Literature DB >> 28569365

Risk-adjusted procedure tailoring leads to uniformly low complication rates in ventral and incisional hernia repair: a propensity score analysis and internal validation of classification criteria.

U A Dietz1, A Fleischhacker2, S Menzel3, U Klinge4, C Jurowich3, K Haas5, P Heuschmann5, C-T Germer3, A Wiegering6,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The usual approach in hernia surgery is to select the ideal repair method independent of the patient's characteristics. In the present study, we change the approach to ask which technique is best for the individual patient`s risk profile. For this, two criteria are important: does the patient need reconstruction of the abdominal wall? or does he or she need treatment of symptoms without being exposed to unnecessarily high perioperative risks?
METHODS: In a heuristic selection procedure, 486 consecutive patients were classified according to their characteristics as low-risk or high-risk for postoperative complications. Low-risk patients preferentially underwent open abdominal wall reconstruction with mesh (MFR + mesh), high-risk patients mainly a bridging-mesh procedure, either by laparoscopic (Lap.-IPOM) or open approach (Open-IPOM). Primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative complications. Secondary outcome was the recurrence-free interval. The propensity score was used for covariate adjustment analyzing recurrence rate as well as postoperative complications using Cox regression and logistic regression, respectively.
RESULTS: Comparison of all surgical procedures showed risk factors had no independent influence on occurrence of complications (p = 0.110). Hernial gap width was an independent factor for occurrence of complications (p = 0.002). Propensity score adjustment revealed Lap.-IPOM to have a significantly higher recurrence rate than MFR + mesh (HR 2.367, 95% CI 1.123-4.957, p = 0.024). Three or more risk factors were protective against recurrence (HR 0.454, 95% CI 0.221-0.924, p = 0.030). In the univariate Cox regression analysis for recurrence, age >50 years was a protective prognostic factor (HR 0.412, 95% CI 0.245-0.702, p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: The classification criteria applied were internally validated. The heuristic algorithm ensured that patients at high-risk of complications did not have a higher perioperative complication rate than patients at low-risk.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hernia mesh; Heuristic; IPOM; Incisional hernia; Propensity score; Retromuscular; Ventral hernia

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28569365     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-017-1622-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  34 in total

1.  Patient reported outcomes after incisional hernia repair-establishing the ventral hernia recurrence inventory.

Authors:  Rebeccah B Baucom; Jenny Ousley; Irene D Feurer; Gloria B Beveridge; Richard A Pierce; Michael D Holzman; Kenneth W Sharp; Benjamin K Poulose
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 2.  Proper mesh overlap is a key determinant in hernia recurrence following laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair.

Authors:  K LeBlanc
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2015-07-05       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 3.  Laparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repair.

Authors:  Stefan Sauerland; Maren Walgenbach; Brigitte Habermalz; Christoph M Seiler; Marc Miserez
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-03-16

4.  Quality of Life and Surgical Outcome 1 Year After Open and Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair: PROLOVE: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Peder Rogmark; Ulf Petersson; Sven Bringman; Emmanuel Ezra; Johanna Österberg; Agneta Montgomery
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair in obese patients: a long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Dvir Froylich; Miriam Segal; Adam Weinstein; Kamal Hatib; Eitan Shiloni; David Hazzan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Substantial variation among hernia experts in the decision for treatment of patients with incisional hernia: a descriptive study on agreement.

Authors:  D Kokotovic; I Gögenur; F Helgstrand
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-12-03       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Importance of recurrence rating, morphology, hernial gap size, and risk factors in ventral and incisional hernia classification.

Authors:  U A Dietz; M S Winkler; R W Härtel; A Fleischhacker; A Wiegering; C Isbert; Ch Jurowich; P Heuschmann; C-T Germer
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 8.  [Overview and evolving strategies of ventral hernia repair].

Authors:  M S Winkler; E Gerharz; U A Dietz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Does ventral hernia defect length, width, or area predict postoperative quality of life? Answers from a prospective, international study.

Authors:  Blair Andrew Wormer; Amanda L Walters; Joel F Bradley; Kristopher B Williams; Victor B Tsirline; Vedra A Augenstein; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 2.192

10.  Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS)-part 1.

Authors:  R Bittner; J Bingener-Casey; U Dietz; M Fabian; G S Ferzli; R H Fortelny; F Köckerling; J Kukleta; K Leblanc; D Lomanto; M C Misra; V K Bansal; S Morales-Conde; B Ramshaw; W Reinpold; S Rim; M Rohr; R Schrittwieser; Th Simon; M Smietanski; B Stechemesser; M Timoney; P Chowbey
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  11 in total

1.  IPOM: history of an acronym.

Authors:  F Muysoms
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Management of a primary ventral incisional hernia: a survey of the International Hernia Collaboration.

Authors:  James G Bittner; Mercedeh Baghai; Brian P Jacob
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-03-04

3.  The Treatment of Incisional Hernia.

Authors:  Ulrich A Dietz; Simone Menzel; Johan Lock; Armin Wiegering
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Comment to: "Long-term retromuscular and intraperitoneal mesh size changes within a randomized controlled trial on incisional hernia repair, including a review of the literature." Rogmark P., Ekberg O, Montgomery A.

Authors:  J Li; W Zhang
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Drain tube use in incisional hernia repair: a national survey.

Authors:  Y Luo; S Mohammed Jinnaah; D Masood; R Hodgson
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 6.  Excess Body Weight and Abdominal Hernia.

Authors:  Ulrich A Dietz; Omar Yusef Kudsi; Fahri Gokcal; Naseem Bou-Ayash; Urs Pfefferkorn; Gottfried Rudofsky; Johannes Baur; Armin Wiegering
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2021-04-28

7.  Does coagulopathy, anticoagulant or antithrombotic therapy matter in incisional hernia repair? Data from the Herniamed Registry.

Authors:  Ralph F Staerkle; Henry Hoffmann; Ferdinand Köckerling; Daniela Adolf; Reinhard Bittner; Philipp Kirchhoff
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Robotic hernia repair III. English version : Robotic incisional hernia repair with transversus abdominis release (r‑TAR). Video report and results of a cohort study.

Authors:  Ulrich A Dietz; O Yusef Kudsi; Miguel Garcia-Ureña; Johannes Baur; Michaela Ramser; Sladjana Maksimovic; Nicola Keller; Jörg Dörfer; Lukas Eisner; Armin Wiegering
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 9.  [Robotic hernia repair : Part II: Robotic primary ventral and incisional hernia repair (rv-TAPP and r-Rives or r-TARUP). Video report and results of a series of 118 patients].

Authors:  Johannes Baur; Michaela Ramser; Nicola Keller; Filip Muysoms; Jörg Dörfer; Armin Wiegering; Lukas Eisner; Ulrich A Dietz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 10.  Robotic hernia repair II. English version : Robotic primary ventral and incisional hernia repair (rv‑TAPP and r‑Rives or r‑TARUP). Video report and results of a series of 118 patients.

Authors:  Johannes Baur; Michaela Ramser; Nicola Keller; Filip Muysoms; Jörg Dörfer; Armin Wiegering; Lukas Eisner; Ulrich A Dietz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.