Ahmed Hamed Salem1,2, Nimita Dave3, Thomas Marbury4, Beibei Hu3, Dale Miles5, Suresh K Agarwal3, Orlando F Bueno3, Rajeev M Menon3. 1. AbbVie Inc., 1 North Waukegan Road, North Chicago, IL, 60064, USA. ahmed.salem@abbvie.com. 2. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. ahmed.salem@abbvie.com. 3. AbbVie Inc., 1 North Waukegan Road, North Chicago, IL, 60064, USA. 4. Orlando Clinical Research Center, Orlando, FL, 32809-3017, USA. 5. Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Venetoclax is a selective B cell lymphoma-2 inhibitor. It is approved for treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and is being investigated for other hematological malignancies. Venetoclax is predominantly eliminated by the liver; therefore, there is a need to investigate the effect of hepatic insufficiency on venetoclax pharmacokinetics. METHODS: A phase I study was carried out in 24 women with normal hepatic function or mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment (based on Child-Pugh scores), who received a single 50 mg dose of venetoclax with a low-fat meal. Blood samples were collected up to 120 h after venetoclax administration. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using non-compartmental methods. RESULTS: Venetoclax maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment were similar to subjects with normal hepatic function. Mean venetoclax AUC in subjects with severe hepatic impairment was 2.3- to 2.7-fold higher than in subjects with normal hepatic function. The half-life of venetoclax in subjects with severe hepatic impairment was approximately two-fold longer than in subjects with normal hepatic function and subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment. Unbound fractions of venetoclax in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment were similar to the subjects with normal hepatic function. No significant adverse safety events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: No venetoclax dosage adjustment is required in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment. In subjects with severe hepatic impairment, a 50% dose reduction of venetoclax is recommended to account for higher exposures and the longer half-life.
INTRODUCTION:Venetoclax is a selective B cell lymphoma-2 inhibitor. It is approved for treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and is being investigated for other hematological malignancies. Venetoclax is predominantly eliminated by the liver; therefore, there is a need to investigate the effect of hepatic insufficiency on venetoclax pharmacokinetics. METHODS: A phase I study was carried out in 24 women with normal hepatic function or mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment (based on Child-Pugh scores), who received a single 50 mg dose of venetoclax with a low-fat meal. Blood samples were collected up to 120 h after venetoclax administration. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using non-compartmental methods. RESULTS:Venetoclax maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment were similar to subjects with normal hepatic function. Mean venetoclax AUC in subjects with severe hepatic impairment was 2.3- to 2.7-fold higher than in subjects with normal hepatic function. The half-life of venetoclax in subjects with severe hepatic impairment was approximately two-fold longer than in subjects with normal hepatic function and subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment. Unbound fractions of venetoclax in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment were similar to the subjects with normal hepatic function. No significant adverse safety events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: No venetoclax dosage adjustment is required in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment. In subjects with severe hepatic impairment, a 50% dose reduction of venetoclax is recommended to account for higher exposures and the longer half-life.
Authors: Kevin J Freise; Aksana K Jones; Doerthe Eckert; Sven Mensing; Shekman L Wong; Rod A Humerickhouse; Walid M Awni; Ahmed Hamed Salem Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Kevin J Freise; Martin Dunbar; Aksana K Jones; David Hoffman; Sari L Heitner Enschede; Shekman Wong; Ahmed Hamed Salem Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Patricia M LoRusso; Karthik Venkatakrishnan; Ramesh K Ramanathan; John Sarantopoulos; Daniel Mulkerin; Stephen I Shibata; Anne Hamilton; Afshin Dowlati; Sridhar Mani; Michelle A Rudek; Chris H Takimoto; Rachel Neuwirth; Dixie-Lee Esseltine; Percy Ivy Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-03-06 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Aksana K Jones; Kevin J Freise; Suresh K Agarwal; Rod A Humerickhouse; Shekman L Wong; Ahmed Hamed Salem Journal: AAPS J Date: 2016-05-27 Impact factor: 4.009
Authors: Suresh S Ramalingam; Shivaani Kummar; John Sarantopoulos; Stephen Shibata; Patricia LoRusso; Mara Yerk; Julianne Holleran; Yan Lin; Jan H Beumer; R Donald Harvey; S Percy Ivy; Chandra P Belani; Merrill J Egorin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-09-13 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ahmed Hamed Salem; Suresh K Agarwal; Martin Dunbar; Sari L Heitner Enschede; Rod A Humerickhouse; Shekman L Wong Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: Ahmed Hamed Salem; Suresh K Agarwal; Martin Dunbar; Silpa Nuthalapati; David Chien; Kevin J Freise; Shekman L Wong Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: Andrew W Roberts; Matthew S Davids; John M Pagel; Brad S Kahl; Soham D Puvvada; John F Gerecitano; Thomas J Kipps; Mary Ann Anderson; Jennifer R Brown; Lori Gressick; Shekman Wong; Martin Dunbar; Ming Zhu; Monali B Desai; Elisa Cerri; Sari Heitner Enschede; Rod A Humerickhouse; William G Wierda; John F Seymour Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-12-06 Impact factor: 91.245