Literature DB >> 27913604

Conversion of T cells to B cells by inactivation of polycomb-mediated epigenetic suppression of the B-lineage program.

Tomokatsu Ikawa1,2,3, Kyoko Masuda2,4, Takaho A Endo5, Mitsuhiro Endo6, Kyoichi Isono6, Yoko Koseki6, Rinako Nakagawa7, Kohei Kometani8, Junichiro Takano1,6, Yasutoshi Agata9, Yoshimoto Katsura2,10, Tomohiro Kurosaki7,8, Miguel Vidal11, Haruhiko Koseki6, Hiroshi Kawamoto2,4.   

Abstract

In general, cell fate is determined primarily by transcription factors, followed by epigenetic mechanisms fixing the status. While the importance of transcription factors controlling cell fate has been well characterized, epigenetic regulation of cell fate maintenance remains to be elucidated. Here we provide an obvious fate conversion case, in which the inactivation of polycomb-medicated epigenetic regulation results in conversion of T-lineage progenitors to the B-cell fate. In T-cell-specific Ring1A/B-deficient mice, T-cell development was severely blocked at an immature stage. We found that these developmentally arrested T-cell precursors gave rise to functional B cells upon transfer to immunodeficient mice. We further demonstrated that the arrest was almost completely canceled by additional deletion of Pax5 These results indicate that the maintenance of T-cell fate critically requires epigenetic suppression of the B-lineage gene program.
© 2016 Ikawa et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  B cell; T-cell development; epigenetics; lineage commitment; reprogramming; transcription factor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27913604      PMCID: PMC5159663          DOI: 10.1101/gad.290593.116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Dev        ISSN: 0890-9369            Impact factor:   11.361


The process by which progenitors with multiple developmental potentials terminate some of them is termed lineage commitment. Lineage commitment generally proceeds in two steps: First, in the specification step, progenitors are biased to produce a certain lineage but still retain their other potentials. Second, in the determination step, progenitors become determined to produce that lineage but not others (Rothenberg et al. 2008; Mandel and Grosschedl 2010; Aloia et al. 2013). In general, during the progression to the lineage determination step, transcription factors initially determine which genes are activated or silenced, and this is followed by epigenetic mechanisms that stably maintain the activated or silenced status of the affected genes by histone modification or DNA methylation. In that sense, transcription factors primarily serve as major lineage determinants. Indeed, it is well known that cell fate can be changed by genetically modifying transcription factors. For example, deletion of PAX5 and EBF1 in early B-lineage cells leads to generation of other hematopoietic lineage cells (Nutt et al. 1999; Cobaleda et al. 2007; Nechanitzky et al. 2013), and overexpression of CEBPα leads to conversion of B- or T-lineage cells into macrophages (Xie et al. 2004; Laiosa et al. 2006). Moreover, recent studies of so-called “reprogramming” have shown that somatic cells can be converted into embryonic stem (ES)-like cells or directly into other types of somatic cells when they are provided appropriate transcription factors (Takahashi and Yamanaka 2006; Ieda et al. 2010; Szabo et al. 2010). On the other hand, in the case of epigenetic mechanisms, alteration of the epigenetic status usually does not lead to drastic cell fate conversions. Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are some of the major players in epigenetic repression of genes (Sparmann and van Lohuizen 2006; Aloia et al. 2013). In mice deficient for a polycomb component, an impairment of anterior transformation of vertebral identity as well as a defect in the development of various types of hematopoietic cells have been reported (van der Lugt et al. 1994; Iwama et al. 2004; Cales et al. 2008; Miyazaki et al. 2008; Oguro et al. 2010). However, so far, no cases of obvious cell fate conversion have been reported in mice with genetically modified polycomb components. This is also true for other epigenetic modulators, such as DNA methyltransferase (Trowbridge et al. 2009; Challen et al. 2014) or AT-rich sequence binding 1 (Satb1) (Satoh et al. 2013; Will et al. 2013). We focused on the process of lineage restriction from multipotent hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) to T-cell progenitors. T cells are produced in the thymus from progenitors derived from fetal liver or bone marrow (BM). In the thymus, during the immature CD4−CD8− (double-negative [DN]) stage, cells differentiate from the DN1 to DN4 stages, and TCRβ chain gene rearrangement takes place at the DN3 stage. DN cells then differentiate into the CD4+CD8+ (double-positive [DP]) stage and then into the mature CD4-single-positive (SP) or CD8SP stage. It was shown previously that the restriction step from HSCs toward T-cell progenitors is initiated by the production of myelo–lymphoid progenitors (Lu et al. 2002) followed by the myeloid–T progenitors (Bell and Bhandoola 2008; Wada et al. 2008). We further showed that such myeloid–T progenitors become determined to the T-cell lineage at the DN2 stage (Masuda et al. 2007) and that this T-lineage determination step is driven by the transcription factor Bcl11b (Ikawa et al. 2010; Li et al. 2010a,b). It then became of interest to ask how the T-cell-determined status is maintained. PcG proteins consist of two main complexes, termed Polycomb-repressive complex 1 (PRC1) and PRC2. PRC2 complexes initially induce histone H3K27 trimethylation (H3K27me3), and, subsequently, RING finger E3 ligases of PRC1 complexes catalyze histone H2AK119 monoubiquitylation, leading to a conformational change of histones to a repressive state (Aloia et al. 2013). Ring1B and its paralog, Ring1A, are components of PRC1 that mediate monoubiquitilation of H2AK119. They associate with many other proteins such as Bmi-1, Mel18, and Phc1 to form the core PRC1 complexes. Previous reports have shown that deletion of Mel18 or Bmi1 results in the impaired proliferation of thymocytes at the DN2 stage or DN3 stage, respectively (Miyazaki et al. 2005, 2008). However, the deletion of each gene does not completely abrogate PRC1 function, since these molecules have other compensatory partner molecules. It has been reported that the deletion of Ring1b led to severe gastrulation defects and embryonic lethality (Voncken et al. 2003), whereas the inactivation of Ring1a in mice resulted in no overt phenotypes, suggesting the functional predominance of Ring1B over Ring1A (del Mar Lorente et al. 2000). In order to completely inactivate the function of PRC1 complexes, we used a Ring1b conditional deletion in the setting of a Ring1a-deficient background. We found that the T-cell development was blocked at the immature CD4−CD8− DN stage in the thymi of Ring1A/B-double-deficient mice. This developmental block was partially rescued by the additional deletion of Cdkn2a, a cell cycle inhibitor, resulting in the generation of CD4+CD8+ DP cells. We further showed that these DP cells were able to differentiate into functional IgM+ B cells upon transfer to immunodeficient mice. On the other hand, the severe T-cell developmental block seen in Ring1a/b conditional deficient mice was almost overcome by additional deletion of Pax5, demonstrating that Pax5 is a major target of polycomb during early T-cell development. These results indicate that the maintenance of T-cell fate requires continuous epigenetic suppression of the B-lineage-specific gene program.

