Literature DB >> 27897124

An acid tale of prion formation.

Mick F Tuite1.   

Abstract

Some bacteria use lactic acid to communicate with yeast cells.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dekkera bruxellensis; S. cerevisiae; Staphylococcus gallinarum; catabolite repression; chromosomes; genes; lactic acid; molecular communication; prion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27897124      PMCID: PMC5127635          DOI: 10.7554/eLife.22256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Elife        ISSN: 2050-084X            Impact factor:   8.140


Related research article Garcia DM, Dietrich D, Clardy J, Jarosz DF. 2016. A common bacterial metabolite elicits prion-based bypass of glucose repression. eLife 5:e17978. doi: 10.7554/eLife.17978 The transformation of grape juice into an appetising alcoholic beverage is not as straightforward as one might imagine. The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is responsible for fermenting the sugars naturally found in grapes to make ethanol and carbon dioxide. Yet grapes, like many fruits, also contain L-malic acid, which has a sour taste, so the winemaker must trigger a process known as malolactic fermentation to turn the offending L-malic acid into the more palatable and ‘softer’ tasting L-lactic acid. A variety of bacteria carry out the malolactic fermentation. Such bacteria may already be present on the skin of the grapes or the winemaker can add them after the alcoholic fermentation has taken place. Oenococcus oeni is the bacterium of choice for winemakers, partly because – unlike many other bacteria that produce lactic acid – it does not inhibit the ability of the yeast to ferment sugars. Louis Pasteur first noted that lactic acid-producing bacteria are often associated with failed wine fermentations over 140 years ago (Pasteur, 1873; Alexandre et al., 2004). Yet, we are only now beginning to understand the complexity of the interplay between these bacteria and yeast during winemaking, thanks largely to the work of the late Susan Lindquist (who died only last month), and Daniel Jarosz, who is now at Stanford University School of Medicine. Now, in eLife, David Garcia of Stanford, David Dietrich and Jon Clardy of Harvard Medical School, and Jarosz report that lactic acid produced by certain bacteria can trigger the formation of the [GAR+] prion in fermenting yeast (Garcia et al., 2016). Prions are made when proteins undergo a change in conformation and activity that they can sustain themselves and help other proteins to adopt. This in turn gives rise to a heritable form of the protein (known as the amyloid form) that assembles into clumps. However, unlike other yeast prions, the transmission of [GAR+] from cell to cell is not associated with a heritable amyloid. Rather, two other proteins contribute to the formation of the [GAR+] prion in yeast cells (Brown and Lindquist, 2009). But what has the [GAR+] prion got to do with lactic acid and failed wine fermentations? The [GAR+] prion triggers a remarkable reprogramming of the carbohydrate metabolism in the host cell. By overriding an ancient mechanism that promotes the breakdown of glucose over other sources of carbon, [GAR+] cells are able to metabolise a wide range of other carbon sources, even when glucose is present (Brown and Lindquist, 2009). This is bad news for the winemaker because [GAR+] cells generate less ethanol, which aids the growth of lactic acid-producing bacteria (Figure 1).
Figure 1.

Certain bacteria communicate with yeast cells via lactic acid.

L-malic acid (C4H6O5) is a natural component of grapes and other soft fruits, and it is decarboxylated by certain bacteria (red) during malolactic fermentation to produce L-lactic acid (C3H6O3) and carbon dioxide (CO2). The L-lactic acid can then induce the formation of the [GAR+] prion from the [gar] protein in yeast cells (yellow). Cells carrying this prion (dark yellow) produce less ethanol from the fermentation of sugars, which in turn provides an environment in which the bacteria can flourish. Winemakers try to promote the production of ethanol and reduce levels of malic acid.

Certain bacteria communicate with yeast cells via lactic acid.

L-malic acid (C4H6O5) is a natural component of grapes and other soft fruits, and it is decarboxylated by certain bacteria (red) during malolactic fermentation to produce L-lactic acid (C3H6O3) and carbon dioxide (CO2). The L-lactic acid can then induce the formation of the [GAR+] prion from the [gar] protein in yeast cells (yellow). Cells carrying this prion (dark yellow) produce less ethanol from the fermentation of sugars, which in turn provides an environment in which the bacteria can flourish. Winemakers try to promote the production of ethanol and reduce levels of malic acid. Earlier studies by Jarosz and Lindquist found that a wide range of bacteria secrete a chemical messenger (with a low molecular weight) that induces the appearance of [GAR+] in several different yeast species (Jarosz et al., 2014a, 2014b). Since this messenger was resistant to digestion by enzymes, researchers assumed that it was a metabolite. Garcia et al. now report that L-lactic acid can serve as this messenger. This is not to say that L-lactic acid is the only messenger. Moreover, it is striking that a number of lactic acid-producing bacteria do not induce the [GAR+] prion. These include O. oeni (Jarosz et al., 2014b), whose inability to induce the prion may well contribute to its suitability for wine production. It has been known for over 50 years that the interactions between yeast and the bacteria involved in malolactic fermentation depend on the combinations of species present (Fornachon, 1968), and now we better understand why such variation exists. The physical structure of the [GAR+] prion and the method by which lactic acid induces its formation remain to be established. However, the new communication mechanism discovered by Garcia et al. is important because it is beneficial to both yeast and bacteria in their native environments, and because it finally explains an observation first made by Pasteur over 140 years ago.
  6 in total

1.  Influence of different yeasts on the growth of lactic acid bacteria in wine.

Authors:  J C Fornachon
Journal:  J Sci Food Agric       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 3.638

Review 2.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae-Oenococcus oeni interactions in wine: current knowledge and perspectives.

Authors:  Hervé Alexandre; Peter J Costello; Fabienne Remize; Jean Guzzo; Michéle Guilloux-Benatier
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 5.277

3.  An evolutionarily conserved prion-like element converts wild fungi from metabolic specialists to generalists.

Authors:  Daniel F Jarosz; Alex K Lancaster; Jessica C S Brown; Susan Lindquist
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Cross-kingdom chemical communication drives a heritable, mutually beneficial prion-based transformation of metabolism.

Authors:  Daniel F Jarosz; Jessica C S Brown; Gordon A Walker; Manoshi S Datta; W Lloyd Ung; Alex K Lancaster; Assaf Rotem; Amelia Chang; Gregory A Newby; David A Weitz; Linda F Bisson; Susan Lindquist
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  A heritable switch in carbon source utilization driven by an unusual yeast prion.

Authors:  Jessica C S Brown; Susan Lindquist
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  A common bacterial metabolite elicits prion-based bypass of glucose repression.

Authors:  David M Garcia; David Dietrich; Jon Clardy; Daniel F Jarosz
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 8.140

  6 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae in neuroscience: how unicellular organism helps to better understand prion protein?

Authors:  Takao Ishikawa
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 5.135

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.