Literature DB >> 27909006

A Neural Mechanism for Surprise-related Interruptions of Visuospatial Working Memory.

Jan R Wessel1,2.   

Abstract

Surprising perceptual events recruit a fronto-basal ganglia mechanism for inhibition, which suppresses motor activity following surprise. A recent study found that this inhibitory mechanism also disrupts the maintenance of verbal working memory (WM) after surprising tones. However, it is unclear whether this same mechanism also relates to surprise-related interruptions of non-verbal WM. We tested this hypothesis using a change-detection task, in which surprising tones impaired visuospatial WM. Participants also performed a stop-signal task (SST). We used independent component analysis and single-trial scalp-electroencephalogram to test whether the same inhibitory mechanism that reflects motor inhibition in the SST relates to surprise-related visuospatial WM decrements, as was the case for verbal WM. As expected, surprising tones elicited activity of the inhibitory mechanism, and this activity correlated strongly with the trial-by-trial level of surprise. However, unlike for verbal WM, the activity of this mechanism was unrelated to visuospatial WM accuracy. Instead, inhibition-independent activity that immediately succeeded the inhibitory mechanism was increased when visuospatial WM was disrupted. This shows that surprise-related interruptions of visuospatial WM are not effected by the same inhibitory mechanism that interrupts verbal WM, and instead provides evidence for a 2-stage model of distraction.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  change detection; motor inhibition; stop-signal task; surprise; working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 27909006     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhw367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  10 in total

Review 1.  Cortical control and performance monitoring of interrupting and redirecting movements.

Authors:  Pierre Pouget; Aditya Murthy; Veit Stuphorn
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Surprise: Unexpected Action Execution and Unexpected Inhibition Recruit the Same Fronto-Basal-Ganglia Network.

Authors:  Alexandra Sebastian; Anne Maria Konken; Michael Schaum; Klaus Lieb; Oliver Tüscher; Patrick Jung
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Perceptual Surprise Improves Action Stopping by Nonselectively Suppressing Motor Activity via a Neural Mechanism for Motor Inhibition.

Authors:  Isabella C Dutra; Darcy A Waller; Jan R Wessel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  β-Bursts Reveal the Trial-to-Trial Dynamics of Movement Initiation and Cancellation.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Common neural processes during action-stopping and infrequent stimulus detection: The frontocentral P3 as an index of generic motor inhibition.

Authors:  Darcy A Waller; Eliot Hazeltine; Jan R Wessel
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 2.997

6.  Non-selective inhibition of inappropriate motor-tendencies during response-conflict by a fronto-subthalamic mechanism.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel; Darcy A Waller; Jeremy Dw Greenlee
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Frontal cortex tracks surprise separately for different sensory modalities but engages a common inhibitory control mechanism.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel; David E Huber
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Statistical context dictates the relationship between feedback-related EEG signals and learning.

Authors:  Matthew R Nassar; Rasmus Bruckner; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  No explicit memory for individual trial display configurations in a visual search task.

Authors:  Ryan E O'Donnell; Hui Chen; Brad Wyble
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-06-07

10.  Unexpected Sounds Nonselectively Inhibit Active Visual Stimulus Representations.

Authors:  Cheol Soh; Jan R Wessel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 5.357

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.