Seth E Karol1, Thomas B Alexander2, Amit Budhraja3, Stanley B Pounds4, Kristin Canavera5, Lei Wang4, Joshua Wolf6, Jeffery M Klco7, Paul E Mead7, Soumyasri Das Gupta3, Su Y Kim8, Ahmed Hamed Salem9, Tammy Palenski8, Norman J Lacayo10, Ching-Hon Pui1, Joseph T Opferman3, Jeffrey E Rubnitz11. 1. Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA. 2. Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 3. Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA. 4. Department of Biostatistics, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA. 5. Department of Psychology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA. 6. Department of Infectious Diseases, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA. 7. Department of Pathology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA. 8. AbbVie, North Chicago, IL, USA. 9. AbbVie, North Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. 10. Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA. 11. Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA. Electronic address: jeffrey.rubnitz@stjude.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Outcomes for children with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia remain poor. The BCL-2 inhibitor, venetoclax, has shown promising activity in combination with hypomethylating agents and low-dose cytarabine in older adults for whom chemotherapy is not suitable with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia. We aimed to determine the safety and explore the activity of venetoclax in combination with standard and high-dose chemotherapy in paediatric patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia. METHODS: We did a phase 1, dose-escalation study at three research hospitals in the USA. Eligible patients were aged 2-22 years with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia or acute leukaemia of ambiguous lineage with adequate organ function and performance status. During dose escalation, participants received venetoclax orally once per day in continuous 28-day cycles at either 240 mg/m2 or 360 mg/m2, in combination with cytarabine received intravenously every 12 h at either 100 mg/m2 for 20 doses or 1000 mg/m2 for eight doses, with or without intravenous idarubicin (12 mg/m2) as a single dose, using a rolling-6 accrual strategy. The primary endpoint was the recommended phase 2 dose of venetoclax plus chemotherapy and the secondary endpoint was the proportion of patients treated at the recommended phase 2 dose who achieved complete remission or complete remission with incomplete haematological recovery. Analyses were done on patients who received combination therapy. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03194932) and is now enrolling to address secondary and exploratory objectives. FINDINGS: Between July 1, 2017, and July 2, 2019, 38 patients were enrolled (aged 3-22 years; median 10 [IQR 7-13]), 36 of whom received combination therapy with dose escalation, with a median follow-up of 7·1 months (IQR 5·1-11·2). The recommended phase 2 dose of venetoclax was found to be 360 mg/m2 (maximum 600 mg) combined with cytarabine (1000 mg/m2 per dose for eight doses), with or without idarubicin (12 mg/m2 as a single dose). Overall responses were observed in 24 (69%) of the 35 patients who were evaluable after cycle 1. Among the 20 patients treated at the recommended phase 2 dose, 14 (70%, 95% CI 46-88) showed complete response with or without complete haematological recovery, and two (10%) showed partial response. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were febrile neutropenia (22 [66%]), bloodstream infections (six [16%]), and invasive fungal infections (six [16%]). Treatment-related death occurred in one patient due to colitis and sepsis. INTERPRETATION: The safety and activity of venetoclax plus chemotherapy in paediatric patients with heavily relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukaemia suggests that this combination should be tested in newly diagnosed paediatric patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukaemia. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health, American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities, AbbVie, and Gateway for Cancer Research.
