Ahmed Hamed Salem1,2, Beibei Hu3, Kevin J Freise3, Suresh K Agarwal3, Dilraj S Sidhu3, Shekman L Wong3. 1. Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, AbbVie Inc., 1 North Waukegan Road, North Chicago, IL, 60064, USA. ahmed.salem@abbvie.com. 2. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. ahmed.salem@abbvie.com. 3. Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, AbbVie Inc., 1 North Waukegan Road, North Chicago, IL, 60064, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Venetoclax is a selective, B-cell lymphoma-2 inhibitor that has demonstrated clinical efficacy in a variety of hematological malignancies. In vitro data indicated weak cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 inhibition by venetoclax; however, it is not predicted to cause clinically relevant inhibition due to high plasma protein binding. A Phase 1 study was conducted in healthy volunteers to evaluate the effect of venetoclax on warfarin pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Subjects received a single oral dose of 5 mg warfarin on day 1 of both periods 1 and 2, separated by a 14 days washout. On day 1 of period 2, subjects concomitantly received a single 400 mg oral dose of venetoclax. Blood samples for warfarin concentration determination were collected after each dose administration for up to 9 days. RESULTS: Modest increases of 18 to 28% were observed in the maximum observed plasma concentration (C max) and area under the curve from time zero to infinity (AUC∞) of both R- and S-warfarin. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the narrow therapeutic window of warfarin, it is recommended that the international normalized ratio (INR) be monitored closely in patients receiving venetoclax and warfarin. Since similar increases in exposure were observed for both enantiomers, even though CYP2C9 is only involved in the metabolism of the S-enantiomer, and the half-life of both enantiomers remained the same, the interaction does not appear to be mediated via CYP2C9.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:Venetoclax is a selective, B-cell lymphoma-2 inhibitor that has demonstrated clinical efficacy in a variety of hematological malignancies. In vitro data indicated weak cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 inhibition by venetoclax; however, it is not predicted to cause clinically relevant inhibition due to high plasma protein binding. A Phase 1 study was conducted in healthy volunteers to evaluate the effect of venetoclax on warfarin pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Subjects received a single oral dose of 5 mg warfarin on day 1 of both periods 1 and 2, separated by a 14 days washout. On day 1 of period 2, subjects concomitantly received a single 400 mg oral dose of venetoclax. Blood samples for warfarin concentration determination were collected after each dose administration for up to 9 days. RESULTS: Modest increases of 18 to 28% were observed in the maximum observed plasma concentration (C max) and area under the curve from time zero to infinity (AUC∞) of both R- and S-warfarin. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the narrow therapeutic window of warfarin, it is recommended that the international normalized ratio (INR) be monitored closely in patients receiving venetoclax and warfarin. Since similar increases in exposure were observed for both enantiomers, even though CYP2C9 is only involved in the metabolism of the S-enantiomer, and the half-life of both enantiomers remained the same, the interaction does not appear to be mediated via CYP2C9.
Authors: Kevin J Freise; Aksana K Jones; Doerthe Eckert; Sven Mensing; Shekman L Wong; Rod A Humerickhouse; Walid M Awni; Ahmed Hamed Salem Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Aksana K Jones; Kevin J Freise; Suresh K Agarwal; Rod A Humerickhouse; Shekman L Wong; Ahmed Hamed Salem Journal: AAPS J Date: 2016-05-27 Impact factor: 4.009
Authors: Stephan Stilgenbauer; Barbara Eichhorst; Johannes Schetelig; Steven Coutre; John F Seymour; Talha Munir; Soham D Puvvada; Clemens-Martin Wendtner; Andrew W Roberts; Wojciech Jurczak; Stephen P Mulligan; Sebastian Böttcher; Mehrdad Mobasher; Ming Zhu; Monali Desai; Brenda Chyla; Maria Verdugo; Sari Heitner Enschede; Elisa Cerri; Rod Humerickhouse; Gary Gordon; Michael Hallek; William G Wierda Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2016-05-10 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Ahmed Hamed Salem; Suresh K Agarwal; Martin Dunbar; Sari L Heitner Enschede; Rod A Humerickhouse; Shekman L Wong Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: Marina Konopleva; Daniel A Pollyea; Jalaja Potluri; Brenda Chyla; Leah Hogdal; Todd Busman; Evelyn McKeegan; Ahmed Hamed Salem; Ming Zhu; Justin L Ricker; William Blum; Courtney D DiNardo; Tapan Kadia; Martin Dunbar; Rachel Kirby; Nancy Falotico; Joel Leverson; Rod Humerickhouse; Mack Mabry; Richard Stone; Hagop Kantarjian; Anthony Letai Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2016-08-12 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: M Wadelius; K Sörlin; O Wallerman; J Karlsson; Q-Y Yue; P K E Magnusson; C Wadelius; H Melhus Journal: Pharmacogenomics J Date: 2004 Impact factor: 3.550
Authors: Andrew W Roberts; Matthew S Davids; John M Pagel; Brad S Kahl; Soham D Puvvada; John F Gerecitano; Thomas J Kipps; Mary Ann Anderson; Jennifer R Brown; Lori Gressick; Shekman Wong; Martin Dunbar; Ming Zhu; Monali B Desai; Elisa Cerri; Sari Heitner Enschede; Rod A Humerickhouse; William G Wierda; John F Seymour Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-12-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Suresh K Agarwal; Ahmed Hamed Salem; Alexey V Danilov; Beibei Hu; Soham Puvvada; Martin Gutierrez; David Chien; Lionel D Lewis; Shekman L Wong Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2017-01-18 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Seth E Karol; Thomas B Alexander; Amit Budhraja; Stanley B Pounds; Kristin Canavera; Lei Wang; Joshua Wolf; Jeffery M Klco; Paul E Mead; Soumyasri Das Gupta; Su Y Kim; Ahmed Hamed Salem; Tammy Palenski; Norman J Lacayo; Ching-Hon Pui; Joseph T Opferman; Jeffrey E Rubnitz Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2020-03-11 Impact factor: 41.316