Literature DB >> 36197926

Navigating the leaky pipeline: Do stereotypes about parents predict career outcomes in academia?

Vasilena Stefanova1, Ioana Latu1.   

Abstract

The motherhood penalty seemingly reflects a preference to hire female professionals who are not parents compared to mothers, however, little is known about whether this effect is attributable to parent stereotypes per se. Study 1 assessed the content of the parent-academia stereotypes of 180 individuals working in Education and revealed stronger stereotypical associations of fathers with academia than mothers. Study 2 investigated what parent-academia stereotypes predict in terms of endorsements for hiring men versus women in a mock hiring task set in an academic context. Academics (N = 112) evaluated mock job candidates for an Assistant Professor post while the gender, parental status and leave status of the candidates were manipulated. The findings showed that parents were significantly less likely to be endorsed to be hired than non-parents, regardless of gender. Parent-academia stereotypes led to biased hiring recommendations, such that a greater endorsement of parent-academia stereotypes predicted a reduced likelihood to endorse hiring parents compared to non-parents. Implications for reducing parent stereotypes in academic contexts are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36197926      PMCID: PMC9534419          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275670

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.752


  12 in total

1.  Changes in children's time with parents: United States, 1981-1997.

Authors:  J F Sandberg; S L Hofferth
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2001-08

2.  A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition.

Authors:  Susan T Fiske; Amy J C Cuddy; Peter Glick; Jun Xu
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2002-06

3.  Elite male faculty in the life sciences employ fewer women.

Authors:  Jason M Sheltzer; Joan C Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Scientific Eminence: Where Are the Women?

Authors:  Alice H Eagly; David I Miller
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-11

Review 5.  Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes.

Authors:  A G Greenwald; M R Banaji
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Gender bias in leader evaluations: merging implicit theories and role congruity perspectives.

Authors:  Crystal L Hoyt; Jeni L Burnette
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2013-07-08

7.  Motherhood: a potential source of bias in employment decisions.

Authors:  Madeline E Heilman; Tyler G Okimoto
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2008-01

8.  Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students.

Authors:  Corinne A Moss-Racusin; John F Dovidio; Victoria L Brescoll; Mark J Graham; Jo Handelsman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.

Authors:  Alice H Eagly; Steven J Karau
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Reducing Implicit Gender Leadership Bias in Academic Medicine With an Educational Intervention.

Authors:  Sabine Girod; Magali Fassiotto; Daisy Grewal; Manwai Candy Ku; Natarajan Sriram; Brian A Nosek; Hannah Valantine
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 6.893

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.