Results

Ring1a/b is essential for T-cell development

To examine the expression profiles of Ring1B in the hematopoietic system, we first analyzed Ring1B-YFP reporter mice in which YFP-coding sequences were knocked into the Ring1B gene locus (Isono et al. 2013). Ring1B was expressed at a higher level in DN cells than DP, CD4SP, or CD8SP cells, peaking at the DN2 stage (Supplemental Fig. S1A–D). Additionally, the expression of Ring1B in DN cells was higher than that of mature T and B cells in the spleen or myeloid and B cells in the BM (Supplemental Fig. S1E–H). To study the function of Ring1a/b during T-cell differentiation, we crossed Ring1a−/− mice and mice with transgenic expression of Cre recombinase driven by the Lck promoter and carrying loxP-flanked alleles encoding Ring1B (LckCre-Ring1a−/−Ring1bfl/fl: Lck double knockout) mice (Fig. 1A,B; Supplemental Fig. S2A). The T-cell-specific Lck-Cre gene specifically deletes the floxed Ring1b allele at the DN2–3 stage in T cells in the thymus. In Lck double-knockout mice, the number of thymocytes was reduced to ∼5% of that in the Ring1a−/−Ring1bfl/fl control mice (Fig. 1B). TCRβ+ cells were nearly absent, and T-cell development was completely blocked at the DN3 stage in Lck double-knockout mice. While the proportion of TCRγδ+ cells was increased, their absolute number did not significantly change in Lck double-knockout mice (Supplemental Fig. S2C). This could be because most of the γδ+ T-cell precursors diverge before the DN3 stage, where the LckCre activity becomes on. We also generated double-knockout mice using Cd4-Cre whose Cre expression was controlled by the Cd4 promoter and found that the frequency of T cells in the thymus and spleen was similar to that of the control mice (Supplemental Fig. S3A,B), indicating that Ring1a/b is dispensable at later stages of T-cell development.
Figure 1.

Ring1a/b is essential for T-cell development. (A) Flow cytometric analysis of cells in the thymi of LckCre(−) (control) or LckCre(+) (double knockout [DKO]) Ring1a−/−Ring1bfl/fl mice. Thymocytes were analyzed for the expression of CD4 versus CD8, c-kit versus CD25 gated on Lineage marker-negative (Lin−) cells, and TCRβ. (B) The number of thymocytes in control or double-knockout mice. (C) Flow cytometric analysis of thymic cells from LckCre(−) (control) or LckCre(+) (triple knockout [TKO]) Cdkn2a−/−Ring1a−/−Ring1bfl/fl mice. Thymocytes were analyzed for the expression of CD4 versus CD8 and c-kit versus CD25 gated on Lin− cells. (D) The number of thymocytes in control or triple-knockout mice. (E) Expression of CD19 by DN3 and DN4 cells from control and triple-knockout mice. (F) Derepressed genes in Lin− thymocytes from double-knockout and triple-knockout mice compared with control mice identified by microarray analysis. (G) Thymic DN3 cells from Ert2Cre(−) (control) or Ert2Cre(+) (triple knockout) Cdkn2a−/−Ring1a−/− Ring1bfl/fl mice were sorted and cultured on TSt-4/Delta-like 1 (DLL1) cells in the presence of 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT). The cultured cells were harvested at day 3, and quantitative RT–PCR (qRT–PCR) was performed for expression of the indicated genes. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments. Mean ± SD. (*) P < 0.05; (**) P < 0.01; (***) P < 0.001, Student's t-test in B, D, and G.

