Literature DB >> 27896077

Sequencing analysis of insulin receptor defects and detection of two novel mutations in INSR gene.

O Ardon1, M Procter2, T Tvrdik2, N Longo1, R Mao3.   

Abstract

Mutations in the insulin receptor gene cause the inherited insulin resistant syndromes Leprechaunism and Rabson-Mendenhall syndrome. These recessive conditions are characterized by intrauterine and post-natal growth restrictions, dysmorphic features, altered glucose homeostasis, and early demise. The insulin receptor gene (INSR) maps to the short arm of chromosome 19 and is composed of 22 exons. Here we optimize the conditions for sequencing this gene and report novel mutations in patients with severe insulin resistance.
METHODS: PCR amplification of the 22 coding exons of the INSR gene was performed using M13-tailed primers. Bidirectional DNA sequencing was performed with BigDye Terminator chemistry and M13 primers and the product was analyzed on the ABI 3100 genetic analyzer. Data analysis was performed using Mutation Surveyor software comparing the sequence to a reference INSR sequence (Genbank NC_000019).
RESULTS: We sequenced four patients with Leprechaunism or Rabson-Mendenhall syndromes as well as seven samples from normal individuals and confirmed previously identified mutations in the affected patients. Three of the four mutations identified in this group caused premature insertion of a stop codon. In addition, the INSR gene was sequenced in 14 clinical samples from patients with suspected insulin resistance and one novel mutation was found in an infant with a suspected diagnosis of Leprechaunism. DISCUSSION: Leprechaunism and Rabson-Mendenhall syndrome are very rare and difficult to diagnose. Diagnosis is currently based mostly on clinical criteria. Clinical availability of DNA sequencing can provide an objective way of confirming or excluding the diagnosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Donohue syndrome; Insulin receptor; Insulin resistance; Leprechaunism; Rabson–Mendenhall syndrome; Sequencing

Year:  2014        PMID: 27896077      PMCID: PMC5121292          DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2013.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Genet Metab Rep        ISSN: 2214-4269


