Literature DB >> 2590327

Accuracy of nonorthogonal magnetic resonance imaging in acute disruption of the anterior cruciate ligament.

A D Vellet1, P Marks, P Fowler, T Munro.   

Abstract

A controlled, prospective study of 30 patients with suspected acute internal derangement of the knee was undertaken to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, and accuracy of nonorthogonal (oblique) sagittal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the assessment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Thirty patients with acute hemarthroses underwent MRI within 12 days of injury, followed by arthroscopy within 24 h of the MRI. A control population of 30 chondromalacia patients underwent similar evaluation. In the acute hemarthrosis patient population, the incidence at arthroscopy of acute complete ACL tears was 60% (18/30); of partial ACL tears, 13.3% (4/30); and of chronic tears, 10% (3/30). A normal ACL was found in 16.6% (5/30) of patients. In the MRI evaluation of patients with suspected ACL injury the following results were obtained for both acute and chronic complete disruption on orthogonal (sagittal) and nonorthogonal (oblique sagittal) imaging, respectively: sensitivity, 61 (16/26) versus 100%; specificity, 70 (21/34) versus 100%; positive predictive value, 61 (16/26) versus 100%; negative predictive value 70 (24/34) versus 100%; and accuracy, 66 (40/60) versus 100%. In the evaluation of partial ACL injury, four partial tears were correctly diagnosed on nonorthogonal MRI, with one false-positive diagnosis. Orthogonal imaging failed to correctly identify any of the partial ACL injuries. Two patients in the control population demonstrated evidence of chronic ACL tears. We believe that we have demonstrated the superiority of T2-weighted nonorthogonal sagittal over conventional orthogonal sagittal ACL MRI in the evaluation of ACL injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2590327     DOI: 10.1016/0749-8063(89)90143-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  7 in total

Review 1.  Research approaches to describe the mechanisms of injuries in sport: limitations and possibilities.

Authors:  T Krosshaug; T E Andersen; O-E O Olsen; G Myklebust; R Bahr
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Case-control study to estimate the performance of dual-energy computed tomography for anterior cruciate ligament tears in patients with history of knee trauma.

Authors:  Katrina N Glazebrook; Lee J Brewerton; Shuai Leng; Rickey E Carter; Peter C Rhee; Naveen S Murthy; B Mathew Howe; Michael D Ringler; Diane L Dahm; Michael J Stuart; Cynthia H McCollough; J G Fletcher
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Relationship between bone bruise volume and the presence of meniscal tears in acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture.

Authors:  Kenneth D Illingworth; Daniel Hensler; Bethany Casagranda; Camilo Borrero; Carola F van Eck; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Diagnostic performance of volume and limited oblique MRI of the anterior cruciate ligament compared to knee arthroscopy.

Authors:  Paula J Richards; Iain McCall; Alexandra Kraus; Mary Jones; Gayle Maffulli; Stephen Bridgman; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2016-09-17

5.  Integrating carthage-specific T1rho MRI into knee clinic diagnostic imaging.

Authors:  Douglas R Pedersen; Noelle F Klocke; Daniel R Thedens; James A Martin; Glenn N Williams; Annunziato Amendola
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2011

6.  MRI of the knee joint with a 3-D gradient echo sequence. Equivalent to diagnostic arthroscopy?

Authors:  K Glückert; B Kladny; A Blank-Schäl; G Hofmann
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Accuracy of clinical diagnosis in knee arthroscopy.

Authors:  Stuart Brooks; Mamdouh Morgan
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.891

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.