Literature DB >> 2763952

MR imaging of the knee in the sagittal projection: comparison of three-dimensional gradient-echo and spin-echo sequences.

J D Reeder1, S O Matz, L Becker, S M Andelman.   

Abstract

Fifty patients with suspected internal derangement of the knee had arthroscopic examinations after MR imaging with both a standard T1-weighted spin-echo (SE) sequence and a three-dimensional (3-D) gradient-echo sequence. This series permitted correlative evaluation of 100 menisci and 50 anterior cruciate ligaments. Meniscal tears were diagnosed when intrameniscal signal communicated with the meniscal surface. Criteria for diagnosing anterior cruciate ligament disruption included absence or discontinuity of the ligament, ligamentous laxity, and hyperflexion of the posterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopic surgery confirmed the presence of 39 meniscal tears and 11 anterior cruciate ligament tears in this population. The sensitivity and specificity of the SE sequence for the diagnosis of meniscal tears were 77% and 98%, respectively. The 3-D gradient-echo sequence had a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 88%. For disruption of the ligament, the SE technique had a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 95% and the 3-D technique had a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 100%. Although these differences in sensitivity and specificity are not statistically significant at the p less than .05 level, probably because of the small sample size, the results show the relative strengths and weaknesses of the two imaging sequences. These data suggest that because of the complementary results of the two MR techniques, both the SE and the 3-D gradient-echo sequences have a role in the diagnosis of knee injuries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2763952     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.153.3.537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  7 in total

1.  The MRI findings of meniscal root tear of the medial meniscus: emphasis on coronal, sagittal and axial images.

Authors:  Sang-Hee Choi; Sooho Bae; Suk Kyeong Ji; Moon Jong Chang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Contribution of thin-slice (1 mm) axial proton density MR images for identification and classification of meniscal tears: correlative study with arthroscopy.

Authors:  G Gökalp; O F Nas; B Demirag; Z Yazici; G Savci
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  MRI in the diagnosis of knee injuries.

Authors:  G Y el-Khoury; T A Manning; D S Tearse
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  1993

4.  Diagnostic performance of volume and limited oblique MRI of the anterior cruciate ligament compared to knee arthroscopy.

Authors:  Paula J Richards; Iain McCall; Alexandra Kraus; Mary Jones; Gayle Maffulli; Stephen Bridgman; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2016-09-17

5.  MRI of the popliteofibular ligament: isotropic 3D WE-DESS versus coronal oblique fat-suppressed T2W MRI.

Authors:  G Rajeswaran; J C Lee; J C Healy
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Qualitative and quantitative assessment of isotropic ankle magnetic resonance imaging: three-dimensional isotropic intermediate-weighted turbo spin echo versus three-dimensional isotropic fast field echo sequences.

Authors:  Hyun Su Kim; Young Cheol Yoon; Jong Won Kwon; Bong-Keun Choe
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  One screening magnetic resonance imaging sequence in evaluation of chondral and meniscal lesions of the knee - a pilot study.

Authors:  Paavo-Ilari Kuikka; Ole M Böstman; Martti J Kiuru; Sari T Salminen; Sakari Mikkola; Harri K Pihlajamäki
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2008-02-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.