Introduction

The insulin receptor is a membrane protein composed of two extracellular α subunits that bind insulin and two β subunits which span the plasma membrane and have an intracellular tyrosine kinase domain [1], [2]. Insulin binding to the α-subunits causes a conformational change that results in the activation of the kinase activity of the β-subunits with subsequent autophosphorylation and activation of kinase activity toward intracellular substrates [1], [2]. A single gene codes for both subunits. The resulting preprotein is post-translationally cleaved into mature alpha and beta subunits that assemble together as a heterotetramer to generate the mature insulin receptor [1], [2], [3]. The INSR gene maps to the short arm of chromosome 19 and is composed of 22 exons. Alternative splicing of the 36 base pair exon 11 results in two isoforms which differ in sequence at the C-terminal end of the insulin-binding alpha-subunit [3]. Mutations in INSR cause the insulin-resistant syndromes Leprechaunism, also known as Donohue syndrome [4], Rabson–Mendenhall syndrome and type A insulin resistance [5], [6]. Leprechaunism, (OMIM 246200), the most severe of the insulin resistant syndromes, is characterized by intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), loss of glucose homeostasis, hyperinsulinemia, and dysmorphic features, with prominent eyes, thick lips, upturned nostrils, low-set posteriorly rotated ears, thick skin with lack of subcutaneous fat, distended abdomen, and enlarged genitalia in the male and cystic ovaries in the female [7], [8], [9]. Cells from most patients with Leprechaunism have markedly reduced insulin binding, although exceptions were reported [10], [11]. The slightly less severe Rabson–Mendenhall syndrome (OMIM 262190) was first described in three siblings with dental and skin abnormalities, abdominal distension, phallic enlargement, early dentition, coarse senile-looking facies, striking hirsutism, intellectual disability, prognathism, thick fingernails and acanthosis nigricans. Insulin-resistant diabetes mellitus, ketoacidosis, intercurrent infections, pineal hyperplasia and ovarian tumor [12]. Children have initial postprandial hyperglycemia and fasting hypoglycemia, caused by inappropriately elevated insulin levels at the time of fasting [6], [13]. Patients with Rabson–Mendenhall syndrome can survive beyond 1 year of age and, with time, develop constant hyperglycemia followed by diabetic ketoacidosis and death. This is accompanied by a progressive decline of insulin levels, which become insufficient to prevent liver glucose synthesis and release of fatty acids by adipocytes [13]. Mutations in the insulin receptor can cause disease with a dominant pattern of inheritance as well. For example, a mutation (p.Gly996Val) in a conserved Gly-X-Gly-X-X-Gly motif impairs tyrosine kinase activity of the insulin receptor and is associated with insulin-resistant diabetes mellitus and acanthosis nigricans, suggesting a dominant-negative pathogenesis [14], [15], [16]. A different mutation (p.Arg1174Gln) with unknown functional effects in INSR is implicated in familial hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia type 5 in a few patients (HHF5) [17]. Leprechaunism and Rabson–Mendenhall syndrome are inherited as autosomal recessive traits. There is some correlation between genotype and phenotype, with mutations that markedly impair insulin binding resulting in the most severe phenotypes, while the presence of at least one mutation leaving residual insulin binding activity is associated with longer survival [6], [18]. Definitive genotype–phenotype correlation for INSR defects is difficult to establish primarily due to the rarity of these syndromes [6], a paucity of functional studies to determine the effect of mutations on insulin binding or signaling, and difficulty in establishing a precise molecular diagnosis due to the lack of clinically validated INSR gene sequencing [6], [19]. Herein we develop a clinically validated sequencing method to discover mutations in the INSR gene. Bidirectional sequencing with BigDye terminator and M13 primers was used to examine mutations in the coding regions and exon–intron boundaries of the INSR gene. A combination of the biochemical and DNA tests can provide accurate diagnosis for the insulin receptor deficiency.

Materials and methods

Patients/samples

DNA from 11 unrelated individuals (7 controls and 4 patients with Leprechaunism) was used to determine performance characteristics of this INSR full gene sequencing assay. Of these four patients with Leprechaunism, three of them, referred to here as 452, NY1, and 5880, had previously been described [6], [7], [23] Fibroblasts from each of these patients were received and DNA was extracted by MagNA Pure. The fourth patient with Leprechaunism, SLC, was not previously described but fit the clinical criteria. The diagnosis of Leprechaunism for all four patients was established from clinical presentation (failure to thrive, growth retardation, markedly elevated insulin levels, hirsutism, and acanthosis nigricans) and markedly reduced insulin binding to patients' fibroblasts. The samples were de-identified following an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved protocol. Fourteen additional samples referred to the ARUP Sequencing Laboratory by the patients' clinicians for INSR mutation detection were sequenced and analyzed.

DNA sequencing of the INSR gene

DNA was extracted from leukocytes in blood using MagNAPure Compact instrument (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN). Nucleic acid sequencing for the INSR gene coding region was performed by standard dideoxy termination. PCR primers were developed for the 22 exons of the INSR isoform containing exon 11 (NM_002082). Eighteen sets of PCR primers used in this validation were previously published [20], however, in the current study four sets of primers were re-designed to optimize PCR and sequencing results (see Table 1). We added another internal primer set to exon three interior to the homopolymer region to obtain cleaner sequence. In addition, exons 18 and 19 were consolidated into one amplicon. polymerase chain reaction of the 22 coding exons of the INSR gene was performed using M13-tailed primers Premix D (Epicentre, Madison, WI), and Platinum Taq (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) using PCR conditions shown in Table 2 below. Unused PCR primers and unincorporated nucleotides were inactivated by incubation with ExoSAP (USB Corporation, Cleveland, OH). Bidirectional DNA sequencing was performed with BigDye Terminator chemistry (ABI, Foster City, CA) and M13 primers (IDT, Coralville, IA) and the product was analyzed on the ABI 3730. Data analysis was performed using Mutation Surveyor software (SoftGenetics, State College, PA) and GenBank reference sequence NG_008852.1.
Table 1

Sequence of INSR primers used in the current study. Lower case letters represent the M13 tail sequence.

