Linda K Larkey1, Denise J Roe2, Lisa Smith3, Denise Millstine4. 1. Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, 500 N. 3rd Street, Phoenix, AZ 85004, United States. Electronic address: Linda.larkey@asu.edu. 2. Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, 1515 N. Campbell Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85724-5024, United States. 3. Exercise Science and Health Promotion, Arizona State University, 500 N. 3rd Street, Phoenix AZ 85004, United States. 4. Women's Health Internal Medicine and Integrative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 13737 N. 92nd Street, Scottsdale, AZ 85260, United States.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:Breast cancer survivors (BCSs) experience symptoms affecting overall quality of life (QOL), often for a prolonged period post-treatment. Meditative Movement (MM), including Qigong and Tai Chi Easy (QG/TCE), has demonstrated benefit for improving QOL issues such as fatigue and sleep, but there is limited evidence of its impact on cognitive function, overall physical activity, and body weight for BCSs. DESIGN: This double-blind, randomized controlled pilot study with 87 female BCSs explored effects of QG/TCE on mental and physical QOL (Medical Outcomes Survey, Short Form), cognitive function (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function and two cognitive performance tests from the WAIS III), overall levels of physical activity (PA)(Brief Physical Activity Questionnaire) and body mass index (BMI). INTERVENTIONS: Twelve weekly sessions of QG/TCE were compared to sham Qigong (SQG), a gentle movement control intervention similar to QG/TCE but without the focus on breathing and meditative state. RESULTS: Both groups demonstrated pre-to-post-intervention improvements in physical and mental health, level of PA, self-reported cognitive function, and cognitive performance tests, though without significant differences between QG/TCE and SQG. For a subset of women enrolled later in the study, a significant reduction in BMI [-0.66 (p=0.048)] was found for QG/TCE compared to SQG. CONCLUSIONS: Practices that include gentle movement (such as QG/TCE or our sham protocol) among women with a history of breast cancer may improve many facets of the cancer experience, including QOL, cognitive function, and PA patterns. Practicing QG/TCE may show some advantage for BMI reduction compared to non-meditative gentle exercise. Copyright Â
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE:Breast cancer survivors (BCSs) experience symptoms affecting overall quality of life (QOL), often for a prolonged period post-treatment. Meditative Movement (MM), including Qigong and Tai Chi Easy (QG/TCE), has demonstrated benefit for improving QOL issues such as fatigue and sleep, but there is limited evidence of its impact on cognitive function, overall physical activity, and body weight for BCSs. DESIGN: This double-blind, randomized controlled pilot study with 87 female BCSs explored effects of QG/TCE on mental and physical QOL (Medical Outcomes Survey, Short Form), cognitive function (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function and two cognitive performance tests from the WAIS III), overall levels of physical activity (PA)(Brief Physical Activity Questionnaire) and body mass index (BMI). INTERVENTIONS: Twelve weekly sessions of QG/TCE were compared to sham Qigong (SQG), a gentle movement control intervention similar to QG/TCE but without the focus on breathing and meditative state. RESULTS: Both groups demonstrated pre-to-post-intervention improvements in physical and mental health, level of PA, self-reported cognitive function, and cognitive performance tests, though without significant differences between QG/TCE and SQG. For a subset of women enrolled later in the study, a significant reduction in BMI [-0.66 (p=0.048)] was found for QG/TCE compared to SQG. CONCLUSIONS: Practices that include gentle movement (such as QG/TCE or our sham protocol) among women with a history of breast cancer may improve many facets of the cancer experience, including QOL, cognitive function, and PA patterns. Practicing QG/TCE may show some advantage for BMI reduction compared to non-meditative gentle exercise. Copyright Â
Authors: Julienne E Bower; Deborah Garet; Beth Sternlieb; Patricia A Ganz; Michael R Irwin; Richard Olmstead; Gail Greendale Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-12-16 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Michelle C Janelsins; Paul G Davis; Laurie Wideman; Jeffrey A Katula; Lisa K Sprod; Luke J Peppone; Oxana G Palesh; Charles E Heckler; Jacqueline P Williams; Gary R Morrow; Karen M Mustian Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2011-04-20 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Julienne E Bower; Patricia A Ganz; Michael R Irwin; Lorna Kwan; Elizabeth C Breen; Steve W Cole Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-08-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ana Claudia Garabeli Cavalli Kluthcovsky; Almir Antonio Urbanetz; Denise Siqueira de Carvalho; Eliane Mara Cesario Pereira Maluf; Geovana Cristina Schlickmann Sylvestre; Sergio Bruno Bonatto Hatschbach Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2011-10-13 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: James W Carson; Kimberly M Carson; Laura S Porter; Francis J Keefe; Victoria L Seewaldt Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2009-02-12 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Alyson B Moadel; Chirag Shah; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Melanie S Harris; Sapana R Patel; Charles B Hall; Joseph A Sparano Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-09-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Xiaosha Ni; Raymond Javan Chan; Patsy Yates; Wenyi Hu; Xianhong Huang; Yan Lou Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-06-24 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Sheri J Hartman; Sandahl H Nelson; Emily Myers; Loki Natarajan; Dorothy D Sears; Barton W Palmer; Lauren S Weiner; Barbara A Parker; Ruth E Patterson Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-09-19 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Peter M Wayne; M S Lee; J Novakowski; K Osypiuk; J Ligibel; L E Carlson; R Song Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2017-12-08 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Nadia Miladi; Richi Dossa; Maman Joyce Dogba; Marie Immacula Fabienne Cléophat-Jolicoeur; Bruno Gagnon Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-06-28 Impact factor: 3.603