Literature DB >> 27898708

Influence of TP53 Codon 72 Polymorphism Alone or in Combination with HDM2 SNP309 on Human Infertility and IVF Outcome.

Ying Chan1, Baosheng Zhu1, Hongguo Jiang2, Jinman Zhang1, Ying Luo2, Wenru Tang2.   

Abstract

To evaluate the association of the TP53 codon 72 (rs 1042522) alone or in combination with HDM2 SNP309 (rs 2279744) polymorphisms with human infertility and IVF outcome, we collected 1450 infertility women undergoing their first controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF treatment and 250 fertile controls in the case-control study. Frequencies, distribution, interaction of genes, and correlation with infertility and IVF outcome of clinical pregnancy were analyzed. We found a statistically significant association between TP53 codon 72 polymorphism and IVF outcome (52.10% vs. 47.40%, OR = 0.83, 95%CI:0.71-0.96, p = 0.01). No significant difference was shown between TP53 codon 72, HDM2 SNP309 polymorphisms, human infertility, and between the combination of two genes polymorphisms and the clinical pregnancy outcome of IVF. The data support C allele as a protective factor for IVF pregnancy outcome. Further researches should be focused on the mechanism of these associations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27898708      PMCID: PMC5127557          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Infertility is a global health problem with an estimated incidence of 10–15% of general reproductive age couples. The increasing couples of infertility are seeking for IVF-ET (in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer) treatment to be pregnant, but the main factors that determine the final outcome of treatment are still mostly undefined[1]. The most direct parameters associated with successful pregnancy contain maternal age, embryo quality and the endometrial receptivity. In addition, other causes leading to negative IVF outcome remain unknown. The trophoblastic invasion of blastocyst and establishment of angiogenesis involve in the procedure of embryo implantation, and these processes depend on the balance of growth and apoptosis [2]. Tumor suppressor gene P53 (TP53) was identified to be a potential inducer of apoptosis and angiogenesis [3, 4]. Recently, with the accumulation of human genomic knowledge and the development of DNA technology efficiency, genetic factors related to implantation failure can be explored generally, especially some single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) identified in human[5]. TP53 is the most common mutated gene in human cancer researches and more than 50% of tumors exists mutations in this gene [6]. Tumor suppressor protein p53 is a transcription factor that can stop cell progression or promote apoptosis when cell suffers from stress signals[7]. The well-known functions of TP53 include tumor suppression, DNA damage repair, metabolic pathways, regulation of oxidative stress, invasion and motility, cellular senescence, angiogenesis, differentiation, bone remodeling and reproduction regulation. Recent studies suggested that TP53 participates in human reproduction mainly through regulating leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) levels[8]. Otherwise, apoptosis and angiogenesis have played a crucial role during the normal pregnancy development [9]. TP53 codon 72 polymorphism (rs 1042522) is a vital functional polymorphic form which consists of either a wild C allele or a derived G allele. The C allele and G allele lead to a proline and an arginine in codon 72 location respectively. G allele shows a higher efficiency than C allele in view of inducing apoptosis, expression of leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) and suppression of cell transformation [10]. Some studies revealed that TP53 codon 72 polymorphism is associated with human fertility, the higher frequency of C/C genotype distribution was found in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) than the other groups [11, 12], but it lacks a significant effect on implantation rate [13]. Kang et al. found TP53 codon 72 C allele is enriched in IVF patients with unexplained infertility [14], but the enrichment was not found by Patounakis et al.[15]. Human double minute 2 (HDM2; human ortholog of murine double minute 2) is a main negative regulator of p53[16]. TP53 and HDM2 form an autoregulatory negative feedback loop within which HDM2 negatively regulates TP53 levels and activity and TP53 positively regulates HDM2 levels[17]. An important polymorphism in the HDM2 gene at the 309th nucleotide was identified and results from a T to G change. The HDM2 SNP309 G/G (rs 2279744) polymorphism with raised promoter recognition by Sp1 transcription factor elevates HDM2 expression and attenuation of apoptosis mediated by TP53 [18]. It was reported that HDM2 SNP 309 polymorphism alone or in combination with TP53 codon 72 polymorphism may be related to missed abortion [19, 20]. Determining the roles of TP53 codon 72 and HDM2 SNP309 polymorphisms in human infertility and IVF pregnancy outcome is very important for the previous contradictory reports. The aim of the presented study was to define the possible impact of TP53 codon 72 polymorphism and/or HDM2 SNP 309 on human fertility and the first IVF pregnancy outcomes.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