BACKGROUND: Outcomes for children with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia remain poor. The BCL-2 inhibitor, venetoclax, has shown promising activity in combination with hypomethylating agents and low-dose cytarabine in older adults for whom chemotherapy is not suitable with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia. We aimed to determine the safety and explore the activity of venetoclax in combination with standard and high-dose chemotherapy in paediatric patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia. METHODS: We did a phase 1, dose-escalation study at three research hospitals in the USA. Eligible patients were aged 2-22 years with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia or acute leukaemia of ambiguous lineage with adequate organ function and performance status. During dose escalation, participants received venetoclax orally once per day in continuous 28-day cycles at either 240 mg/m2 or 360 mg/m2, in combination with cytarabine received intravenously every 12 h at either 100 mg/m2 for 20 doses or 1000 mg/m2 for eight doses, with or without intravenous idarubicin (12 mg/m2) as a single dose, using a rolling-6 accrual strategy. The primary endpoint was the recommended phase 2 dose of venetoclax plus chemotherapy and the secondary endpoint was the proportion of patients treated at the recommended phase 2 dose who achieved complete remission or complete remission with incomplete haematological recovery. Analyses were done on patients who received combination therapy. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03194932) and is now enrolling to address secondary and exploratory objectives. FINDINGS: Between July 1, 2017, and July 2, 2019, 38 patients were enrolled (aged 3-22 years; median 10 [IQR 7-13]), 36 of whom received combination therapy with dose escalation, with a median follow-up of 7·1 months (IQR 5·1-11·2). The recommended phase 2 dose of venetoclax was found to be 360 mg/m2 (maximum 600 mg) combined with cytarabine (1000 mg/m2 per dose for eight doses), with or without idarubicin (12 mg/m2 as a single dose). Overall responses were observed in 24 (69%) of the 35 patients who were evaluable after cycle 1. Among the 20 patients treated at the recommended phase 2 dose, 14 (70%, 95% CI 46-88) showed complete response with or without complete haematological recovery, and two (10%) showed partial response. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were febrile neutropenia (22 [66%]), bloodstream infections (six [16%]), and invasive fungal infections (six [16%]). Treatment-related death occurred in one patient due to colitis and sepsis. INTERPRETATION: The safety and activity of venetoclax plus chemotherapy in paediatric patients with heavily relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukaemia suggests that this combination should be tested in newly diagnosed paediatric patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukaemia. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health, American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities, AbbVie, and Gateway for Cancer Research.
Authors: T-C Teh; N-Y Nguyen; D M Moujalled; D Segal; G Pomilio; S Rijal; A Jabbour; K Cummins; K Lackovic; P Blombery; E Thompson; P G Ekert; G Lessene; S P Glaser; D C S Huang; A W Roberts; M A Guthridge; A H Wei Journal: Leukemia Date: 2017-07-28 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Suresh K Agarwal; Ahmed Hamed Salem; Alexey V Danilov; Beibei Hu; Soham Puvvada; Martin Gutierrez; David Chien; Lionel D Lewis; Shekman L Wong Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2017-01-18 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Ibrahim Aldoss; Dongyun Yang; Ahmed Aribi; Haris Ali; Karamjeet Sandhu; Monzr M Al Malki; Matthew Mei; Amandeep Salhotra; Samer Khaled; Ryotaro Nakamura; David Snyder; Margaret O'Donnell; Anthony S Stein; Stephen J Forman; Guido Marcucci; Vinod Pullarkat Journal: Haematologica Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Marina Konopleva; Daniel A Pollyea; Jalaja Potluri; Brenda Chyla; Leah Hogdal; Todd Busman; Evelyn McKeegan; Ahmed Hamed Salem; Ming Zhu; Justin L