Primer nameSequence
IR E1FtgtaaaacgacggccagtCGCGCTCTGATCCGAGGAGA
IR E1RcaggaaacagctatgaccAGGGTTCTCAGTCCACAAGC
IR E2F #2tgtaaaacgacggccagtTCTTGCTTTCTGTTCATTTTC
IR E2R #2caggaaacagctatgaccACGAGACACTGCTTAGAACC
IR E3F #2tgtaaaacgacggccagtCAGACAGGAATTGGACAAA
IR E3F InttgtaaaacgacggccagtGACCATCTGTAAGTCACACG
IR E3RcaggaaacagctatgaccAGCAGAGACCTCACTCATAGCCAA
IR E4FtgtaaaacgacggccagtGCCTGAGATGTCTGAAGGAC
IR E4RcaggaaacagctatgaccGCCACTGAACGACCATCCTA
IR E5FtgtaaaacgacggccagtCTCACCATGGAGAATCATGA
IR E5RcaggaaacagctatgaccCTAATACACGAACTTCCTAG
IR E6F #2tgtaaaacgacggccagtCACACCATCTTGGAGTTGTA
IR E6RcaggaaacagctatgaccTGTAATGCACTTGAATCATGCTG
IR E7F #2tgtaaaacgacggccagtTTGGTCTGAAACTACACTGAAA
IR E7RcaggaaacagctatgaccAAACGTAGCAAGCACAGAGC
IR E8FtgtaaaacgacggccagtCGGTCTTGTAAGGGTAACTG
IR E8R #2caggaaacagctatgaccGCCAATAACCATATCAAGGA
IR E9FtgtaaaacgacggccagtGCACACTGTTTCTCATGATG
IR E9RcaggaaacagctatgaccAGAGGTGAAGCAAAGTGCAT
IR E10FtgtaaaacgacggccagtTGTTCAGCCGCAGAGACTTG
IR E10RcaggaaacagctatgaccCGGTCCCTAAGTAATGACCT
IR E11FtgtaaaacgacggccagtGTGGTCTGTCTAATGAAGTT
IR E11RcaggaaacagctatgaccGAATTGGTGAAGCATCTGCT
IR E12FtgtaaaacgacggccagtTGATGGTGATGGTGTCATCATA
IR E12RcaggaaacagctatgaccTGTCCTTGGTCAGCCTTGATGT
IR E13F #2tgtaaaacgacggccagtCAATCTTGTGGGATGAGTTT
IR E13RcaggaaacagctatgaccTACTAATAGCACAGTACCTG
IR E14FtgtaaaacgacggccagtTGGACACTCCCAGATGTGCA
IR E14RcaggaaacagctatgaccACCATGCTCAGTGCTAAGCA
IR E15FtgtaaaacgacggccagtGTGAACTTTGTTGGAAACACATTG
IR E15RcaggaaacagctatgaccCCTATACCTATATCAAGGCATG
IR E16FtgtaaaacgacggccagtTCTGCTGGTAAGGGCTGCCA
IR E16RcaggaaacagctatgaccCTCACTCAATGGTGAAGGCA
IR E17FtgtaaaacgacggccagtCCAAGGATGCTGTGTAGATAAG
IR E17RcaggaaacagctatgaccTCAGGAAAGCCAGCCCATGTC
IR E18–19FtgtaaaacgacggccagtGGAGAACCCTGGTGAGTC
IR E18–19RcaggaaacagctatgaccTCCTTCTGAAATCAAACCTG
IR E20FtgtaaaacgacggccagtAGGTTAAGAGCGTGTGAACCT
IR E20RcaggaaacagctatgaccGAATTCAAGCCCAGCGTCCAT
IR E21FtgtaaaacgacggccagtTGTTACTACTATCAACTGTC
IR E21RcaggaaacagctatgaccACCTGTAACATACAGCATGC
IR E22FtgtaaaacgacggccagtACTCACCCAGGACGTGTCCTTCT
IR E22RcaggaaacagctatgaccACCAGAGGAAAGCGAAAATG
Table 2

PCR conditions used in this study.