All participants were recruited from The First People’s Hospital of Yunnan Province. Blood samples were collected from July 2010 to December 2012. Informed consents were signed by all participants before the procedure and all of them agreed to provide their samples for molecular study. The study was approved by The Ethics Review Board of The First People’s Hospital of Yunnan Province. The study was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines. The sample size was evaluated for the genotyped SNPs with the use of a relevant genotype frequency of 45% in Asians, aiming at reaching 80% power to test an OR value of 1.5 for the case group. The research was ceased once it reached the statistical significance. The identifying information of patient was not included in the data analysis to protect patient privacy and anonymity. Totally, 1450 IVF patients and 250 normal fertile control women were included in the study. Among the 1450 women undergoing the first IVF treatment, one case was excluded from analysis of polymorphisms and IVF outcome for the loss of follow-up. All subjects (age<40 years) enrolled in the study were normal according to their physical examination results and ruled out abnormal chromosome karyotype. The control group consists of 250 women without infertility history, who had delivered at least one child without any difficulties. The infertility group consists of 1450 patients undergoing their first IVF cycle, the exclusion criteria are as follows: 1) non-male factor infertility, 2) without normal pregnancy history, 3) cycles with Controlled Ovary Hyperstimulation (COH) and qualified embryo transfer. Tubal factor, mild endometriosis, ovulation failure, cervical factor, polycystic ovary syndrome and unexplained infertility constitute the pathogenesis of IVF patients in the study. All patients undergoing IVF treatment were submitted to conventional COH using recombinant human FSH and pituitary suppression with GnRh antagonist. Ovulation was injected by 10000 recombinant hCG when at least three leading follicles had reached more than 17 mm, 36 hours later; follicle aspiration was performed under transvaginal ultrasound guidance. According to the standard IVF procedure, treatment of gametes, fertilization, embryo culture, embryo freezing and embryo transfer (day 3) were conducted. The good quality embryo was defined as 6–8 cells with less than 20% fragments. Ultrasound scans examination was performed at 7–8 weeks gestation to determine the clinical pregnancy outcome. The hormonal measurement results were analyzed using medical records of patients tested at day 2–3 of menstrual cycle.

Genotyping

Genomic DNA sample was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes by the method of phenol-chloroform extraction. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) was used to determine the genotypes of TP53 codon 72 polymorphism and HDM2 SNP 309 polymorphism. All DNA samples were stored at -20°C before analysis. A random 10% of samples were repeated to verify the genotyping results. All the procedures were performed in the Laboratory of Molecular Genetics of Aging & Tumor, Faculty of Medicine, Kunming University of Science and Technology. The genotypes were assigned using all of the data from the study. For the TP53 codon 72 polymorphism, the forward primer sequence 5’-AGC AGA GAC CTG TGG GAA GCG A and reverse primer 5’-CAG GGC AAC TGA CCG TGC AAG T were used to generate a 473bp fragment. The general PCR conditions were: initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 minutes, 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 seconds, annealing at 60°C for 30 seconds, polymerization at 72°C for 30 seconds, and the final extension at 72°C for 5 minutes. The products were digested by the restriction enzyme BstUI (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA, USA) at 60°C for 20 hours. The fragment with G allele was cut into 309bp and 164 bp, but the fragment with C allele was undigested (473bp). The digested solution was loaded into 2% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide for electrophoresis. For the HDM2 SNP 309, The forward primer sequence 5’-CGC GGG AGT TCA GGG TAA AG and reverse primer 5’- AGC TGG AGA CAA GTC AGG ACT TAA C were used to amplify a 236bp fragment. The amplified products were digested overnight by the restriction enzyme MspA1I (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA, USA). The fragment with GG allele was cut into 186bp and 50 bp, but the fragment with TT allele was undigested (236bp). The digested solution was loaded into 3% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide for electrophoresis to identify genotype.