Ricker; William Blum; Courtney D DiNardo; Tapan Kadia; Martin Dunbar; Rachel Kirby; Nancy Falotico; Joel Leverson; Rod Humerickhouse; Mack Mabry; Richard Stone; Hagop Kantarjian; Anthony Letai Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2016-08-12 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Alan S Gamis; Todd A Alonzo; Soheil Meshinchi; Lillian Sung; Robert B Gerbing; Susana C Raimondi; Betsy A Hirsch; Samir B Kahwash; Amy Heerema-McKenney; Laura Winter; Kathleen Glick; Stella M Davies; Patti Byron; Franklin O Smith; Richard Aplenc Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-09-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Gertjan J L Kaspers; Martin Zimmermann; Dirk Reinhardt; Brenda E S Gibson; Rienk Y J Tamminga; Olga Aleinikova; Hortensia Armendariz; Michael Dworzak; Shau-Yin Ha; Henrik Hasle; Liisa Hovi; Alexei Maschan; Yves Bertrand; Guy G Leverger; Bassem I Razzouk; Carmelo Rizzari; Petr Smisek; Owen Smith; Batia Stark; Ursula Creutzig Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-01-14 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Courtney D DiNardo; Keith W Pratz; Anthony Letai; Brian A Jonas; Andrew H Wei; Michael Thirman; Martha Arellano; Mark G Frattini; Hagop Kantarjian; Relja Popovic; Brenda Chyla; Tu Xu; Martin Dunbar; Suresh K Agarwal; Rod Humerickhouse; Mack Mabry; Jalaja Potluri; Marina Konopleva; Daniel A Pollyea Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2018-01-12 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Andrew H Wei; Stephen A Strickland; Jing-Zhou Hou; Walter Fiedler; Tara L Lin; Roland B Walter; Anoop Enjeti; Ing Soo Tiong; Michael Savona; Sangmin Lee; Brenda Chyla; Relja Popovic; Ahmed Hamed Salem; Suresh Agarwal; Tu Xu; Kaffa M Fakouhi; Rod Humerickhouse; Wan-Jen Hong; John Hayslip; Gail J Roboz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2019-03-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Fabiana Cacace; Rossella Iula; Danilo De Novellis; Valeria Caprioli; Maria Rosaria D'Amico; Giuseppina De Simone; Rosanna Cuccurullo; William G Wierda; Kris Michael Mahadeo; Giuseppe Menna; Francesco Paolo Tambaro Journal: Biomedicines Date: 2022-06-14
Authors: Lauren Pommert; Eric S Schafer; Jemily Malvar; Nathan Gossai; Ellynore Florendo; Kirthi Pulakanti; Katelyn Heimbruch; Cary Stelloh; Yueh-Yun Chi; Richard Sposto; Sridhar Rao; Van Thu Huynh; Patrick Brown; Bill H Chang; Susan I Colace; Michelle L Hermiston; Kenneth Heym; Raymond J Hutchinson; Joel A Kaplan; Rajen Mody; Tracey A O'Brien; Andrew E Place; Peter H Shaw; David S Ziegler; Alan Wayne; Deepa Bhojwani; Michael J Burke Journal: Am J Hematol Date: 2022-03-08 Impact factor: 13.265
Authors: Kenneth J Caldwell; Amit Budhraja; Joseph T Opferman; Ching-Hon Pui; Jeffery M Klco; Jeffrey E Rubnitz Journal: Cancer Date: 2021-04-06 Impact factor: 6.921
Authors: Vinod A Pullarkat; Norman J Lacayo; Elias Jabbour; Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Ashish Bajel; Theodore W Laetsch; Jessica Leonard; Susan I Colace; Seong Lin Khaw; Shaun A Fleming; Ryan J Mattison; Robin Norris; Joseph T Opferman; Kathryn G Roberts; Yaqi Zhao; Chunxu Qu; Mohamed Badawi; Michelle Schmidt; Bo Tong; John C Pesko; Yan Sun; Jeremy A Ross; Deeksha Vishwamitra; Lindsey Rosenwinkel; Su Young Kim; Amanda Jacobson; Charles G Mullighan; Thomas B Alexander; Wendy Stock Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2021-02-16 Impact factor: 38.272
Authors: John C Molina; Julie M Asare; Laura Tuschong; Robert R West; Katherine R Calvo; Rebecca Persky; Alison M Boyce; Dima A Hammoud; Steven M Holland; Dennis Hickstein; Nirali N Shah Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2020-12-27 Impact factor: 3.838
Authors: Jeffrey J Bednarski; Clare Zimmerman; Melissa M Berrien-Elliott; Jennifer A Foltz; Michelle Becker-Hapak; Carly C Neal; Mark Foster; Timothy Schappe; Ethan McClain; Patrick P Pence; Sweta Desai; Samantha Kersting-Schadek; Pamela Wong; David A Russler-Germain; Bryan Fisk; Wen-Rong Lie; Jeremy Eisele; Stephanie Hyde; Sima T Bhatt; Obi L Griffith; Malachi Griffith; Allegra A Petti; Amanda F Cashen; Todd A Fehniger Journal: Blood Date: 2022-03-17 Impact factor: 25.476