Temp (°C)
Rate (Δ°/cycle)
Time
Cycles
955 m
9430 s
62−0.545 s10
721 m

9430 s
5745 s25
725 m

Results

INSR mutation update

The INSR gene product contains 120 kilobases and is composed of 22 exons. There are three transcription initiation sites located at 276, 282 and 283 base pairs upstream of the translation initiation site. The alpha subunit is encoded by exons one through 11 (and part of exon 12) whereas the beta subunit is encoded by exons 12–22 [1], [2]. The insulin receptor is synthesized as a single protein that is post-translationally cleaved at a four amino acid site (p.759_762, RKRR, encoded by exon 12) to generate the mature alpha and beta subunit. The INSR gene product contains a leader sequence of 27 amino acids. Cleavage of these amino acids results in the mature active protein. As a result of this cleavage, the nomenclature of reported variations differs depending on the author, time of publication, and source of their reference DNA sequence. For this reason, we reviewed the published literature for all known INSR variations to determine the consistent amino acid position using the current nomenclature, in both the immature and the mature protein. Absolute nucleotide positions were kept consistent with the beginning of the cDNA regardless of protein cleavage (recommendations of the Human Genome Variation Society, http://www.hgvs.org/rec.html). In addition, the INSR gene has two isoforms that differ only by the 12 amino acids encoded by the alternatively spliced exon 11. These isoforms have slightly different reported biological activity and different abundance in different tissues with the isoform containing exon 11 being predominant in the liver; the other in leukocytes; with similar expression levels in most other tissues such as skeletal muscle, placenta and adipose tissue [21]. To date, there are 132 reports of disease causing mutations in the INSR gene in the literature (Table 4). The majority of the mutations (64%, or 85 of 132) are missense mutations, 13% (17 of 132) are nonsense mutation, 4.7% are splice site mutations, 8.3% are deletions (11/132), 2.3% are insertions (3/132), 1.5% are insertions and deletions (indel, 2/132), 5.3% are gross deletions or complex gene rearrangements (7/132) (Fig. 1). Most of the mutations located in the first 11 exons result in Leprechaunism while the mutations in the beta subunit are found more frequently in patients with Rabson–Mendenhall syndrome.
Table 4

Compilation of reported INSR mutations.