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was conducted using SPSS 15.0 software, The Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used to calculate the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in healthy controls to exclude the possible bias during the selection of controls, as well as to compare the genotype and allele frequencies between the case and control groups. We used the Student’s t-test and Chi-square test to analyze the demographic and clinical characteristics of the case and control samples. All the values were presented as means. The adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were also used by a multiple logistic regression. In the two-tailed test, a probability level of <0.05 was defined as a statistically significant result. For multiple comparisons among the combination of two genes’s polymorphisms, totally 9 subgroups were formed, p<0.0056(0.05/9) was defined as a statistically significant result based on the principle of Bonferroni correction. To avoid the assumptions of genetic models, dominant, recessive and allele models for TP53 codon 72 polymorphism were also evaluated. And the Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was conducted to determine differences between groups for quantitative variables.

Results

A total of 1450 cases and 250 controls were included in the study and all genotypes of participants were detected successful. The mean ages of cases and controls were 31.82±4.40 and 30.24±5.61 at recruitment respectively. Case and control groups are all meet the Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) considering the distribution of TP53 codon 72 and HDM2 SNP309 polymorphic genotypes (p = 0.29, p = 0.16). The IVF outcome of different genotypes was adjusted by age and embryo number of ET.

TP53 codon 72 polymorphism and HDM2 SNP 309 polymorphism with risk of infertility

The frequencies of TP53 codon 72 polymorphism and HDM2 SNP309 polymorphism were presented in Tables 1 and 2. The results showed that no significant difference was found in different genetic models between infertility and control groups in view of TP53 codon 72 polymorphism and HDM2 SNP309 polymorphism.
Table 1

Association of TP53 codon72 polymorphism and female infertility.

Cases(n = 1450)Controls(n = 250)OR(95%CI)pa
n%n%
Codominant
 G/G36224.976526.001
 C/G74751.5213353.200.99(0.73–1.39)0.96
 C/C34123.525220.801.18(0.77–1.65)0.42
Recessive
 G/G +C/G110976.4819879.201
 C/C34123.525220.801.18(0.75–1.53)0.35
Dominant
 G/G36224.976526.001
 C/C+C/G108875.0318574.001.06(0.78–1.55)0.73
Allele
 G147150.7226352.601
 C142949.2823747.401.08(0.79–1.31)0.44

p: adjusted p value for age

Table 2

Association of HDM2 SNP309 polymorphism and female infertility.

HDM2Cases(n = 1450)Controls(n = 250)OR(95%CI)pa
n%n%
Codominant
 G/G35524.486526.001
 T/G77853.6613955.600.98(0.74–1.41)0.62
 T/T31721.864618.400.79(0.54–1.60)0.37
Dominant
 G/G+T/G113378.1420481.601
 T/T31721.864618.401.23 (0.68–1.55)0.46
Recessive
 G/G35524.486526.001
 T/T+T/G109575.5218574.001.08(0.82–1.52)0.55
Allele
 G148951.3426953.801
 T141148.6623146.201.06 (0.81–1.34)0.39

p: adjusted p value for age

p: adjusted p value for age p: adjusted p value for age

TP53 codon 72 polymorphism and HDM2 SNP 309 polymorphism with IVF outcome

A total of 1449 women undergoing their first IVF treatment cycles were enrolled in the analysis. Of the 1449 patients, 569 were positive and 880 were negative clinical pregnancy outcome. We analyzed the demographic characteristics and clinical profiles related to pregnancy such as patient mean age, body mass index, duration of infertility, basal FSH levels, basal LH levels, thickness of endometrium, number of oocytes retrieved, number of fertilized oocytes, number of cleavage embryos, number of transferred embryos and number of good quality embryos among different genotypes of TP53 codon 72 polymorphism and HDM2 SNP309 polymorphism (shown in Tables 3 and 4), and no significant difference was found.
Table 3

Basal information of patient with different TP53 codon72 SNP.

