| Literature DB >> 27913745 |
Jun-Jing Li1, Yin-Hui Huang2, You-Yu Lin2, Mi-Mi Li3, Ya-Fang Chen3, Ruo-Wei Cai2,3.
Abstract
Objective To explore the possible correlation between uric acid levels and leukoaraiosis (LA). Methods This cross-sectional study enrolled patients who presented with some neurological discomfort (e.g. dizziness, headache, mild cognitive impairment). Potential demographic and clinical risk factors associated with LA, including sex, age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking, alcohol consumption, dyslipidaemia, plasma fibrinogen, D-dimer, uric acid, and homocysteine, were investigated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results A total of 268 patients were enrolled in the study and divided into the LA group ( n = 164) and the non-LA group ( n = 104). Compared with the non-LA group, uric acid was significantly higher in the LA group (mean ± SD: 356.49 ± 121.85 µmol/l versus 289.96 ± 102.98 µmol/l). Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that uric acid was an independent risk factor for LA (odds ratio 1.285; 95% confidence interval 1.062, 1.556). Conclusion Hyperuricaemia was an independent risk factor for leukoaraiosis in Chinese patients.Entities:
Keywords: Uric acid; leukoaraiosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27913745 PMCID: PMC5536588 DOI: 10.1177/0300060516674353
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Med Res ISSN: 0300-0605 Impact factor: 1.671
Baseline clinical and demographic characteristics of the patients with and without leukoaraiosis (LA) who participated in this study to investigate that association between uric acid levels and LA.
| Characteristic | LA group | Non-LA group | Statistical significance[ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 65.43 ± 9.56 | 52.77 ± 7.05 | |
| Sex, male/female | 98/66 | 32/72 | |
| Hypertension, yes/no | 108/56 | 16/88 | |
| Diabetes mellitus, yes/no | 36/128 | 0/104 | |
| Alcohol consumption, yes/no | 24/140 | 4/100 | |
| Smoking, yes/no | 38/126 | 12/92 | |
| CAD, yes/no | 16/148 | 8/96 | NS |
| UA, µmol/l | 356.49 ± 121.85 | 289.96 ± 102.98 | |
| FIB, g/l | 3.28 ± 0.84 | 2.86 ± 0.67 | |
| HCY, µmol/l | 15.57 ± 6.22 | 12.74 ± 4.93 | |
| ALB, g/l | 49.95 ± 5.06 | 43.52 ± 3.61 | |
| FBG, mmol/l | 5.79 ± 2.87 | 5.14 ± 0.64 | |
| LDL-C, mmol/l | 1.19 ± 0.41 | 1.34 ± 0.48 | |
| HDL-C, mmol/l | 2.95 ± 1.06 | 2.70 ± 0.96 | |
| GLB, g/l | 27.04 ± 4.22 | 26.34 ± 5.56 | NS |
| CHO, mmol/l | 4.79 ± 1.20 | 4.71 ± 0.99 | NS |
| TG, mmol/l | 1.45 ± 0.78 | 1.31 ± 0.88 | NS |
| D-Dimer, µg/l | 0.51 ± 0.67 | 0.43 ± 0.36 | NS |
| PLT, ×109/l | 225.85 ± 57.54 | 232.96 ± 64.47 | NS |
| HCT | 0.41 ± 0.11 | 0.40 ± 0.05 | NS |
| Apo-A, g/l | 1.24 ± 0.30 | 1.28 ± 0.26 | NS |
| Apo-B, g/l | 0.93 ± 0.33 | 0.90 ± 0.25 | NS |
Data presented as mean ± SD or n of patients.
χ2-test for categorical variables and Student’s t-test or one-way analysis of variance followed by the Tukey’s b test for multiple comparisons of continuous variables.
CAD, coronary artery disease; UA, uric acid; FIB, fibrinogen; HCY, homocysteine; ALB, albumin; FBG, fasting blood glucose; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; GLB, globulin; CHO, cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; PLT, platelet count; HCT, haematocrit; Apo-A, apolipoprotein-A; Apo-B, apolipoprotein-B; NS, no significant between-group difference (P ≥ 0.05).
Multivariate logistic regression analyses for independent clinical and demographic risk factors for leukoaraiosis.
| Characteristic | B | Standard error | χ2-test (Wald) | Statistical significance | OR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypertension | 0.145 | 0.069 | 4.430 | 1.156 (1.010, 1.324) | |
| Homocysteine | 0.112 | 0.055 | 4.170 | 1.118 (1.004, 1.245) | |
| Age | 1.511 | 0.465 | 10.566 | 4.533 (1.822, 11.275) | |
| Uric acid | 0.251 | 0.096 | 6.583 | 1.285 (1.062, 1.556) | |
| Albumin | 0.222 | 0.093 | 5.631 | 1.252 (1.041, 1.513) | |
| Diabetes mellitus | 1.217 | 0.411 | 8.759 | 3.378 (1.509, 7.565) |
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.