Ring1a/b is essential for T-cell development. (A) Flow cytometric analysis of cells in the thymi of LckCre(−) (control) or LckCre(+) (double knockout [DKO]) Ring1a−/−Ring1bfl/fl mice. Thymocytes were analyzed for the expression of CD4 versus CD8, c-kit versus CD25 gated on Lineage marker-negative (Lin−) cells, and TCRβ. (B) The number of thymocytes in control or double-knockout mice. (C) Flow cytometric analysis of thymic cells from LckCre(−) (control) or LckCre(+) (triple knockout [TKO]) Cdkn2a−/−Ring1a−/−Ring1bfl/fl mice. Thymocytes were analyzed for the expression of CD4 versus CD8 and c-kit versus CD25 gated on Lin− cells. (D) The number of thymocytes in control or triple-knockout mice. (E) Expression of CD19 by DN3 and DN4 cells from control and triple-knockout mice. (F) Derepressed genes in Lin− thymocytes from double-knockout and triple-knockout mice compared with control mice identified by microarray analysis. (G) Thymic DN3 cells from Ert2Cre(−) (control) or Ert2Cre(+) (triple knockout) Cdkn2a−/−Ring1a−/− Ring1bfl/fl mice were sorted and cultured on TSt-4/Delta-like 1 (DLL1) cells in the presence of 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT). The cultured cells were harvested at day 3, and quantitative RT–PCR (qRT–PCR) was performed for expression of the indicated genes. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments. Mean ± SD. (*) P < 0.05; (**) P < 0.01; (***) P < 0.001, Student's t-test in B, D, and G. Cdkn2a, a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor, is known to be an important target of polycomb-mediated repression in hematopoietic lineages. Inactivation of Cdkn2a has been shown to restore the defective self-renewal capacity of HSCs and thymocyte proliferation observed in Bmi1-defecient mice (Miyazaki et al. 2008; Oguro et al. 2010). To study the role of Cdkn2a on the Lck double-knockout phenotype, we generated Lck double-knockout mice on a Cdkn2a−/− background (Lck triple-knockout mice). We found that in the Lck triple-knockout mice, the number of thymocytes was not restored; however, some DP cells were generated (Fig. 1C,D; Supplemental Fig. S2B,D). Such minimal rescue in this setting may indicate the existence of other essential target genes whose derepression hampers T-cell development. We then noticed that CD19 is expressed by DN3 and DN4 cells in the Lck triple-knockout mice (Fig. 1E). Global gene expression profiles of Lineage marker-negative (Lin−) cells in the thymus revealed that several B-cell lineage-specific genes but not other lineage markers or stem cell-related genes were substantially up-regulated in the Lck double-knockout and Lck triple-knockout T-cell progenitors (Fig. 1F). To further characterize the DN3 and DN4 cells in the thymi of Lck double-knockout mice, expression of B-lineage-associated genes was analyzed by quantitative RT–PCR (qRT–PCR). Expression of Ebf1 and Pax5 in DN3 cells of Lck double-knockout mice was substantially up-regulated, although the level was still low compared with that of CD19+ cells in normal BM (Supplemental Fig. S4A,C). Of note, the expression of Ebf1, Pax5, Cd79a, Cd79b, and Vpreb1 was increased dramatically in DN4 cells in Lck double-knockout mice, indicating that the derepression of B-lineage-associated genes started at the DN3 stage but became prominent at the DN4 stage (Supplemental Fig. S4B,C). This is consistent with a previous report that showed the premature derepression of B-lineage genes in HSCs from Bmi1-deficient mice (Oguro et al. 2010). To confirm that derepression of B-lineage genes really occurs at the DN3 stage, we generated triple-knockout mice with an Ert2-Cre transgene encoding a hormone-inducible Cre-estrogen receptor fusion protein (Ert2Cre-Cdkn2a−/−Ring1bfl/fl [ERT2 triple-knockout] mice), in which triple-knockout status can be induced by exposure to 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT). DN3 cells from ERT2 triple-knockout mice were cultured on TSt-4/Delta-like 1 (DLL1) cells, which are stromal cells that support the proliferation and differentiation of T-lineage cells, in the presence of 4-OHT. After 72 h of induction, cells were harvested, and mRNA expression was analyzed by qRT–PCR. Down-regulation of Ring1b and up-regulation of B-lineage genes such as Ebf1 and Pax5 were seen (Fig. 1G). These data indicate that a subset of B-lineage-associated genes is directly repressed by PRC1 in T-cell progenitors. As shown in Supplemental Figure S3A, CD19 expression in CD4SP and CD8SP cells in the thymi of Cd4Cre-Ring1a−/−Ring1bfl/fl mice was barely detectable, indicating that suppression of B-cell genes by Ring1a/b persists until the DP stage, whereas Ring1a/b is dispensable at later stages of T-cell development.

Conversion of thymic DP cells from LckCre-Cdkn2a−/− Ring1a−/−Ring1bfl/fl (triple-knockout) mice into B cells in vivo

To determine the developmental plasticity of the affected T-cell progenitors, DP cells from the thymi of Lck triple-knockout and control mice were transferred to sublethally irradiated immunodeficient mice (Fig. 2A). Whereas DP cells from control mice gave rise to CD4+SP and CD8+SP mature T cells in the spleen, those from triple-knockout mice failed to generate T cells. Surprisingly, instead, the triple-knockout DP cells gave rise to CD19+IgM+ B cells in the spleens and BM of reconstituted mice (Fig. 2B,C). Similarly, upon transferring to immunodeficient mice, the CD19−DN3 cells from Lck triple-knockout mice also gave rise to CD19+IgM+ cells in the spleens and BM, whereas the DN3 cells and DP cells of Lck double-knockout mice failed to generate B-lineage cells (Supplemental Fig. S5). These data indicate that Lck triple-knockout T-cell progenitors retain the potential to differentiate into B cells even after they reach the DP stage. Of note, we were not able to detect intermediate B-cell progenitors in the BM and spleen (Fig. 2B,C; Supplemental Fig. S5). Moreover, we failed to detect the transdifferentiation in vitro (data not shown), suggesting that the T-cell progenitors of Lck triple-knockout mice directly converted to CD19+IgM+ cells.
Figure 2.

Conversion of thymic DP cells from LckCre-Cdkn2a−/−Ring1a−/−Ring1bfl/fl (triple-knockout [TKO]) mice into B cells in vivo. (A) Schematic representation for the developmental potential of DP cells from control or triple-knockout mice. (B) Flow cytometric analysis of cells in the spleens and BM of NOD/Shi-scid, IL2Rγnull (NOG) mice transplanted with DP cells from control or triple-knockout mice. Expression of CD4 versus CD8 and CD19 versus IgM is shown. (C) Flow cytometric analysis of cells in the BM of NOG mice transplanted with DP cells of triple-knockout mice at 6 wk after injection. Cells were analyzed for the expression of CD19 versus Mac1, CD19 versus B220, and TCRβ versus IgM gated on CD45.2. (D,E) qRT–PCR analysis of converted B cells purified from the BM for the expression of B-lineage-associated (D) or T-lineage-associated (E) genes. (F,G) In vitro stimulation of converted B cells for investigating proliferation and IgM secretion. Converted and wild-type splenic B cells were sorted and labeled with CFSE. The labeled cells were stimulated with LPS and IL-4 for 4 d. Flow cytometric analysis (F) and IgM secretion measured by ELISA (G) of converted (triple-knockout) and wild-type B cells after stimulation are shown. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments. Mean ± SD. (*) P < 0.05; (**) P < 0.01; (***) P < 0.001, Student's t-test in D, E, and G.

