Literature DB >> 27898838

Assessment of Cultivar Distinctness in Alfalfa: A Comparison of Genotyping-by-Sequencing, Simple-Sequence Repeat Marker, and Morphophysiological Observations.

Paolo Annicchiarico, Nelson Nazzicari, Acharya Ananta, Maria Carelli, Yanling Wei, E Charles Brummer.   

Abstract

Cultivar registration agencies typically require morphophysiological trait-based distinctness of candidate cultivars. This requirement is difficult to achieve for cultivars of major perennial forages because of their genetic structure and ever-increasing number of registered material, leading to possible rejection of agronomically valuable cultivars. This study aimed to explore the value of molecular markers applied to replicated bulked plants (three bulks of 100 independent plants each per cultivar) to assess alfalfa ( L. subsp. ) cultivar distinctness. We compared genotyping-by-sequencing information based on 2902 polymorphic single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers (>30 reads per DNA sample) with morphophysiological information based on 11 traits and with simple-sequence repeat (SSR) marker information from 41 polymorphic markers for their ability to distinguish 11 alfalfa landraces representative of the germplasm from northern Italy. Three molecular criteria, one based on cultivar differences for individual SSR bands and two based on overall SNP marker variation assessed either by statistically significant cultivar differences on principal component axes or discriminant analysis, distinctly outperformed the morphophysiological criterion. Combining the morphophysiological criterion with either molecular marker method increased discrimination among cultivars, since morphophysiological diversity was unrelated to SSR marker-based diversity ( = 0.04) and poorly related to SNP marker-based diversity ( = 0.23, < 0.15). The criterion based on statistically significant SNP allele frequency differences was less discriminating than morphophysiological variation. Marker-based distinctness, which can be assessed at low cost and without interactions with testing conditions, could validly substitute for (or complement) morphophysiological distinctness in alfalfa cultivar registration schemes. It also has interest in sui generis registration systems aimed at marketing alfalfa landraces.
Copyright © 2016 Crop Science Society of America.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27898838     DOI: 10.3835/plantgenome2015.10.0105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Genome        ISSN: 1940-3372            Impact factor:   4.089


  8 in total

1.  The Impact of Genotyping-by-Sequencing Pipelines on SNP Discovery and Identification of Markers Associated with Verticillium Wilt Resistance in Autotetraploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.).

Authors:  Long-Xi Yu; Ping Zheng; Suresh Bhamidimarri; Xiang-Ping Liu; Dorie Main
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 2.  Insights into deployment of DNA markers in plant variety protection and registration.

Authors:  Seyed Hossein Jamali; James Cockram; Lee T Hickey
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  RAD-seq as an effective strategy for heterogenous variety identification in plants-a case study in Italian Ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum).

Authors:  Qingqing Yu; Yao Ling; Yanli Xiong; Wenda Zhao; Yi Xiong; Zhixiao Dong; Jian Yang; Junming Zhao; Xinquan Zhang; Xiao Ma
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 5.260

4.  Diversity analysis of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) germplasm using the CottonSNP63K Array.

Authors:  Lori L Hinze; Amanda M Hulse-Kemp; Iain W Wilson; Qian-Hao Zhu; Danny J Llewellyn; Jen M Taylor; Andrew Spriggs; David D Fang; Mauricio Ulloa; John J Burke; Marc Giband; Jean-Marc Lacape; Allen Van Deynze; Joshua A Udall; Jodi A Scheffler; Steve Hague; Jonathan F Wendel; Alan E Pepper; James Frelichowski; Cindy T Lawley; Don C Jones; Richard G Percy; David M Stelly
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.215

5.  LinkImputeR: user-guided genotype calling and imputation for non-model organisms.

Authors:  Daniel Money; Zoë Migicovsky; Kyle Gardner; Sean Myles
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Large-scale SNP discovery and construction of a high-density genetic map of Colossoma macropomum through genotyping-by-sequencing.

Authors:  José de Ribamar da Silva Nunes; Shikai Liu; Fábio Pértille; Caio Augusto Perazza; Priscilla Marqui Schmidt Villela; Vera Maria Fonseca de Almeida-Val; Alexandre Wagner Silva Hilsdorf; Zhanjiang Liu; Luiz Lehmann Coutinho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Plant Variety Protection: Current Practices and Insights.

Authors:  Ju-Kyung Yu; Yong-Suk Chung
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-25       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  Molecular-Assisted Distinctness and Uniformity Testing Using SLAF-Sequencing Approach in Soybean.

Authors:  Shengrui Zhang; Bin Li; Ying Chen; Abdulwahab S Shaibu; Hongkun Zheng; Junming Sun
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 4.096

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.