Literature DB >> 27896474

Worldwide prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes among singleton pregnancies after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jia-Bi Qin1,2, Xiao-Qi Sheng3, Di Wu4, Shi-You Gao5, Yi-Ping You6, Tu-Bao Yang7, Hua Wang8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The worldwide prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) in singleton pregnancies after in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is suggested to vary; however, a complete overview is missing. The aim of this review is to estimate the worldwide prevalence of APOs associated with IVF/ICSI singleton pregnancies.
METHODS: PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Libraries, and Chinese databases were searched for studies assessing APOs among IVF/ICSI singleton births through March 2016. The prevalence estimates were summarized and analyzed by meta-analysis.
RESULTS: Fifty-two cohort studies, with 181,741 IVF/ICSI singleton births and 4,636,508 spontaneously conceived singleton births, were selected for analysis. Among IVF/ICSI singleton pregnancies, pooled estimates were 10.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.0-11.8] for preterm birth, 2.4% (95% CI 1.9-3.0) for very preterm birth, 8.7% (95% CI 7.4-10.2) for low birth weight, 2.0% (95% CI 1.5-2.6) for very low birth weight, 7.1% (95% CI 5.5-9.2) for small for gestational age, 1.1% (95% CI 0.9-1.3) for perinatal mortality, and 5.7% (95% CI 4.7-6.9) for congenital malformations. The IVF/ICSI singleton pregnancies have higher prevalence of APOs compared with those conceived naturally (all P = 0.000). Significant differences in different continents, countries, income groups, and type of assisted conception were found.
CONCLUSIONS: The IVF/ICSI singleton pregnancies are at a higher prevalence of adverse perinatal outcomes compared with those conceived naturally. Important geographical differences were found. Yet, population-wide prospective APO registries covering the entire world population for IVF/ICSI pregnancies are needed to determine the exact perinatal prevalence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse pregnancy outcomes; In vitro fertilization; Intracytoplasmic sperm injection; Meta-analysis; Prevalence estimates

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27896474     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-016-4250-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  31 in total

Review 1.  In Vitro Fertilization Technology and Child Health.

Authors:  Michael von Wolff; Thomas Haaf
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 2.  In Vitro fertilization and adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes.

Authors:  Chantae S Sullivan-Pyke; Suneeta Senapati; Monica A Mainigi; Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 3.300

Review 3.  Origins of lifetime health around the time of conception: causes and consequences.

Authors:  Tom P Fleming; Adam J Watkins; Miguel A Velazquez; John C Mathers; Andrew M Prentice; Judith Stephenson; Mary Barker; Richard Saffery; Chittaranjan S Yajnik; Judith J Eckert; Mark A Hanson; Terrence Forrester; Peter D Gluckman; Keith M Godfrey
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Timing of exposure to gonadotropins has differential effects on the conceptus: evidence from a mouse model†.

Authors:  Chantae Sullivan-Pyke; Sneha Mani; Eric A Rhon-Calderon; Teri Ord; Christos Coutifaris; Marisa S Bartolomei; Monica Mainigi
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 4.285

5.  Association between first-trimester subchorionic hematoma detected at 6-8 weeks of gestation and pregnancy outcomes after fresh embryo transfers: a propensity score-matching cohort study.

Authors:  Rusha Yin; Kaixuan Wang; Linling Li; Yujie Dang; Bingyu Wang; Yan Sheng; Zengxiang Ma; Mei Sun
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Maternity After Orthotopic Liver Transplantation: Can the Use of Biological Fertility Indicators Help? Our Own Experience and Literature-based Recommendations.

Authors:  Antonio Castillo; María Eugenia Huete; Tania Errasti; Guillermo Pérez de Lema
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2022-01-10

7.  Maternal and obstetric outcomes are influenced by developmental stage and cryopreservation of transferred embryos after clomiphene citrate-based minimal stimulation IVF.

Authors:  Sachie Onogi; Kenji Ezoe; Nami Kawasaki; Hiroko Hayashi; Tomoko Kuroda; Kazumi Takeshima; Kaou Tanoue; Shogo Nishii; Keiichi Kato
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2022-04-08

8.  FIGO good practice recommendations on reduction of preterm birth in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Ben W Mol; Bo Jacobsson; William A Grobman; Kelle Moley
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 4.447

9.  Obstetrical complications of thin endometrium in assisted reproductive technologies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Youssef Mouhayar; Jason M Franasiak; Fady I Sharara
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Obstetrical outcomes of ART pregnancies in patients with male factor infertility.

Authors:  Isca Landesberg; Anat Lavie; Maya Ram; Michal Yechieli; Lee Reicher; Ariel Many; Sharon Morag; Yonit Schechtman
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.