Conversion of thymic DP cells from LckCre-Cdkn2a−/−Ring1a−/−Ring1bfl/fl (triple-knockout [TKO]) mice into B cells in vivo. (A) Schematic representation for the developmental potential of DP cells from control or triple-knockout mice. (B) Flow cytometric analysis of cells in the spleens and BM of NOD/Shi-scid, IL2Rγnull (NOG) mice transplanted with DP cells from control or triple-knockout mice. Expression of CD4 versus CD8 and CD19 versus IgM is shown. (C) Flow cytometric analysis of cells in the BM of NOG mice transplanted with DP cells of triple-knockout mice at 6 wk after injection. Cells were analyzed for the expression of CD19 versus Mac1, CD19 versus B220, and TCRβ versus IgM gated on CD45.2. (D,E) qRT–PCR analysis of converted B cells purified from the BM for the expression of B-lineage-associated (D) or T-lineage-associated (E) genes. (F,G) In vitro stimulation of converted B cells for investigating proliferation and IgM secretion. Converted and wild-type splenic B cells were sorted and labeled with CFSE. The labeled cells were stimulated with LPS and IL-4 for 4 d. Flow cytometric analysis (F) and IgM secretion measured by ELISA (G) of converted (triple-knockout) and wild-type B cells after stimulation are shown. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments. Mean ± SD. (*) P < 0.05; (**) P < 0.01; (***) P < 0.001, Student's t-test in D, E, and G. The CD19+IgM+ cells derived from Lck triple-knockout DP cells were found to have a complete B-cell lineage identity because they express a set of B-cell lineage-associated genes at levels comparable with wild-type B cells, while T-cell lineage-associated genes such as Tcf7, Gata3, or Cd3e were almost undetectable (Fig. 2D,E). To determine the function of the converted B cells, the CD19+IgM+ cells derived from Lck triple-knockout DP cells were labeled with CFSE and cultured with LPS and IL-4 for 4 d. The B cells converted from LCK triple-knockout DP cells had a normal proliferative response and IgM secretion upon LPS and IL-4 stimulation, indicating that the converted B cells were functional (Fig. 2F,G).

Rearrangements of immunoglobulin heavy chain (Igh) and Tcrβ chain genes in B cells derived from DP cells in the thymi of Lck triple-knockout mice

Consistent with the surface expression of IgM, PCR analysis revealed DH–JH and VH–DJH rearrangements on the Igh gene locus as well as Vκ–Jκ and Vλ–Jλ rearrangements of the immunoglobulin light chain (Igl) locus in CD19+IgM+ cells in the spleens of mice reconstituted with Lck triple-knockout DP cells, although they seemed to be oligoclonal. The converted B cells derived from Lck triple-knockout DP cells also carried V–DJ rearranged Tcrβ chain genes, confirming the T-cell origin of the cells (Fig. 3A).
Figure 3.

Rearrangements of Igh and Tcrβ chain genes in B cells derived from DP cells in the thymi of Lck triple-knockout mice. (A) Analysis of Igh V(D)J, Igl Vκ–Jκ and Vλ–Jλ, and Tcrβ V(D)J gene rearrangement in converted B cells derived from thymic DP cells of triple-knockout mice. BM CD19+ cells and DP thymocytes from normal B6 mice were used as controls. (B) Seminested single-cell PCR analysis to detect T-cell- and B-cell-specific rearrangements of Igh and Tcrβ loci in the individual converted B cells in the spleen. Asterisks indicate rearrangements detected. Data are shown from three independent experiments.

Rearrangements of Igh and Tcrβ chain genes in B cells derived from DP cells in the thymi of Lck triple-knockout mice. (A) Analysis of Igh V(D)J, Igl Vκ–Jκ and Vλ–Jλ, and Tcrβ V(D)J gene rearrangement in converted B cells derived from thymic DP cells of triple-knockout mice. BM CD19+ cells and DP thymocytes from normal B6 mice were used as controls. (B) Seminested single-cell PCR analysis to detect T-cell- and B-cell-specific rearrangements of Igh and Tcrβ loci in the individual converted B cells in the spleen. Asterisks indicate rearrangements detected. Data are shown from three independent experiments. To further confirm the conversion of T-lineage cells to B cells, we examined the T-cell- and B-cell-specific V–DJ rearrangements at the single-cell level by using the seminested PCR technique in individual B cells from the spleens of mice reconstituted with Lck triple-knockout DP cells (Nechanitzky et al. 2013). We detected both Vβ and VH rearrangements in 14%–40% of the individual converted B cells (Fig. 3B; Table 1). These data demonstrate that the conversion event stably takes place at a certain frequency. Whereas one could argue that such oligoclonality is reminiscent of preleukemic clones, this is unlikely because the converted cells never developed into leukemia in recipient mice even several months after transplantation. Furthermore, the low rearrangement frequency of both Vβ and VH loci was also shown previously in the case of the conversion of B cells to T-lineage cells of Pax5 knockout and Ebf1 knockout mice (Cobaleda et al. 2007; Nechanitzky et al. 2013).
Table 1.

Quantification of V(D)J rearrangement of Igh and Tcrb loci in individual B cells converted from DP cells in the thymi of Cdkn2a Ring1a/b triple-knockout mice

Quantification of V(D)J rearrangement of Igh and Tcrb loci in individual B cells converted from DP cells in the thymi of Cdkn2a Ring1a/b triple-knockout mice

Association of Ring1B with the promoter regions of B-lineage-associated genes in thymocytes

Previous studies have suggested that the PcG proteins regulate differentiation and maintenance of HSCs by controlling the expression of various target genes (Oguro et al. 2010; Aloia et al. 2013; Xie et al. 2014). Of note, the PRC1 component Bmi-1 is implicated in the repression of transcription factors essential for the generation of B-lineage cells, such as Ebf1 and Pax5 (Oguro et al. 2010). To examine Ring1B occupancy of B-lineage gene loci in normal T-lineage cells, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-on-chip analysis of thymocytes was performed. The results revealed the binding of Ring1B to B-lineage-associated genes such as Pax5, Ebf1, Irf4, and Irf8 as well as H3K27me3, a hallmark of polycomb-repressive activity, in the same regions (Fig. 4A). The binding of Ring1B and H3K27me3 mark was not observed in the promoter regions of Gata3 or Bcl11b. We confirmed that binding of Ring1B and H3K27me3 marks was at the promoter regions of Pax5 and Ebf1 but not Bcl11b loci by ChIP analysis in normal T cells (Fig. 4B). To further confirm the Ring1B occupancy at the promoter regions of B-lineage loci in T cells, we performed ChIP-PCR analysis in DN3 and DP cells sorted from normal thymocytes. The substantial binding of Ring1B at the promoter regions of Pax5 and Ebf1 loci was observed in DN3 cells, whereas the binding of Ring1B was dramatically reduced in DP cells (Fig. 4C). These results indicate that Ring1A/B binds directly to B-lineage-associated gene loci to repress ectopic expression of these genes during T-cell development.
Figure 4.

