Sheri J Hartman1,2, Sandahl H Nelson1,2, Emily Myers2, Loki Natarajan1,2, Dorothy D Sears1,2,3, Barton W Palmer4,5, Lauren S Weiner1,2, Barbara A Parker2,3, Ruth E Patterson1,2. 1. Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California. 2. University of California-San Diego Moores Cancer Center, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California. 3. Department of Medicine, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California. 4. Department of Psychiatry, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California. 5. Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Increasing physical activity can improve cognition in healthy and cognitively impaired adults; however, the benefits for cancer survivors are unknown. The current study examined a 12-week physical activity intervention, compared with a control condition, on objective and self-reported cognition among breast cancer survivors. METHODS:Sedentary breast cancer survivors were randomized to an exercise arm (n = 43) or a control arm (n = 44). At baseline and at 12 weeks, objective cognition was measured with the National Institutes of Health Cognitive Toolbox, and self-reported cognition using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scales. Linear mixed-effects regression models tested intervention effects for changes in cognition scores. RESULTS: On average, participants (n = 87) were aged 57 years (standard deviation, 10.4 years) and were 2.5 years (standard deviation, 1.3 years) post surgery. Scores on the Oral Symbol Digit subscale (a measure of processing speed) evidenced differential improvement in the exercise arm versus the control arm (b = 2.01; P < .05). The between-group differences in improvement on self-reported cognition were not statistically significant but were suggestive of potential group differences. Time since surgery moderated the correlation, and participants who were ≤2 years post surgery had a significantly greater improvement in Oral Symbol Digit score (exercise vs control (b = 4.00; P < .01), but no significant improvement was observed in patients who were >2 years postsurgery (b = -1.19; P = .40). A significant dose response was observed with greater increased physical activity associated with objective and self-reported cognition in the exercise arm. CONCLUSIONS: The exercise intervention significantly improved processing speed, but only among those who had been diagnosed with breast cancer within the past 2 years. Slowed processing speed can have substantial implications for independent functioning, supporting the potential importance of early implementation of an exercise intervention among patients with breast cancer. Cancer 2018;124:192-202.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Increasing physical activity can improve cognition in healthy and cognitively impaired adults; however, the benefits for cancer survivors are unknown. The current study examined a 12-week physical activity intervention, compared with a control condition, on objective and self-reported cognition among breast cancer survivors. METHODS:Sedentary breast cancer survivors were randomized to an exercise arm (n = 43) or a control arm (n = 44). At baseline and at 12 weeks, objective cognition was measured with the National Institutes of Health Cognitive Toolbox, and self-reported cognition using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scales. Linear mixed-effects regression models tested intervention effects for changes in cognition scores. RESULTS: On average, participants (n = 87) were aged 57 years (standard deviation, 10.4 years) and were 2.5 years (standard deviation, 1.3 years) post surgery. Scores on the Oral Symbol Digit subscale (a measure of processing speed) evidenced differential improvement in the exercise arm versus the control arm (b = 2.01; P < .05). The between-group differences in improvement on self-reported cognition were not statistically significant but were suggestive of potential group differences. Time since surgery moderated the correlation, and participants who were ≤2 years post surgery had a significantly greater improvement in Oral Symbol Digit score (exercise vs control (b = 4.00; P < .01), but no significant improvement was observed in patients who were >2 years postsurgery (b = -1.19; P = .40). A significant dose response was observed with greater increased physical activity associated with objective and self-reported cognition in the exercise arm. CONCLUSIONS: The exercise intervention significantly improved processing speed, but only among those who had been diagnosed with breast cancer within the past 2 years. Slowed processing speed can have substantial implications for independent functioning, supporting the potential importance of early implementation of an exercise intervention among patients with breast cancer. Cancer 2018;124:192-202.
Authors: K L Campbell; J W Y Kam; S E Neil-Sztramko; T Liu Ambrose; T C Handy; H J Lim; S Hayden; L Hsu; A A Kirkham; C C Gotay; D C McKenzie; L A Boyd Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2017-02-10 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Patrick J Smith; James A Blumenthal; Benson M Hoffman; Harris Cooper; Timothy A Strauman; Kathleen Welsh-Bohmer; Jeffrey N Browndyke; Andrew Sherwood Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2010-03-11 Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Brigid M Lynch; David W Dunstan; Genevieve N Healy; Elisabeth Winkler; Elizabeth Eakin; Neville Owen Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2009-11-01 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Daniel Y T Fong; Judy W C Ho; Bryant P H Hui; Antoinette M Lee; Duncan J Macfarlane; Sharron S K Leung; Ester Cerin; Wynnie Y Y Chan; Ivy P F Leung; Sharon H S Lam; Aliki J Taylor; Kar-keung Cheng Journal: BMJ Date: 2012-01-30
Authors: Kevin T Liou; James C Root; Sheila N Garland; Jamie Green; Yuelin Li; Q Susan Li; Philip W Kantoff; Tim A Ahles; Jun J Mao Journal: Cancer Date: 2020-04-22 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Mackenzi Pergolotti; Nicolò Matteo Luca Battisti; Lynne Padgett; Alix G Sleight; Maya Abdallah; Robin Newman; Kathleen Van Dyk; Kelley R Covington; Grant R Williams; Frederiek van den Bos; YaoYao Pollock; Elizabeth A Salerno; Allison Magnuson; Isabella F Gattás-Vernaglia; Tim A Ahles Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2019-10-14 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: M Lange; F Joly; J Vardy; T Ahles; M Dubois; L Tron; G Winocur; M B De Ruiter; H Castel Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2019-12-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Jeanne M Ferrante; Katie A Devine; Alicja Bator; Ashley Rodgers; Pamela A Ohman-Strickland; Elisa V Bandera; Kevin O Hwang Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2020-10-08 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Sheri J Hartman; Sandahl H Nelson; Catherine R Marinac; Loki Natarajan; Barbara A Parker; Ruth E Patterson Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2019-06-27 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Amanda L Gentry; Kirk I Erickson; Susan M Sereika; Frances E Casillo; Mary E Crisafio; Patrick T Donahue; George A Grove; Anna L Marsland; Jennifer C Watt; Catherine M Bender Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-03-06 Impact factor: 2.226