C/CC/GG/Gp
Age(years)31.67±4.1731.94±4.4131.70±4.600.55
Body Mass Index21.69±3.3421.90±4.8722.18±5.990.42
Duration of infertility(years)4.78±3.434.97±3.415.04±3.520.57
FSH(IU/L)6.02±3.586.30±3.306.33±3.530.77
Thickness of endometrium (day of hCG)9.05±4.638.95±5.138.78±4.830.32
LH(IU/L)5.77±3.107.21±3.336.09±3.860.60
Number of oocytes retrieved8.87±6.468.90±6.499.04±6.540.93
Number of fertilized oocytes6.18±4.216.26±4.456.14±4.280.91
Number of cleavage embryos6.03±4.156.15±4.396.03±4.240.86
Number of transferred embryos2.12±0.542.16±0.552.13±0.560.57
Number of good quality embryos3.37±2.853.44±2.993.17±2.930.38
Table 4

Basic information of female patients with different HDM2 SNP309.

T/TT/GG/Gp
Age(years)32.08±4.6632.12±4.7232.50±4.650.33
Body Mass Index22.20±4.8922.20±5.4921.78±4.260.36
Duration of infertility(years)5.00±3.284.86±3.485.20±3.750.27
FSH(IU/L)6.17±4.606.15±6.946.30±5.390.91
Thickness of endometrium (day of hCG)6.07±6.655.93±7.497.67±4.230.41
LH(IU/L)8.99±5.088.62±5.038.90±5.040.43
Number of oocytes retrieved8.56±6.249.17±6.598.45±6.080.11
Number of fertilized oocytes5.88±4.066.39±4.425.90±4.190.07
Number of cleavage embryos2.16±0.592.17±0.552.15±0.580.84
Number of transferred embryos3.15±2.753.35±2.873.41±3.150.43
The distributions of TP53 codon 72 polymorphism between negative and positive groups were shown in Table 5. The C allele showed a higher frequency in positive clinical pregnancy group than the negative group (52.10% vs. 47.40%, p = 0.01). A strong significant association was found between C allele and IVF outcome (OR = 0.83, 95%CI:0.71–0.96, p = 0.01) with adjusted p value by age and embryo’s number of ET for their vital impact roles in embryo implantation, which suggested that C allele decreased the risk of pregnancy failure after IVF.
Table 5

Frequencies of female TP53 codon72 polymorphism among women with different IVF outcome.

CodominantIVF outcomeOR(95%CI)pa
negativepositive
n%n%
 G/G23426.5912822.501
 C/G45852.0528950.790.86(0.67–1.10)0.52
 C/C18821.3615226.710.65(0.49–0.87)0.02
Recessive
 G/G+C/G69278.6441773.291
 C/C18821.3615226.710.72(0.57–0.91)0.02
Dominant
 G/G23426.5912822.501
 C/C+C/G64673.4144177.500.79(0.63–0.99)0.17
Allele
 G92652.6154547.891
 C83447.3959352.110.83(0.71–0.96)0.01

p: adjusted p value for age and embryo number of ET

No significant difference was found among both groups for HDM2 SNP309 polymorphic genotypes (shown in Table 6). It means that HDM2 SNP309 polymorphism is not associated with pregnancy outcome of IVF.

p: adjusted p value for age and embryo number of ET No significant difference was found among both groups for HDM2 SNP309 polymorphic genotypes (shown in Table 6). It means that HDM2 SNP309 polymorphism is not associated with pregnancy outcome of IVF.
Table 6

Association of female HDM2 SNP309 and IVF outcome.