Association of Ring1B with the promoter regions of B-lineage-associated genes in thymocytes. (A) ChIP-on-chip analysis of total thymocytes from wild-type mice showing the H3K4me3, H3K27me3, and RING1B binding to the promoter regions (from −6 kb to +6 kb relative to the transcriptional start sites [TSS]) of the indicated B-lineage- or T-lineage-associated genes. (B) ChIP analysis showing binding of H3K4me3, H3K27me3, and Ring1B at the promoter regions of Pax5, Ebf1, and Bcl11b and the PcG target Hoxa9 gene in T-lineage cells in the thymi of wild-type (WT) and Lck triple-knockout (TKO) mice. (C) ChIP analysis showing binding of Ring1B at the promoter regions of Pax5, Ebf1, and Bcl11b in DN3 and DP cells in the thymi of wild-type mice. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments in B and C. Mean ± SD. (*) P < 0.05; (**) P < 0.01; (***) P < 0.001, Student's t-test.

Association of Ring1B with the promoter regions of B-lineage-associated genes in thymocytes. (A) ChIP-on-chip analysis of total thymocytes from wild-type mice showing the H3K4me3, H3K27me3, and RING1B binding to the promoter regions (from −6 kb to +6 kb relative to the transcriptional start sites [TSS]) of the indicated B-lineage- or T-lineage-associated genes. (B) ChIP analysis showing binding of H3K4me3, H3K27me3, and Ring1B at the promoter regions of Pax5, Ebf1, and Bcl11b and the PcG target Hoxa9 gene in T-lineage cells in the thymi of wild-type (WT) and Lck triple-knockout (TKO) mice. (C) ChIP analysis showing binding of Ring1B at the promoter regions of Pax5, Ebf1, and Bcl11b in DN3 and DP cells in the thymi of wild-type mice. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments in B and C. Mean ± SD. (*) P < 0.05; (**) P < 0.01; (***) P < 0.001, Student's t-test.

Deletion of PAX5 restores T-cell development in Ring1A/B-deficient mice

To determine whether the main role of Ring1A/B is to repress Pax5 and the related B-lineage-associated gene programs, we investigated whether deletion of Pax5 would restore the development of T cells in the thymi of Ring1A/B-deficient mice. We bred LckCre-Ring1a−/− Ring1bfl/fl mice with Pax5fl/fl mice to generate T-cell-specific Ring1a/b Pax5 triple-knockout mice. Notably, CD4+CD8+DP, CD4SP, and CD8SP cells were normally generated in the thymi of PAX5 triple-knockout mice. The proportions of TCRβ+ and TCRγδ+ cells were restored by the deletion of Pax5. The total number of thymocytes in PAX5 triple-knockout mice was also recovered to control levels (Fig. 5A,B; Supplemental Fig. S6). Similarly, The CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells were also normally generated in the spleens of PAX5 triple-knockout mice (Fig. 5C). These data indicated that deletion of Pax5 restored the differentiation potential of Ring1a/b-deficient T-cell progenitors. Thus, PAX5 is one of the critical targets of PcG proteins during early T-cell development.
Figure 5.

Deletion of Pax5 restores T-cell development in the thymi and spleens of Ring1A/B double-knockout mice. (A) Flow cytometric analysis of cells from the thymi of LckCre(−) (control) or LckCre(+) (triple-knockout [TKO]) Ring1A−/− Ring1Bfl/flPax5fl/fl mice. Thymocytes gated on Lin− cells were analyzed for the expression of CD4 versus CD8, TCRβ versus TCRγδ, and c-kit versus CD25. (B) The number of thymocytes in control or triple-knockout mice. (C) Flow cytometric analysis of cells from the spleens of LckCre(−) (control) or LckCre(+) (triple-knockout) Ring1A−/−Ring1Bfl/flPax5fl/fl mice. Splenocytes were analyzed for the expression of CD4 versus CD8 and TCRβ versus TCRγδ. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments in A–C. Mean ± SD in B.

Deletion of Pax5 restores T-cell development in the thymi and spleens of Ring1A/B double-knockout mice. (A) Flow cytometric analysis of cells from the thymi of LckCre(−) (control) or LckCre(+) (triple-knockout [TKO]) Ring1A−/− Ring1Bfl/flPax5fl/fl mice. Thymocytes gated on Lin− cells were analyzed for the expression of CD4 versus CD8, TCRβ versus TCRγδ, and c-kit versus CD25. (B) The number of thymocytes in control or triple-knockout mice. (C) Flow cytometric analysis of cells from the spleens of LckCre(−) (control) or LckCre(+) (triple-knockout) Ring1A−/−Ring1Bfl/flPax5fl/fl mice. Splenocytes were analyzed for the expression of CD4 versus CD8 and TCRβ versus TCRγδ. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments in A–C. Mean ± SD in B.

Discussion

In this study, we dissected the role of PcG proteins in the maintenance of T-cell fate by using the T-cell-specific Ring1a/b-deficient mice. We demonstrated that the Pax5 locus is one of the main targets of PcG proteins to suppress the B-cell potential during early T-cell development. The maintenance of T-cell fate by PcG proteins continued throughout the thymocyte development. However, the deletion of Ring1a/b driven by the Cre transgene under the control of the Cd4 promoter did not show any apparent defects of T cells in the spleen, indicating the critical role of PcG proteins in preventing the T-cell progenitors from choosing B-cell fate in the thymus. The scenario of T- and B-cell lineage determination and maintenance is proposed as follows (Fig. 6). At the level of uncommitted progenitors, PcG proteins repress expression of critical B-cell lineage transcription factors such as PAX5. During the B-cell lineage determination process, Pax5 is up-regulated by being released from PcG-mediated repression. On the other hand, even after the T-lineage determination step, which is initiated at the DN1 stage by Notch signaling and completed during the DN2 stage by Bcl11b up-regulation (Ikawa et al. 2010; Li et al. 2010a,b), PcG-mediated repression of Pax5 is indispensable for maintaining the T-cell lineage. When this repression is abolished, Pax5 is up-regulated in T-cell progenitors, and such cells can eventually be converted into B cells. Since constitutive activation of Pax5 under control of the Ikaros locus was not able to induce conversion of T cells to B cells (Souabni et al. 2002), sustained epigenetic suppression of B-lineage-associated genes other than Pax5, such as Ebf1 and Blnk, is also required for the normal T-lineage program. The transcription factor Bcl11b is shown to be essential for T-cell versus NK cell fate determination (Ikawa et al. 2010; Li et al. 2010a,b). Of note, the expression of Bcl11b did not change in Ring1a/b knockout T-cell progenitors (Fig. 1F), suggesting that the PcG proteins do not directly regulate the expression of Bcl11b in the maintenance of T-cell fate. This may explain why Ring1a/b-deficient T-cell progenitors did not take the NK cell fate. During this transition phase, the myeloid lineage program is not activated, probably because both Notch signal and PAX5 activity suppress the myeloid program (Nutt et al. 1999; Busslinger 2004; Rothenberg et al. 2008).
Figure 6.

