Literature DB >> 27899733

Scientific Eminence: Where Are the Women?

Alice H Eagly1, David I Miller2.   

Abstract

Women are sparsely represented among psychologists honored for scientific eminence. However, most currently eminent psychologists started their careers when far fewer women pursued training in psychological science. Now that women earn the majority of psychology Ph.D.'s, will they predominate in the next generation's cadre of eminent psychologists? Comparing currently active female and male psychology professors on publication metrics such as the h index provides clues for answering this question. Men outperform women on the h index and its two components: scientific productivity and citations of contributions. To interpret these gender gaps, we first evaluate whether publication metrics are affected by gender bias in obtaining grant support, publishing papers, or gaining citations of published papers. We also consider whether women's chances of attaining eminence are compromised by two intertwined sets of influences: (a) gender bias stemming from social norms pertaining to gender and to science and (b) the choices that individual psychologists make in pursuing their careers.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  careers; gender bias; publication metrics; scientific eminence

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27899733     DOI: 10.1177/1745691616663918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci        ISSN: 1745-6916


  6 in total

Review 1.  Gender in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Issues, Causes, Solutions.

Authors:  Tessa E S Charlesworth; Mahzarin R Banaji
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The Future of Women in Psychological Science.

Authors:  June Gruber; Jane Mendle; Kristen A Lindquist; Toni Schmader; Lee Anna Clark; Eliza Bliss-Moreau; Modupe Akinola; Lauren Atlas; Deanna M Barch; Lisa Feldman Barrett; Jessica L Borelli; Tiffany N Brannon; Silvia A Bunge; Belinda Campos; Jessica Cantlon; Rona Carter; Adrienne R Carter-Sowell; Serena Chen; Michelle G Craske; Amy J C Cuddy; Alia Crum; Lila Davachi; Angela L Duckworth; Sunny J Dutra; Naomi I Eisenberger; Melissa Ferguson; Brett Q Ford; Barbara L Fredrickson; Sherryl H Goodman; Alison Gopnik; Valerie Purdie Greenaway; Kate L Harkness; Mikki Hebl; Wendy Heller; Jill Hooley; Lily Jampol; Sheri L Johnson; Jutta Joormann; Katherine D Kinzler; Hedy Kober; Ann M Kring; Elizabeth Levy Paluck; Tania Lombrozo; Stella F Lourenco; Kateri McRae; Joan K Monin; Judith T Moskowitz; Misaki N Natsuaki; Gabriele Oettingen; Jennifer H Pfeifer; Nicole Prause; Darby Saxbe; Pamela K Smith; Barbara A Spellman; Virginia Sturm; Bethany A Teachman; Renee J Thompson; Lauren M Weinstock; Lisa A Williams
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2020-09-09

3.  Navigating the leaky pipeline: Do stereotypes about parents predict career outcomes in academia?

Authors:  Vasilena Stefanova; Ioana Latu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Can lifestyle preferences help explain the persistent gender gap in academia? The "mothers work less" hypothesis supported for German but not for U.S. early career researchers.

Authors:  Monika Sieverding; Constanze Eib; Andreas B Neubauer; Thomas Stahl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  "Broad" Impact: Perceptions of Sex/Gender-Related Psychology Journals.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Brown; Jessi L Smith; Doralyn Rossmann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-03

6.  The gender gap in commenting: Women are less likely than men to comment on (men's) published research.

Authors:  Cary Wu; Sylvia Fuller; Zhilei Shi; Rima Wilkes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.