CodominantIVF outcomeOR(95%CI)pa
negativepositive
n%n%
 G/G2230.25341310.23021
 T/G4670.53073110.54660.88(0.64–1.20)0.29
 T/T1900.21591270.22320.99(0.76–1.30)0.76
Recessive
 G/G+T/G6900.78414420.77681
 T/T1900.21591270.22320.80(0.58–1.33)0.53
Dominant
 T/T+T/G6570.74664380.76981
 G/G2230.25341310.23020.88(0.69–1.13)0.26
Allele
 G9140.51935730.50351
 T8460.48075650.49650.93(0.82–1.14)0.3

p: adjusted p value for age and embryo number of ET

p: adjusted p value for age and embryo number of ET

The combination of TP53 codon 72 polymorphism and HDM2 SNP 309 polymorphism with IVF outcome

The effect of combination between TP53 codon 72 polymorphism and HDM2 SNP 309 polymorphism on IVF outcome are listed in Table 7. We carried out a Bonferroni correction for multiple statistical tests, p<0.0056 was defined as a statistically significant difference. Of 9 combined forms, no significant differences were found in clinical pregnancy rate among different combination forms compared to all the other remained forms.
Table 7

Conjoint analysis between pregnancy outcome and female polymorphism of TP53 codon72 and HDM2 SNP309.

TP53codon72SNPHDM2 SNP309numbersPregnancy rateOR(95%CI)Mean agespa
C/CT/T7544.00%0.84(0.48–1.47)31.92±3.870.57
C/CT/G17544.57%0.94(0.65–1.35)31.70±4.410.82
C/CG/G9045.56%0.65(0.38–1.12)31.42±3.940.16
C/GT/T15540.00%0.96(0.65–1.39)31.50±4.420.93
C/GT/G41438.89%1.03(0.80–1.34)32.01±4.420.87
C/GG/G17837.08%1.12(0.79–1.59)32.17±4.370.58
G/GT/T8637.21%1.07(0.65–1.783)31.58±4.780.91
G/GT/G19037.89%1.39(0.96–2.02)31.16±4.230.21
G/GG/G8627.91%2.32(1.49–3.62)33.02±4.970.04
Total144939.27%31.82±4.40

p: adjusted p value for age and embryo number of ET and p<0.0056(0.05/9) was defined as a statistically significant difference

p: adjusted p value for age and embryo number of ET and p<0.0056(0.05/9) was defined as a statistically significant difference

