Literature DB >> 10946585

Compensation for subliminal timing perturbations in perceptual-motor synchronization.

B H Repp1.   

Abstract

It is sometimes assumed that limits of temporal discrimination established in psychophysical tasks constrain the timing information available for the control of action. Results from the five perceptual-motor synchronization experiments presented here argue against this assumption. Experiment 1 demonstrates that subliminal (0.8-2%) local changes in interval duration in an otherwise isochronous auditory sequence are rapidly compensated for in the timing of synchronized finger tapping. If this compensation is based on perception of the highly variable synchronization error (SE) rather than of the local change in stimulus period, then it could be based solely on SEs that exceed the temporal order threshold. However, that hypothesis is ruled out by additional analyses of Exp. 1 and the results of Exp. 2, a combined synchronization and temporal order judgment task. Experiments 3-5 further show that three factors that affect the detectability of local deviations from stimulus isochrony do not inhibit effective compensation for such deviations in synchronized tapping. Experiment 5, a combined synchronization and detection task, shows directly that compensation for timing perturbations does not depend on explicit detection. Overall, the results suggest that the automatic processes involved in the temporal control of action have access to more accurate timing information than do the conscious decision processes of auditory temporal judgment.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10946585     DOI: 10.1007/pl00008170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  45 in total

1.  Auditory temporal computation: interval selectivity based on post-inhibitory rebound.

Authors:  Edward W Large; John D Crawford
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Perception-production relationships and phase correction in synchronization with two-interval rhythms.

Authors:  Bruno H Repp; Justin London; Peter E Keller
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-07-20

3.  Does an auditory perceptual illusion affect on-line auditory action control? The case of (de)accentuation and synchronization.

Authors:  Bruno H Repp
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Low frequency rTMS effects on sensorimotor synchronization.

Authors:  Michail Doumas; Peter Praamstra; Alan M Wing
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Multiple temporal references in sensorimotor synchronization with metrical auditory sequences.

Authors:  Bruno H Repp
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-05-25

Review 6.  Sensorimotor synchronization: a review of the tapping literature.

Authors:  Bruno H Repp
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-12

7.  Transfer of learned perception of sensorimotor simultaneity.

Authors:  Michael J Pesavento; John Schlag
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Minding time in an amodal representational space.

Authors:  Virginie van Wassenhove
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Combining multisensory temporal information for movement synchronisation.

Authors:  Alan M Wing; Michail Doumas; Andrew E Welchman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The ability to move to a beat is linked to the consistency of neural responses to sound.

Authors:  Adam Tierney; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.