Model of T or B lymphoid lineage commitment regulated by PcG proteins. The predicted function of PcG proteins during T- and B-cell development from T/B/M multipotent progenitors is shown. The orange and blue boxes reflect the activity of each genetic program. For example, orange represents the activated gene program, whereas blue represents the repressed gene program in each progenitor state. Yellow represents the activated cell status in T-cell progenitors, B-cell progenitors, and a transition phase.

Model of T or B lymphoid lineage commitment regulated by PcG proteins. The predicted function of PcG proteins during T- and B-cell development from T/B/M multipotent progenitors is shown. The orange and blue boxes reflect the activity of each genetic program. For example, orange represents the activated gene program, whereas blue represents the repressed gene program in each progenitor state. Yellow represents the activated cell status in T-cell progenitors, B-cell progenitors, and a transition phase. Previous studies indicated that Ring1B is critical for the maintenance and differentiation of HSCs. Conditional inactivation of Ring1b in hematopoietic cells promotes myeloid lineage development at the expense of B-cell differentiation (Cales et al. 2008). The additional deletion of the p16Ink4a locus rescued the defective proliferation of B-cell progenitors in the BM of Ring1b-deficient mice, suggesting an important role of Ring1b in repressing the expression of p16Ink4a for the control of proliferation and differentiation of the hematopoietic progenitors. In the present study, we observed severe reduction of T cells in the thymi of LckCre-Ring1a/b double-knockout mice. However, the T-cell differentiation was not recovered by the additional inactivation of Cdkn2a, which encodes p16Ink4a and p19arf. Moreover, the T-cell progenitors of Ring1a/b Cdkn2a triple-knockout mice reprogrammed to B-lineage cells in vivo. This might reflect the functional redundancy between Ring1A and Ring1B, although it is reported that the inactivation of Ring1a, a paralog of Ring1b in mice, results in no overt phenotypes (del Mar Lorente et al. 2000). This could also be due to the functional differences of Ring1B among the cell types and the differentiation stages of the cells. Indeed, the Ring1b-deficent myeloid cells exhibit higher proliferative potential than normal myeloid cells (Cales et al. 2008). Of note, proteomic analysis has recently identified the functionally distinct PRC1 complexes (Gao et al. 2012). All PRC1 complexes contain Ring1A/B but can be classified into six groups based on which PcG RING fingers (PCGFs) are involved. Biochemical and genomic analysis revealed the functional difference among the PRC1 complexes. PCGFs may play a key role in controlling the cell fate decision in differentiating cells. Further analysis will be needed to determine the exact role of Ring1a and Ring1b among PRC1 complexes in regulating the determination of cell fates. Our present results provide the first example that the inactivation of a single epigenetic machinery results in a drastic cell fate conversion, providing new insight into the mechanisms of lineage determination. We propose that the determined status is very asymmetric between T lineage and B lineage with regard to its dependency on transcriptional networks versus epigenetic regulation. The B-cell lineage is primarily maintained by B-lineage transcription factors, while maintenance of the T lineage requires epigenetic suppression of B-lineage transcription factors. Based on such findings, it appears that the B-cell lineage and not the T-cell lineage is the default pathway in lymphocyte development. Thus, one can conceive that the T-cell lineage was established during evolution by suppressing a pre-existing B-cell program. Alternatively, it can also be speculated that the B-cell lineage was introduced rather later during evolution by recruiting very strong transcription factors and that the T-cell lineage had to suppress them to protect its own developmental program. Although so far it is difficult to tell which is the case, the present findings may provide some clue as to how cell lineages were established during evolution.

Materials and methods

Mice

C57BL/6 (B6) mice were purchased from CLEA Japan, Inc. LckCre-Cdkn2a−/−Ring1a−/−Ring1bfl/fl, LckCre-Cdkn2a−/− Ring1a−/−Ring1bfl/flPax5fl/fl, Ert2Cre-Cdkn2a−/−Ring1a−/− Ring1bfl/fl, Cd4Cre-Cdkn2a−/−Ring1a−/−Ring1bfl/fl, and Ring1B- YFP mice were generated and maintained in our animal facility. Mice were backcrossed to B6 mice at least six times. NOD/Shi-scid, IL2Rγnull (NOG) mice were purchased from the Central Institute for Experimental Animals. Six-week-old to 8-wk-old female mice were used for the transfer experiments.

Antibodies

The following antibodies were purchased from BD Biosciences: fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated erythroid lineage cells (TER119; 561032), MAC1 (553310), GR1 (553127), CD11C (557400), B220 (553088), THY1.2 (553004), CD8A (553031), CD4 (553651), NK1.1 (553164), CD3ε (553062), CD19 (553785), TCRγδ (553177), phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated SCA-1 (553336), CD4 (553653), CD19 (553786), GR-1 (553128), NK1.1 (553165), TCRβ (553172), allophycocyanin (APC)-conjugated LY5.1 (558701), LY5.2 (558702), C-KIT (553556), and CD19 (550992). FITC-IGM (11-5790-81) was purchased from eBioscience.

Growth factors

Recombinant murine (rm) SCF, IL-7, and Flt3-ligand (L) were purchased from R&D.

Isolation of thymic Lin− cells

Single-cell suspensions of thymocytes were prepared from LckCre-Cdkn2a−/−Ring1a−/−Ring1bfl/fl and control mice. Cells were then incubated with mAbs specific for Lin markers (TER119, Mac-1, Gr-1, B220, CD3, CD4, and CD8) for 20 min on ice. Lin+ cells were depleted with Dynabeads sheep anti-rat IgG (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The Lin− cells were used for subsequent experiments.