Discussion

The study explored polymorphisms of TP53 codon 72 and HDM2 SNP309 to obtain new insight about their association with human infertility and IVF outcome. Significant differences were revealed between allelic frequencies of TP53 codon 72 polymorphism and IVF outcome in women undergoing their first IVF cycles in the study. The distribution frequency of TP53 codon 72 C allele was higher in positive pregnancy patients after their first IVF cycle than negative pregnancy patients. The statistically significant differences were not found between infertility patients and controls for the distributions of two vital functional polymorphisms in apoptosis pathway genes Similarly, no significant difference was found between positive and negative pregnancy women undergoing IVF treatment for HDM2 SNP309 polymorphism and the combination with TP53 codon 72 polymorphism. The result of our study was inconsistent with previous reports. It was demonstrated that C allele of TP53 codon 72 and G allele of HDM2 SNP309 polymorphism were enriched in IVF patients and C allele served as a risk factor of embryo implantation [14]. No significant difference was found in clinical pregnancy rate of IVF cycles with TP53 codon 72 polymorphism reported in another study by Patounakis et al [13]. Moreover, Lledo et al. revealed that TP53 gene codon 72 polymorphism in RIF and RPL patients is more prevalent than fertile controls; patients carrying a C homozygote genotype on TP53 codon 72 will have less chance to achieve an ongoing pregnancy after IVF[21]. These disagreements may result from the different selection of patients. In order to determine whether two functional SNPs of TP 53 and HDM2 have an influence on human female fertility and pregnancy rate after IVF and whether the SNPs is more prevalent in infertile population, our study selected the general infertility population in IVF center and fertile women as control. Therefore we did not assess other possible relationship between the polymorphisms and infertility factors. The study of Kang et al. just enrolled the unexplained infertility IVF patients may limit the association of the special population with TP53 codon 72 and HDM2 SNP309 polymorphisms; moreover, the reduction of pregnancy rate after IVF for C allele was confined to this unexplained infertility group[14]. This may be hard to elucidate the real effect of TP53 and HDM2 important polymorphisms on human reproduction. Another possible explanation about different results is the genetic heterogeneity. It was published that different distributions for the polymorphisms of TP53 codon 72 and HDM2 SNP309 in different regional or ethnic populations [22, 23]. The functional polymorphisms of TP53 and HDM2 may derive from selective pressure from different environmental exposures [24]. Moreover, TP53 functional polymorphism or other polymorphism might play a subtle role in human fecundity, which can be reflected only in larger sample size studies. But Patounakis et al. reported that no enrichment of C allele of TP53 codon 72 was found in IVF patients with agreement with our results [15]. Patounakis et al. selected all patients without exclusion criteria, for male infertility, most female partners are fertile, which may become the confounding factor to the result. With respect to TP53 codon 72 polymorphism, most of studies about human reproduction focused on RIF and/or RPL women to draw some conflict conclusions[11, 12, 15, 21, 25]. Excepting for the selection of studied subjects, ethnic and regional discrepancies may contribute to these inconsistent results. Successful pregnancy mainly depends on some intricate events which remain ambiguity such as appropriate proliferation, invasion into endometium and angiogenesis. Even though, some signals regulating embryo development and uterine receptivity are generated necessarily to support these processes. TP53 gene affects these events and TP53 codon 72 polymorphism may alter these processes resulting in implantation failure or very early pregnancy loss [11]. It is well known that C72 has been shown to induce apoptosis lower than G72 and C72 is associated with enhanced proliferation and implantation potential. These functions of C72 perhaps were performed during the early stage of pregnancy or around the time of implantation[12], which may explain our results that C allele raises the pregnancy rate of IVF. In addition, G allele has been found to induce apoptosis more than C72 [10], it may initiate the apoptosis procedure around the peri-implantation period responding to some exogenous environmental stresses for IVF treatment partly involves in several anthropogenic programs such as controlled ovary hyperstimulation, oocyte aspiration, in vitro fertilization-embryo culture and embryo transfer et al. Thus, G allele might decrease the IVF outcome to some extent. That can be accounted for the gene-environment interaction resulting in different susceptibility to different environmental factor even with the same polymorphic genotype. TP53 regulates maternal reproduction at implantation stage through controlling its target gene leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), LIF is a crucial cellular factor during blastocyst implantation. TP53 regulates a transiently increased expression of LIF in uterus which is accordant to the onset of implantation [8]. In view of LIF and embryo implantation, the result of our study disagrees with that mechanism. A plausible explanation is that TP53 performs its apoptosis role responding to some cell exposures surrounding early stage of implantation before the recognition of conception in spite of occurrence of implantation. Human reproduction was regulated by many genes and gene network and affected by different influence factors, how these genes interact with these factors to participate in and complete the procedure remains unknown. Many further studies need to be done to illustrate the procedure. In summary, the results supported the association TP53 codon 72 polymorphism with IVF outcome. In other words, which means the carriers of C allele should have higher chance to be pregnant than the others. The limitation of the study was the lack of mechanic explanation, the subgroup analysis based on the infertility causes, lack the information of the subsequent IVF outcome for negative patients after their first ET cycles, lack the embryo related genotypes analysis and fewer SNPs of genes analyzed in TP53 pathway. Other mutations of TP53 pathway need to be searched, as it has been shown to be essential in apoptosis and angiogenesis during the normal pregnancy development. Detailed further studies with a larger sample size need to be performed to confirm our results. Meantime, it is also important that related mechanical studies in vivo should be carried out to testify the biological processes and associations.

This is the STROBE Checklist.

(DOC) Click here for additional data file.
  24 in total

1.  Winter temperature and UV are tightly linked to genetic changes in the p53 tumor suppressor pathway in Eastern Asia.

Authors:  Hong Shi; Si-jie Tan; Hua Zhong; Wenwei Hu; Arnold Levine; Chun-jie Xiao; Yi Peng; Xue-bin Qi; Wei-hua Shou; Run-lin Z Ma; Yi Li; Bing Su; Xin Lu
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  Angiogenin and apoptosis in hypertension in pregnancy.

