Neil A Segal1,2, John Bergin3, Andrew Kern3, Christian Findlay3, Donald D Anderson4. 1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Mailstop 1046, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA. segal-research@kumc.edu. 2. The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA. segal-research@kumc.edu. 3. The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA. 4. Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the test-retest reliability of knee joint space width (JSW) measurements made using standing CT (SCT) imaging. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This prospective two-visit study included 50 knees from 30 subjects (66% female; mean ± SD age 58.2 ± 11.3 years; BMI 29.1 ± 5.6 kg/m2; 38% KL grade 0-1). Tibiofemoral geometry was obtained from bilateral, approximately 20° fixed-flexed SCT images acquired at visits 2 weeks apart. For each compartment, the total joint area was defined as the area with a JSW <10 mm. The summary measurements of interest were the percentage of the total joint area with a JSW less than 0.5-mm thresholds between 2.0 and 5.0 mm in each tibiofemoral compartment. Test-retest reliability of the summary JSW measurements was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC 2,1) for the percentage area engaged at each threshold of JSW and root-mean-square errors (RMSE) were calculated to assess reproducibility. RESULTS: The ICCs were excellent for each threshold assessed, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 for the lateral and 0.90 to 0.97 for the medial compartment. RMSE ranged from 1.1 to 7.2% for the lateral and from 3.1 to 9.1% for the medial compartment, with better reproducibility at smaller JSW thresholds. CONCLUSION: The knee joint positioning protocol used demonstrated high day-to-day reliability for SCT 3D tibiofemoral JSW summary measurements repeated 2 weeks apart. Low-dose SCT provides a great deal of information about the joint while maintaining high reliability, making it a suitable alternative to plain radiographs for evaluating JSW in people with knee OA.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the test-retest reliability of knee joint space width (JSW) measurements made using standing CT (SCT) imaging. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This prospective two-visit study included 50 knees from 30 subjects (66% female; mean ± SD age 58.2 ± 11.3 years; BMI 29.1 ± 5.6 kg/m2; 38% KL grade 0-1). Tibiofemoral geometry was obtained from bilateral, approximately 20° fixed-flexed SCT images acquired at visits 2 weeks apart. For each compartment, the total joint area was defined as the area with a JSW <10 mm. The summary measurements of interest were the percentage of the total joint area with a JSW less than 0.5-mm thresholds between 2.0 and 5.0 mm in each tibiofemoral compartment. Test-retest reliability of the summary JSW measurements was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC 2,1) for the percentage area engaged at each threshold of JSW and root-mean-square errors (RMSE) were calculated to assess reproducibility. RESULTS: The ICCs were excellent for each threshold assessed, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 for the lateral and 0.90 to 0.97 for the medial compartment. RMSE ranged from 1.1 to 7.2% for the lateral and from 3.1 to 9.1% for the medial compartment, with better reproducibility at smaller JSW thresholds. CONCLUSION: The knee joint positioning protocol used demonstrated high day-to-day reliability for SCT 3D tibiofemoral JSW summary measurements repeated 2 weeks apart. Low-dose SCT provides a great deal of information about the joint while maintaining high reliability, making it a suitable alternative to plain radiographs for evaluating JSW in people with knee OA.
Authors: Paul A Yushkevich; Joseph Piven; Heather Cody Hazlett; Rachel Gimpel Smith; Sean Ho; James C Gee; Guido Gerig Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2006-03-20 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: M-P Hellio Le Graverand; E P Vignon; K D Brandt; S A Mazzuca; M Piperno; R Buck; H C Charles; D J Hunter; C G Jackson; V Byers Kraus; T M Link; T J Schnitzer; A Vaz; B Wyman Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2008-02-07 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: P Ravaud; B Giraudeau; G R Auleley; J L Drape; B Rousselin; L Paolozzi; C Chastang; M Dougados Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 1998-10 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: E Vignon; K D Brandt; C Mercier; M Hochberg; D Hunter; S Mazzuca; K Powell; B Wyman; M-P Hellio Le Graverand Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2010-09-08 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Cheryl Barnabe; Helen Buie; Michelle Kan; Eva Szabo; Susan G Barr; Liam Martin; Steven K Boyd Journal: Med Eng Phys Date: 2013-05-14 Impact factor: 2.242
Authors: Neil A Segal; Eric Frick; Jeffrey Duryea; Michael C Nevitt; Jingbo Niu; James C Torner; David T Felson; Donald D Anderson Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2017-04-21 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: N A Segal; E Frick; J Duryea; F Roemer; A Guermazi; M C Nevitt; J C Torner; D T Felson; D D Anderson Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Wouter van der Bruggen; Marlous Hagelstein-Rotman; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Frits Smit; P D Sander Dijkstra; Natasha M Appelman-Dijkstra; Dennis Vriens Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-12-24 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Mayank Dineshkumar Kothari; Kaitlin G Rabe; Donald D Anderson; Michael C Nevitt; John A Lynch; Neil A Segal; Hayden Franz Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2019-12-16 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Jacob F Mortensen; Andreas Kappel; Lasse E Rasmussen; Svend E Østgaard; Anders Odgaard Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2021-09-03 Impact factor: 2.928
Authors: Tom D Turmezei; Samantha B Low; Simon Rupret; Graham M Treece; Andrew H Gee; James W MacKay; John A Lynch; Kenneth Es Poole; Neil A Segal Journal: Osteoarthr Imaging Date: 2022-06-17
Authors: Tom D Turmezei; Samantha B Low; Simon Rupret; Graham M Treece; Andrew H Gee; James W MacKay; John A Lynch; Kenneth E S Poole; Neil A Segal Journal: Radiology Date: 2021-04-13 Impact factor: 29.146
Authors: N A Segal; M T Murphy; B M Everist; K D Brown; J He; J A Lynch; M C Nevitt Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2021-07-29 Impact factor: 6.576