individuals with cervical level spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Lorna C Kahn; Adam G Evans; Elspeth J R Hill; Ida K Fox
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2022-04-29

Review 4.  Nerve and Tendon Transfer Surgery in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Individualized Choices to Optimize Function.

Authors:  Ida K Fox; Amanda K Miller; Catherine M Curtin
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2018

Review 5.  Upper Limb Reconstruction in Tetraplegic Patients: A Primer for Spinal Cord Injury Specialists.

Authors:  Siew Khei Liew; Bum Jin Shim; Hyun Sik Gong
Journal:  Korean J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-10-28

6.  Morphology of Donor and Recipient Nerves Utilised in Nerve Transfers to Restore Upper Limb Function in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Aurora Messina; Natasha Van Zyl; Michael Weymouth; Stephen Flood; Andrew Nunn; Catherine Cooper; Jodie Hahn; Mary P Galea
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2016-09-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.