Authors:  Vellore J Karthikeyan; Gregory Y H Lip; Deirdre A Lane; Andrew D Blann
Journal:  Pregnancy Hypertens       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 2.899

3.  The p53 tumor suppressor gene inhibits angiogenesis by stimulating the production of thrombospondin.

Authors:  K M Dameron; O V Volpert; M A Tainsky; N Bouck
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1994

Review 4.  Molecular epidemiology of human cancer risk: gene-environment interactions and p53 mutation spectrum in human lung cancer.

Authors:  W P Bennett; S P Hussain; K H Vahakangas; M A Khan; P G Shields; C C Harris
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 7.996

5.  Negative effect of P72 polymorphism on p53 gene in IVF outcome in patients with repeated implantation failure and pregnancy loss.

Authors:  Belén Lledo; Azahara Turienzo; Jose A Ortiz; Ruth Morales; Jorge Ten; Joaquin Llácer; Rafael Bernabeu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Fluorescence polarization assay and inhibitor design for MDM2/p53 interaction.

Authors:  Rumin Zhang; Todd Mayhood; Philip Lipari; Yaolin Wang; James Durkin; Rosalinda Syto; Jennifer Gesell; Charles McNemar; William Windsor
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 3.365

7.  p53 polymorphic variants at codon 72 exert different effects on cell cycle progression.

Authors:  David Pim; Lawrence Banks
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2004-01-10       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  A second generation human haplotype map of over 3.1 million SNPs.

