Literature DB >> 27913414

Distinct Anaerobic Bacterial Consumers of Cellobiose-Derived Carbon in Boreal Fens with Different CO2/CH4 Production Ratios.

Heli Juottonen1,2,3, Alexander Eiler2, Christina Biasi4, Eeva-Stiina Tuittila5, Kim Yrjälä6, Hannu Fritze3.   

Abstract

Northern peatlands in general have high methane (CH4) emissions, but individual peatlands show considerable variation as CH4 sources. Particularly in nutrient-poor peatlands, CH4 production can be low and exceeded by carbon dioxide (CO2) production from unresolved anaerobic processes. To clarify the role anaerobic bacterial degraders play in this variation, we compared consumers of cellobiose-derived carbon in two fens differing in nutrient status and the ratio of CO2 to CH4 produced. After [13C]cellobiose amendment, the mesotrophic fen produced equal amounts of CH4 and CO2 The oligotrophic fen had lower CH4 production but produced 3 to 59 times more CO2 than CH4 RNA stable-isotope probing revealed that in the mesotrophic fen with higher CH4 production, cellobiose-derived carbon was mainly assimilated by various recognized fermenters of Firmicutes and by Proteobacteria The oligotrophic peat with excess CO2 production revealed a wider variety of cellobiose-C consumers, including Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, but also more unconventional degraders, such as Telmatobacter-related Acidobacteria and subphylum 3 of Verrucomicrobia Prominent and potentially fermentative Planctomycetes and Chloroflexi did not appear to process cellobiose-C. Our results show that anaerobic degradation resulting in different levels of CH4 production can involve distinct sets of bacterial degraders. By distinguishing cellobiose degraders from the total community, this study contributes to defining anaerobic bacteria that process cellulose-derived carbon in peat. Several of the identified degraders, particularly fermenters and potential Fe(III) or humic substance reducers in the oligotrophic peat, represent promising candidates for resolving the origin of excess CO2 production in peatlands. IMPORTANCE: Peatlands are major sources of the greenhouse gas methane (CH4), yet in many peatlands, CO2 production from unresolved anaerobic processes exceeds CH4 production. Anaerobic degradation produces the precursors of CH4 production but also represents competing processes. We show that anaerobic degradation leading to high or low CH4 production involved distinct sets of bacteria. Well-known fermenters dominated in a peatland with high CH4 production, while novel and unconventional degraders could be identified in a site where CO2 production greatly exceeds CH4 production. Our results help identify and assign functions to uncharacterized bacteria that promote or inhibit CH4 production and reveal bacteria potentially producing the excess CO2 in acidic peat. This study contributes to understanding the microbiological basis for different levels of CH4 emission from peatlands.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anaerobic degradation; greenhouse gas; methane; microbial communities; peat; stable-isotope probing; wetland

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27913414      PMCID: PMC5288814          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02533-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  74 in total

1.  Rhizomicrobium palustre gen. nov., sp. nov., a facultatively anaerobic, fermentative stalked bacterium in the class Alphaproteobacteria isolated from rice plant roots.

Authors:  Atsuko Ueki; Yumiko Kodama; Nobuo Kaku; Takuya Shiromura; Atsuya Satoh; Kazuya Watanabe; Katsuji Ueki
Journal:  J Gen Appl Microbiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.452

Review 2.  Trophic interactions in the methanogenic microbial community of low-temperature terrestrial ecosystems.

Authors:  O R Kotsyurbenko
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2005-01-04       Impact factor: 4.194

3.  Phylogenetic analysis and in situ identification of bacteria community composition in an acidic Sphagnum peat bog.

Authors:  Svetlana N Dedysh; Timofei A Pankratov; Svetlana E Belova; Irina S Kulichevskaya; Werner Liesack
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Paludibacterium yongneupense gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from a wetland, Yongneup, in Korea.

Authors:  Soon-Wo Kwon; Byung-Yong Kim; Wan-Gyu Kim; Kwan-Hee Yoo; Seung-Hee Yoo; Jung-A Son; Hang-Yeon Weon
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.747

5.  Metabolic interdependencies between phylogenetically novel fermenters and respiratory organisms in an unconfined aquifer.

Authors:  Kelly C Wrighton; Cindy J Castelle; Michael J Wilkins; Laura A Hug; Itai Sharon; Brian C Thomas; Kim M Handley; Sean W Mullin; Carrie D Nicora; Andrea Singh; Mary S Lipton; Philip E Long; Kenneth H Williams; Jillian F Banfield
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 10.302

6.  Opitutus terrae gen. nov., sp. nov., to accommodate novel strains of the division 'Verrucomicrobia' isolated from rice paddy soil.