In vitro deletion of Ring1b in sorted DN3 cells

Single-cell suspensions of the thymi from Ert2Cre-Cdkn2a−/− Ring1a−/−Ring1bfl/fl mice were prepared. Lin− cells were purified using Dynabeads sheep anti-rat IgG as described above. DN3 cells were sorted as Lin−ckit−CD25+ cells after staining with FITC-Lin, PE-CD25, and APC-ckit antibodies. The purified DN3 cells were subsequently incubated on TSt-4/DLL1 cells for 72 h in RPMI 1640 medium (GIBCO-BRL) supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 2 mg/mL sodium bicarbonate, 0.1 mM nonessential amino acid solution (GIBCO-BRL), 5 × 10−5 M 2-ME, 100 mg/mL streptomycin, 100 U/mL penicillin, 1 µM 4-OHT, 10 ng/mL SCF, 10 ng/mL IL-7, and 10 ng/mL Flt3-L. The cultured cells were stained with anti-CD45 antibody, and CD45+ cells were sorted. RNA was extracted from the sorted cells, and the RNA levels were measured by qRT–PCR.

In vitro B-cell culture

CD19+ B cells were sorted from the splenocytes of wild-type and NOG mice transplanted with DP cells from LckCre-Cdkn2a−/− Ring1a−/−Ring1bfl/fl mice. Collected cells were labeled with 5 µM CFSE (Nacalai Tesque) for 20 min at 37°C. Labeled cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 2 mg/mL sodium bicarbonate, 0.1 mM nonessential amino acid solution (GIBCO-BRL), 5 × 10−5 M 2-ME, 100 mg/mL streptomycin, and 100 U/mL penicillin. LPS (Sigma-Aldrich) and IL-4 (R&D Systems) were also added as indicated. After 96 h of culture, cell division was measured by FACS, and IgM secretion was measured by ELISA as described previously (Kometani et al. 2011).

ELISA

Ninety-six-well flat-bottomed plates were coated with 2 µg/mL anti-mouse IgM for 1 h at room temperature followed by blocking with 0.5% BSA in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. Serially diluted samples were incubated for 1 h at room temperature. After washing with PBS/0.5% Tween-20, horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgM antibodies (SouthernBiotech) were used as the substrate, and absorbance at 450 nm was measured using a microplate reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories).

Adoptive transfer of DN3 or DP cells

DN3 or DP cells (1 × 106 cells) from LckCre-Cdkn2a−/−Ring1a−/− Ring1bfl/fl mice were intravenously injected into the tail veins of sublethally irradiated (240 rad) NOG mice. Mice were analyzed 4–6 wk after reconstitution for donor chimerism in the BM and spleen.

PCR analysis of Igh and Tcrβ gene rearrangement

The analysis of Igh and Tcrβ gene rearrangement was performed as described previously (Ikawa et al. 2004). In brief, genomic DNA was prepared from B cells derived from the spleens and BM in mice transplanted with thymic DN3 or DP cells from LckCre-Cdkn2a−/−Ring1a−/−Ring1bfl/fl and control mice using the DNeasy tissue kit (Qiagen). The reaction volume was 20 µL, containing 2 µL of genomic DNA (approximately equivalent to 104 cells), 2 µL of 10× PCR buffer, 0.16 µL of 25 mM dNTP, 4 pmol of each primer, and 0.6 U of Taq polymerase (GE healthcare). The PCR reactions were performed as follows: 5 min at 94°C followed by 35 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 60°C, 2 min at 72°C, and finally 10 min at 72°C. Amplified DNA products were analyzed on an agarose gel followed by ethidium bromide staining.

Single-cell-based PCR analysis of Igh and Tcrβ gene rearrangement

The analysis was performed as described previously (Nechanitzky et al. 2013). Briefly, single converted B cells in the spleens of NOG mice derived from DP cells in the thymi of Lck triple-knockout mice were directly sorted into one well of a 96-well plate containing 20 µL of PCR buffer (Takara) supplemented with 250 µg/mL proteinase K. Single cells were digested by incubation for 60 min at 56°C followed by inactivation of proteinase K for 15 min at 95°C. The first round of PCR was done by the addition of 30 µL of PCR mix containing dNTPs, PCR buffer, and rTaq (all from Takara) as well as primers for detecting V(D)J recombination of IgH and TCRβ gene loci (Supplemental Table S3). An aliquot of 1 µL of the product of the first round of PCR and the nested primers (JH4 and Jβ2.7) in combination with one of the VH or Vβ primers was used for the second round of PCR. Amplified DNA products were analyzed on an agarose gel followed by ethidium bromide staining.

RNA extraction and qRT–PCR

Total RNA was isolated using an RNeasy kit (Qiagen). cDNA synthesis was performed using a SuperScript VILO cDNA synthesis kit (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer's protocol. Real-time PCR was performed using SYBR Premix EX Taq (Takara) and analyzed by StepOnePlus (Applied Biosystems). The reactions were performed in duplicate for 10 sec at 95°C followed by 40 cycles of 5 sec at 95°C and 30 sec at 55°C. The primer sequences used are in Supplemental Table S1.

Microarray analysis

RNA extraction was performed as described above. The expression profiles were analyzed using a Quant-iT RiboGreen RNA assay kit (Invitrogen). The quality of the RNA was analyzed using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent). The fluorescence intensities were detected using the Scan-Array Lite scanner (Perkin-Elmer). The PMT levels were adjusted to achieve 0.1%–0.5% pixel saturation. Each TIFF image was analyzed using Gene Pix Pro version 6.0 software (Molecular Devoices). The data were filtered to remove low-confidence measurements and globally normalized per array such that the median of the signal intensity was adjusted to 50 after normalization (accession no. GSE53650).

ChIP analysis

ChIP assays were performed as described (Ikawa et al. 2006; Endoh et al. 2008). Immunoprecipitated and input DNA were quantified by real-time PCR with the primers in Supplemental Table S2.

