Literature DB >> 31049631

Insights into deployment of DNA markers in plant variety protection and registration.

Seyed Hossein Jamali1, James Cockram2, Lee T Hickey3.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: The efficiency of phenotype-based assessments of plant variety protection and registration could be improved by the integration of DNA-based testing. We review the current and proposed models in the era of next-generation breeding. The current plant variety protection system relies on morphological description of plant varieties. Distinctness, uniformity, and stability (DUS) assessments determine whether a new variety is distinguishable from common knowledge varieties and exhibits sufficient phenotypic uniformity and stability during two independent growing cycles. However, DUS assessment can be costly, time-consuming and often restricted to a relatively small number of traits that can be influenced by environmental conditions. This calls for the adoption of a DNA-based system which is endorsed by the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV). This could enable examiners to deploy trait-specific DNA markers in DUS testing as well as using such genetic markers to manage reference collections. Within UPOV's system, breeders can freely use protected varieties in breeding programs. However, breeders of protected varieties may seek sharing in ownership of essentially derived varieties once it is proven that they, with the exception of a few distinctive DUS trait(s), conform to parental varieties in essential characteristics. As well as their complementary role in DUS testing, DNA markers have been known as a good replacement of morphological traits in defining boundaries between independently and essentially derived varieties. With the advent of new breeding technologies that allow minor modification in varieties with outcomes of specific merit or utility, detecting distinctness between varieties may become increasingly challenging. This, together with the ever-increasing number of varieties with which to compare new candidate varieties, supports the potential utility of using DNA-based approaches in variety description.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31049631     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-019-03348-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  41 in total

1.  Construction and analysis of a microsatellite-based database of European wheat varieties.

Authors:  M S Röder; K Wendehake; V Korzun; G Bredemeijer; D Laborie; L Bertrand; P Isaac; S Rendell; J Jackson; R J Cooke; B Vosman; M W Ganal
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2002-08-30       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Construction and testing of a microsatellite database containing more than 500 tomato varieties.

Authors:  M. Bredemeijer; J. Cooke; W. Ganal; R. Peeters; P. Isaac; Y. Noordijk; S. Rendell; J. Jackson; S. Röder; K. Wendehake; M. Dijcks; M. Amelaine; V. Wickaert; L. Bertrand; B. Vosman
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2002-09-07       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  The establishment of 'essential derivation' among rose varieties, using AFLP.

Authors:  Ben Vosman; Dirk Visser; Jeroen Rouppe van der Voort; Marinus J M Smulders; Fred van Eeuwijk
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Identification of essentially derived varieties with molecular markers: an approach based on statistical test theory and computer simulations.

Authors:  M Heckenberger; M Bohn; M Frisch; H P Maurer; A E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2005-05-26       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Use of SSR markers to complement tests of distinctiveness, uniformity, and stability (DUS) of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) varieties.

Authors:  Yong-Sham Kwon; Je-Min Lee; Gi-Bum Yi; Seung-In Yi; Kyung-Min Kim; Eun-Hee Soh; Kyung-Mi Bae; Eun-Kyung Park; In-Ho Song; Byung-Dong Kim
Journal:  Mol Cells       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 5.034

6.  Relationships among durum wheat accessions. II. A comparison of molecular and pedigree information.

Authors:  M Maccaferri; M C Sanguineti; C Xie; J S C Smith; R Tuberosa
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.166

7.  The development of multiplex simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers to complement distinctness, uniformity and stability testing of rape (Brassica napus L.) varieties.

Authors:  L Tommasini; J Batley; G M Arnold; R J Cooke; P Donini; D Lee; J R Law; C Lowe; C Moule; M Trick; K J Edwards
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2002-10-22       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  The Vrn-H2 locus is a major determinant of flowering time in a facultative x winter growth habit barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) mapping population.

Authors:  I Karsai; P Szucs; K Mészáros; T Filichkina; P M Hayes; J S Skinner; L Láng; Z Bedo
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2005-04-16       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Identification of SNPs in the waxy gene among glutinous rice cultivars and their evolutionary significance during the domestication process of rice.

Authors:  Shinsuke Yamanaka; Ikuo Nakamura; Kazuo N Watanabe; Yo-Ichiro Sato
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Relationships among durum wheat accessions. I. Comparative analysis of SSR, AFLP, and phenotypic data.

Authors:  M Maccaferri; S Stefanelli; F Rotondo; R Tuberosa; M C Sanguineti
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.166

View more
  15 in total

1.  Genome-wide core sets of SNP markers and Fluidigm assays for rapid and effective genotypic identification of Korean cultivars of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.).

Authors:  Jee-Soo Park; Min-Young Kang; Eun-Jo Shim; JongHee Oh; Kyoung-In Seo; Kyung Seok Kim; Sung-Chur Sim; Sang-Min Chung; Younghoon Park; Gung Pyo Lee; Won-Sik Lee; Minkyung Kim; Jin-Kee Jung
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 7.291

2.  Potato Cultivar Identification in South Africa Using a Custom SNP Panel.

Authors:  Inge Gazendam; Pinkie Mojapelo; Michael W Bairu
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-10

3.  Genome-wide SNP discovery and core marker sets for assessment of genetic variations in cultivated pumpkin (Cucurbita spp.).

Authors:  Nam Ngoc Nguyen; Minkyung Kim; Jin-Kee Jung; Eun-Jo Shim; Sang-Min Chung; Younghoon Park; Gung Pyo Lee; Sung-Chur Sim
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 6.793

4.  Genetic relationship and nuclear dna content variation in Tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter] accessions.

Authors:  Caglar Kaya; Iskender Tiryaki; Ugur Sari; Metin Tuna
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 5.  Functional Markers for Precision Plant Breeding.

Authors:  Romesh K Salgotra; C Neal Stewart
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms as Practical Molecular Tools to Support European Chestnut Agrobiodiversity Management.

Authors:  Angelina Nunziata; Valentino Ruggieri; Milena Petriccione; Luigi De Masi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Overcoming barriers to the registration of new plant varieties under the DUS system.

Authors:  Chin Jian Yang; Joanne Russell; Luke Ramsay; William Thomas; Wayne Powell; Ian Mackay
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-03-08

8.  Digital PCR for Genotype Quantification: A Case Study in a Pasta Production Chain.

Authors:  Caterina Morcia; Valeria Terzi; Roberta Ghizzoni; Chiara Vaiuso; Chiara Delogu; Lorella Andreani; Andrea Venturini; Paola Carnevali; Pier Paolo Pompa; Giorgio Tumino
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-09

9.  Molecular-Assisted Distinctness and Uniformity Testing Using SLAF-Sequencing Approach in Soybean.

Authors:  Shengrui Zhang; Bin Li; Ying Chen; Abdulwahab S Shaibu; Hongkun Zheng; Junming Sun
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 4.096

10.  Genetic diversity and fingerprinting of 33 standard flue-cured tobacco varieties for use in distinctness, uniformity, and stability testing.

Authors:  Binbin He; Ruimei Geng; Lirui Cheng; Xianbin Yang; Hongmei Ge; Min Ren
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 4.215

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.