Authors:  K J Chin; W Liesack; P H Janssen
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.747

7.  Metabolic responses of novel cellulolytic and saccharolytic agricultural soil Bacteria to oxygen.

Authors:  Stefanie Schellenberger; Steffen Kolb; Harold L Drake
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-27       Impact factor: 5.491

8.  Uliginosibacterium gangwonense gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from a wetland, Yongneup, in Korea.

Authors:  Hang-Yeon Weon; Byung-Yong Kim; Seung-Hee Yoo; Soon-Wo Kwon; Seung-Joo Go; Erko Stackebrandt
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.747

Review 9.  Methane emissions from wetlands: biogeochemical, microbial, and modeling perspectives from local to global scales.

Authors:  Scott D Bridgham; Hinsby Cadillo-Quiroz; Jason K Keller; Qianlai Zhuang
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 10.863

10.  Controls on bacterial and archaeal community structure and greenhouse gas production in natural, mined, and restored Canadian peatlands.

Authors:  Nathan Basiliko; Kevin Henry; Varun Gupta; Tim R Moore; Brian T Driscoll; Peter F Dunfield
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 5.640

View more
  10 in total

1.  The Rhizosphere Responds: Rich Fen Peat and Root Microbial Ecology after Long-Term Water Table Manipulation.

Authors:  Danielle L Rupp; Louis J Lamit; Stephen M Techtmann; Evan S Kane; Erik A Lilleskov; Merritt R Turetsky
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Degradation Reduces Microbial Richness and Alters Microbial Functions in an Australian Peatland.

Authors:  Christina Birnbaum; Jennifer Wood; Erik Lilleskov; Louis James Lamit; James Shannon; Matthew Brewer; Samantha Grover
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.192

3.  Soil Viruses Are Underexplored Players in Ecosystem Carbon Processing.

Authors:  Gareth Trubl; Ho Bin Jang; Simon Roux; Joanne B Emerson; Natalie Solonenko; Dean R Vik; Lindsey Solden; Jared Ellenbogen; Alexander T Runyon; Benjamin Bolduc; Ben J Woodcroft; Scott R Saleska; Gene W Tyson; Kelly C Wrighton; Matthew B Sullivan; Virginia I Rich
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 6.496

4.  Hydrolytic Capabilities as a Key to Environmental Success: Chitinolytic and Cellulolytic Acidobacteria From Acidic Sub-arctic Soils and Boreal Peatlands.

Authors:  Svetlana E Belova; Nikolai V Ravin; Timofey A Pankratov; Andrey L Rakitin; Anastasia A Ivanova; Alexey V Beletsky; Andrey V Mardanov; Jaap S Sinninghe Damsté; Svetlana N Dedysh
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Wetland Sediments Host Diverse Microbial Taxa Capable of Cycling Alcohols.

Authors:  Paula Dalcin Martins; Jeroen Frank; Hugh Mitchell; Lye Meng Markillie; Michael J Wilkins
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Mercury methylating microbial communities of boreal forest soils.

Authors:  Jingying Xu; Moritz Buck; Karin Eklöf; Omneya O Ahmed; Jeffra K Schaefer; Kevin Bishop; Ulf Skyllberg; Erik Björn; Stefan Bertilsson; Andrea G Bravo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Rare Species Shift the Structure of Bacterial Communities Across Sphagnum Compartments in a Subalpine Peatland.

Authors:  Wen Tian; Xing Xiang; Liyuan Ma; Stephanie Evers; Ruicheng Wang; Xuan Qiu; Hongmei Wang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Linking prokaryotic community composition to carbon biogeochemical cycling across a tropical peat dome in Sarawak, Malaysia.

Authors:  Simon Peter Dom; Makoto Ikenaga; Sharon Yu Ling Lau; Son Radu; Frazer Midot; Mui Lan Yap; Mei-Yee Chin; Mei Lieng Lo; Mui Sie Jee; Nagamitsu Maie; Lulie Melling
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Peatland Acidobacteria with a dissimilatory sulfur metabolism.

Authors:  Bela Hausmann; Claus Pelikan; Craig W Herbold; Stephan Köstlbacher; Mads Albertsen; Stephanie A Eichorst; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Martin Huemer; Per H Nielsen; Thomas Rattei; Ulrich Stingl; Susannah G Tringe; Daniela Trojan; Cecilia Wentrup; Dagmar Woebken; Michael Pester; Alexander Loy
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 10.302

10.  New Biological Insights Into How Deforestation in Amazonia Affects Soil Microbial Communities Using Metagenomics and Metagenome-Assembled Genomes.

Authors:  Marie E Kroeger; Tom O Delmont; A M Eren; Kyle M Meyer; Jiarong Guo; Kiran Khan; Jorge L M Rodrigues; Brendan J M Bohannan; Susannah G Tringe; Clovis D Borges; James M Tiedje; Siu M Tsai; Klaus Nüsslein
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 5.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.