ChIP-on-chip analysis

ChIP-on-chip analysis was carried out using the mouse promoter ChIP-on-chip microarray set (Agilent Technologies, G4490A) as described previously (Endoh et al. 2008). Thymocytes of normal B6 mice were subjected to ChIP assay using anti-H3K4me3, anti-H3K27me3, and anti-Ring1B antibodies. Purified immunoprecipitated and input DNA were subjected to blunt ligation with linker oligo DNA, linker-mediated PCR (LM-PCR), labeling, hybridization, and washing following the Agilent mammalian ChIP-on-chip protocol. Scanned images were quantified with Agilent Feature Extraction software under standard conditions. Assignment of regions bound by H3K4me3, H3K27me3, and Ring1B around transcription start sites was carried out using direct sequence alignment on the mouse genome database (NCBI version 36). The location of bound regions of each protein was compared with a set of transcripts derived from the Mouse Genome Informatics database. We assigned bound regions that were within −6 kb to +6 kb of the transcription start site. Alignments on the mouse genome and transcription start sites of genes were retrieved from Ensembl (http://www.ensembl.org). The measured intensity ratios (immunoprecipitate/input: fold enrichment) were calculated, and the maximum value of the ratios in each promoter region (−6 kb to +6 kb around the transcriptional start site) of a gene was used to represent the fold enrichment of the gene. Fold enrichment was calculated only for probes whose signals from both immunoprecipitated and input DNAs were significant (P < 10−3) (accession no. GSE53650).
  40 in total

Review 1.  Polycomb silencers control cell fate, development and cancer.

Authors:  Anke Sparmann; Maarten van Lohuizen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  The common myelolymphoid progenitor: a key intermediate stage in hemopoiesis generating T and B cells.

Authors:  Min Lu; Hiroshi Kawamoto; Yoshihiro Katsube; Tomokatsu Ikawa; Yoshimoto Katsura
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 3.  Launching the T-cell-lineage developmental programme.

Authors:  Ellen V Rothenberg; Jonathan E Moore; Mary A Yui
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 53.106

4.  Poised lineage specification in multipotential hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells by the polycomb protein Bmi1.

Authors:  Hideyuki Oguro; Jin Yuan; Hitoshi Ichikawa; Tomokatsu Ikawa; Satoshi Yamazaki; Hiroshi Kawamoto; Hiromitsu Nakauchi; Atsushi Iwama
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 24.633

5.  Pax5 promotes B lymphopoiesis and blocks T cell development by repressing Notch1.

Authors:  Abdallah Souabni; Cesar Cobaleda; Michael Schebesta; Meinrad Busslinger
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 31.745

6.  Rnf2 (Ring1b) deficiency causes gastrulation arrest and cell cycle inhibition.

Authors:  Jan Willem Voncken; Bernard A J Roelen; Mieke Roefs; Stijn de Vries; Els Verhoeven; Silvia Marino; Jacqueline Deschamps; Maarten van Lohuizen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-02-14       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Thymocyte proliferation induced by pre-T cell receptor signaling is maintained through polycomb gene product Bmi-1-mediated Cdkn2a repression.

Authors:  Masaki Miyazaki; Kazuko Miyazaki; Manami Itoi; Yuko Katoh; Yun Guo; Rieko Kanno; Yuko Katoh-Fukui; Hiroaki Honda; Takashi Amagai; Maarten van Lohuizen; Hiroshi Kawamoto; Masamoto Kanno
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 31.745

8.  Conversion of mature B cells into T cells by dedifferentiation to uncommitted progenitors.

Authors:  César Cobaleda; Wolfram Jochum; Meinrad Busslinger
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Loss- and gain-of-function mutations show a polycomb group function for Ring1A in mice.

Authors:  M del Mar Lorente; C Marcos-Gutiérrez; C Pérez; J Schoorlemmer; A Ramírez; T Magin; M Vidal
Journal:  Development       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  DNA methyltransferase 1 is essential for and uniquely regulates hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells.

Authors:  Jennifer J Trowbridge; Jonathan W Snow; Jonghwan Kim; Stuart H Orkin
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 24.633

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Polycomb/Trithorax Antagonism: Cellular Memory in Stem Cell Fate and Function.

Authors:  Marjorie Brand; Kiran Nakka; Jiayu Zhu; F Jeffrey Dilworth
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 24.633

2.  De novo mutation in RING1 with epigenetic effects on neurodevelopment.

Authors:  Sarah B Pierce; Mikaela D Stewart; Suleyman Gulsuner; Tom Walsh; Abhinav Dhall; Jon M McClellan; Rachel E Klevit; Mary-Claire King
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Detailed analysis of adenosine A2a receptor (ADORA2A) and CD73 (5'-nucleotidase, ecto, NT5E) methylation and gene expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Timo J Vogt; Heidrun Gevensleben; Jörn Dietrich; Glen Kristiansen; Friedrich Bootz; Jennifer Landsberg; Diane Goltz; Dimo Dietrich
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 8.110

4.  TCR+/BCR+ dual-expressing cells and their associated public BCR clonotype are not enriched in type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Alberto Sada Japp; Wenzhao Meng; Aaron M Rosenfeld; Daniel J Perry; Puchong Thirawatananond; Rhonda L Bacher; Chengyang Liu; Jay S Gardner; Mark A Atkinson; Klaus H Kaestner; Todd M Brusko; Ali Naji; Eline T Luning Prak; Michael R Betts
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  The Route of Early T Cell Development: Crosstalk between Epigenetic and Transcription Factors.

Authors:  Veronica Della Chiara; Lucia Daxinger; Frank J T Staal
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 6.  Understanding and Modulating Immunity With Cell Reprogramming.

Authors:  Cristiana F Pires; Fábio F Rosa; Ilia Kurochkin; Carlos-Filipe Pereira
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 7.561

7.  Polycomb complexes redundantly maintain epidermal stem cell identity during development.

Authors:  Idan Cohen; Carmit Bar; Hequn Liu; Victor J Valdes; Dejian Zhao; Phillip M Galbo; Jose M Silva; Haruhiko Koseki; Deyou Zheng; Elena Ezhkova
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 8.  Structural heterogeneity of the mammalian polycomb repressor complex in immune regulation.

Authors:  Seok-Jin Kang; Taehoon Chun
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 8.718

9.  CD32+CD4+ T Cells Sharing B Cell Properties Increase With Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Replication in Lymphoid Tissues.

Authors:  Nicolas Huot; Philippe Rascle; Cyril Planchais; Vanessa Contreras; Caroline Passaes; Roger Le Grand; Anne-Sophie Beignon; Etienne Kornobis; Rachel Legendre; Hugo Varet; Asier Saez-Cirion; Hugo Mouquet; Beatrice Jacquelin; Michaela Müller-Trutwin
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 10.  Polycomb complexes in normal and malignant hematopoiesis.

Authors:  Valerio Di Carlo; Ivano Mocavini; Luciano Di Croce
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 10.539

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.