Authors:  Kelly A Frazer; Dennis G Ballinger; David R Cox; David A Hinds; Laura L Stuve; Richard A Gibbs; John W Belmont; Andrew Boudreau; Paul Hardenbol; Suzanne M Leal; Shiran Pasternak; David A Wheeler; Thomas D Willis; Fuli Yu; Huanming Yang; Changqing Zeng; Yang Gao; Haoran Hu; Weitao Hu; Chaohua Li; Wei Lin; Siqi Liu; Hao Pan; Xiaoli Tang; Jian Wang; Wei Wang; Jun Yu; Bo Zhang; Qingrun Zhang; Hongbin Zhao; Hui Zhao; Jun Zhou; Stacey B Gabriel; Rachel Barry; Brendan Blumenstiel; Amy Camargo; Matthew Defelice; Maura Faggart; Mary Goyette; Supriya Gupta; Jamie Moore; Huy Nguyen; Robert C Onofrio; Melissa Parkin; Jessica Roy; Erich Stahl; Ellen Winchester; Liuda Ziaugra; David Altshuler; Yan Shen; Zhijian Yao; Wei Huang; Xun Chu; Yungang He; Li Jin; Yangfan Liu; Yayun Shen; Weiwei Sun; Haifeng Wang; Yi Wang; Ying Wang; Xiaoyan Xiong; Liang Xu; Mary M Y Waye; Stephen K W Tsui; Hong Xue; J Tze-Fei Wong; Luana M Galver; Jian-Bing Fan; Kevin Gunderson; Sarah S Murray; Arnold R Oliphant; Mark S Chee; Alexandre Montpetit; Fanny Chagnon; Vincent Ferretti; Martin Leboeuf; Jean-François Olivier; Michael S Phillips; Stéphanie Roumy; Clémentine Sallée; Andrei Verner; Thomas J Hudson; Pui-Yan Kwok; Dongmei Cai; Daniel C Koboldt; Raymond D Miller; Ludmila Pawlikowska; Patricia Taillon-Miller; Ming Xiao; Lap-Chee Tsui; William Mak; You Qiang Song; Paul K H Tam; Yusuke Nakamura; Takahisa Kawaguchi; Takuya Kitamoto; Takashi Morizono; Atsushi Nagashima; Yozo Ohnishi; Akihiro Sekine; Toshihiro Tanaka; Tatsuhiko Tsunoda; Panos Deloukas; Christine P Bird; Marcos Delgado; Emmanouil T Dermitzakis; Rhian Gwilliam; Sarah Hunt; Jonathan Morrison; Don Powell; Barbara E Stranger; Pamela Whittaker; David R Bentley; Mark J Daly; Paul I W de Bakker; Jeff Barrett; Yves R Chretien; Julian Maller; Steve McCarroll; Nick Patterson; Itsik Pe'er; Alkes Price; Shaun Purcell; Daniel J Richter; Pardis Sabeti; Richa Saxena; Stephen F Schaffner; Pak C Sham; Patrick Varilly; David Altshuler; Lincoln D Stein; Lalitha Krishnan; Albert Vernon Smith; Marcela K Tello-Ruiz; Gudmundur A Thorisson; Aravinda Chakravarti; Peter E Chen; David J Cutler; Carl S Kashuk; Shin Lin; Gonçalo R Abecasis; Weihua Guan; Yun Li; Heather M Munro; Zhaohui Steve Qin; Daryl J Thomas; Gilean McVean; Adam Auton; Leonardo Bottolo; Niall Cardin; Susana Eyheramendy; Colin Freeman; Jonathan Marchini; Simon Myers; Chris Spencer; Matthew Stephens; Peter Donnelly; Lon R Cardon; Geraldine Clarke; David M Evans; Andrew P Morris; Bruce S Weir; Tatsuhiko Tsunoda; James C Mullikin; Stephen T Sherry; Michael Feolo; Andrew Skol; Houcan Zhang; Changqing Zeng; Hui Zhao; Ichiro Matsuda; Yoshimitsu Fukushima; Darryl R Macer; Eiko Suda; Charles N Rotimi; Clement A Adebamowo; Ike Ajayi; Toyin Aniagwu; Patricia A Marshall; Chibuzor Nkwodimmah; Charmaine D M Royal; Mark F Leppert; Missy Dixon; Andy Peiffer; Renzong Qiu; Alastair Kent; Kazuto Kato; Norio Niikawa; Isaac F Adewole; Bartha M Knoppers; Morris W Foster; Ellen Wright Clayton; Jessica Watkin; Richard A Gibbs; John W Belmont; Donna Muzny; Lynne Nazareth; Erica Sodergren; George M Weinstock; David A Wheeler; Imtaz Yakub; Stacey B Gabriel; Robert C Onofrio; Daniel J Richter; Liuda Ziaugra; Bruce W Birren; Mark J Daly; David Altshuler; Richard K Wilson; Lucinda L Fulton; Jane Rogers; John Burton; Nigel P Carter; Christopher M Clee; Mark Griffiths; Matthew C Jones; Kirsten McLay; Robert W Plumb; Mark T Ross; Sarah K Sims; David L Willey; Zhu Chen; Hua Han; Le Kang; Martin Godbout; John C Wallenburg; Paul L'Archevêque; Guy Bellemare; Koji Saeki; Hongguang Wang; Daochang An; Hongbo Fu; Qing Li; Zhen Wang; Renwu Wang; Arthur L Holden; Lisa D Brooks; Jean E McEwen; Mark S Guyer; Vivian Ota Wang; Jane L Peterson; Michael Shi; Jack Spiegel; Lawrence M Sung; Lynn F Zacharia; Francis S Collins; Karen Kennedy; Ruth Jamieson; John Stewart
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The p53 codon 72 single nucleotide polymorphism lacks a significant effect on implantation rate in fresh in vitro fertilization cycles: an analysis of 1,056 patients.

Authors:  George Patounakis; Nathan Treff; Xin Tao; Agnieszka Lonczak; Richard T Scott; John L Frattarelli
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  TP53 PIN3 and PEX4 polymorphisms and infertility associated with endometriosis or with post-in vitro fertilization implantation failure.

Authors:  D D Paskulin; J S L Cunha-Filho; C A B Souza; M C Bortolini; P Hainaut; P Ashton-Prolla
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 8.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.