PURPOSE: Investigate whether R72P on p53 gene polymorphism has a higher prevalence among women with a history of recurrent implantation failure (RIF) and pregnancy loss (RPL) and its influence in their IVF cycle outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: p53 polymorphism R72P has been studied in 181 women. The control group included 83 oocyte donors. In the study group 98 women were included: 44 with RIF and 54 with RPL. From the study group, 76 patients underwent IVF-cycles (55 RPL and 21 RIF). RESULTS: The frequency of PP genotypes on p53 among RIF was 11.4% compared with 18.5% for RPL and 6% in controls (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences with respect to patient characteristics. Significant differences were reported in pregnancy rate (69.4% for RR/RP and 33.3% for PP; p < 0.05), embryo implantation rate (33.3% for RR/RP and 7.3% for PP; p < 0.05) and ongoing pregnancy rate (53.1% for RR/RP and 14.3% for PP; p < 0.05) among RIF and RPL. CONCLUSIONS: This investigation reveals that in RIF and RPL patients R72P on p53 gene is more prevalent than fertile population. Moreover, patients carrying a PP genotype on p53 codon 72 will have less chance to achieve an ongoing pregnancy. This information together with some additional markers will allow development of diagnostic tests for detects risk for RIF and RPL before infertility treatment is initiated.
PURPOSE: Investigate whether R72P on p53 gene polymorphism has a higher prevalence among women with a history of recurrent implantation failure (RIF) and pregnancy loss (RPL) and its influence in their IVF cycle outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS:p53 polymorphism R72P has been studied in 181 women. The control group included 83 oocyte donors. In the study group 98 women were included: 44 with RIF and 54 with RPL. From the study group, 76 patients underwent IVF-cycles (55 RPL and 21 RIF). RESULTS: The frequency of PP genotypes on p53 among RIF was 11.4% compared with 18.5% for RPL and 6% in controls (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences with respect to patient characteristics. Significant differences were reported in pregnancy rate (69.4% for RR/RP and 33.3% for PP; p < 0.05), embryo implantation rate (33.3% for RR/RP and 7.3% for PP; p < 0.05) and ongoing pregnancy rate (53.1% for RR/RP and 14.3% for PP; p < 0.05) among RIF and RPL. CONCLUSIONS: This investigation reveals that in RIF and RPLpatientsR72P on p53 gene is more prevalent than fertile population. Moreover, patients carrying a PP genotype on p53 codon 72 will have less chance to achieve an ongoing pregnancy. This information together with some additional markers will allow development of diagnostic tests for detects risk for RIF and RPL before infertility treatment is initiated.
Authors: Hey-Joo Kang; Zhaohui Feng; Yvonne Sun; Gurinder Atwal; Maureen E Murphy; Timothy R Rebbeck; Zev Rosenwaks; Arnold J Levine; Wenwei Hu Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-05-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: D D Paskulin; J S L Cunha-Filho; C A B Souza; M C Bortolini; P Hainaut; P Ashton-Prolla Journal: Cell Death Dis Date: 2012-09-27 Impact factor: 8.469
Authors: Radia Boudjenah; Denise Molina-Gomes; Antoine Torre; Florence Boitrelle; Stéphane Taieb; Esther Dos Santos; Robert Wainer; Philippe de Mazancourt; Jacqueline Selva; François Vialard Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-09-23 Impact factor: 3.240