A. Missense/nonsense mutations
LocationMutation typeNucleotide changeAmino acid change (HGVS nomenclature)Amino acid change (legacy, mature protein)PhenotypeReference
Exon 1Nonsensec.90C > Ap.Tyr30TermTyr3TermRabson–Mendenhall syndrome[30]
Exon 2Missensec.121C > Tp.Arg41TrpArg14TrpRabson–Mendenhall syndrome[31]
Exon 2Missensec. 126C > Ap.Asn42LysAsn15LysLeprechaunism[32]
Exon 2Missensec.164T > Cp.Val55AlaVal28AlaLeprechaunism[33]
Exon 2Missensec.172G > Ap.Gly58ArgGly31ArgLeprechaunism[34]
Exon 2Missensec.257A > Gp.Asp86GlyAsp59GlyInsulin resistance[35]
Exon 2Missensec.266T > Cp.Leu89ProLeu62ProInsulin resistance[35]
Exon 2Missensec.338G > Cp.Arg113ProArg86ProLeprechaunism[8]
Exon 2Nonsensec.337C > Tp.Arg113TermArg86TermInsulin resistance[36]
Exon 2Missensec.356C > Tp.Ala119ValAla92ValLeprechaunism[6]
Exon 2Missensec.359T > Ap.Leu120GlnLeu93GlnInsulin resistance[37]
Exon 2Missensec.425G > Tp.Gly142ValGly115ValLeprechaunismThis report
Exon 2Missensec.433C > Tp.Arg145CysArg118CysInsulin resistance A[38]
Exon 2Missensec.438C > Gp.Ile146MetIle119MetInsulin resistance[39]
Exon 2Nonsensec.442A > Tp.Lys148TermLys121TermLeprechaunism[40]
Exon 2Nonsensec.451G > Tp.Glu151TermGlu124TermLeprechaunism[6]
Exon 2Nonsensec.479G > Ap.Trp160TermTrp133TermInsulin resistance[32]
Exon 2Missensec.499G > Tp.Val167LeuVal140LeuInsulin resistance A[41]
Exon 2Missensec.511T > Ap.Tyr171AsnTyr144AsnDiabetes, NIDDM[42]
Exon 2Missensec.515T > Gp.Ile172SerIle145SerDiabetes, NIDDM[42]
Exon 2Missensec.557G > Tp.Cys186PheCys159PheRabson–Mendenhall syndrome[19]
Exon 2Missensec.586T > Ap.Cys196SerCys169SerDiabetes, NIDDM[42]
Exon 2Missensec.628T > Ap.Trp210ArgTrp183ArgDiabetes, NIDDM[42]
Exon 3Missensec.659C > Tp.Pro220LeuPro193LeuLeprechaunism[43]
Exon 3Missensec.679G > Ap.Gly227SerGly200SerDiabetes, NIDDM[42]
Exon 3Missensec.694G > Ap.Gly232SerGly205SerDiabetes, NIDDM[42]
Exon 3Missensec.707A > Gp.His236ArgHis209ArgLeprechaunism[32]
Exon 3Missensec.712G > Ap.Glu238LysGlu211LysRabson–Mendenhall syndrome[30]
Exon 3Missensec.766C > Tp.Arg256CysArg229CysRabson–Mendenhall syndrome[19]
Exon 3Missensec.779T > Cp.Leu260ProLeu233ProInsulin resistance[44]
Exon 3Missensec.835C > Tp.Arg279CysArg252CysInsulin resistance[45]
Exon 3Missensec.836G > Ap.Arg279HisArg252HisInsulin resistance[37]
Exon 3Missensec.839G > Ap.Cys280TyrCys253TyrInsulin resistance A[46]
Exon 3Nonsensec.895C > Tp.Gln299TermGln272TermLeprechaunism[47]
Exon 3Missensec.902G > Ap.Cys301TyrCys274TyrLeprechaunism[48]
Exon 3Missensec.932G > Ap.Cys311TyrCys284TyrRabson–Mendenhall syndrome[49]
Exon 4Missensec.1049C > Tp.Ser350LeuSer323LeuInsulin resistance[50]
Exon 4Nonsensec.1072C > Tp.Arg358TermArg331TermInsulin resistance[51]
Exon 4Nonsensec.1114C > Tp.Arg372TermArg345TermInsulin resistance A[52]
Exon 5Missensec.1156G > Ap.Gly386SerGly359SerRabson–Mendenhall syndrome[53]
Exon 5Missensec.1177G > Ap.Gly393ArgGly366ArgLeprechaunism[54]
Exon 5Nonsensec.1195C > Tp.Arg399TermArg372TermInsulin resistance[55]
Exon 5Missensec.1225T > Gp.Phe409ValPhe382ValInsulin resistance[56]
Exon 5Nonsensec.1246C > Tp.Arg416TermArg389TermLeprechaunism[57]
Exon 6Missensec.1316G > Cp.Trp439SerTrp412SerLeprechaunism[58]
Exon 6Missensec.1372A > Gp.Asn458AspAsn431AspInsulin resistance[37]
Exon 6Missensec.1459A > Gp.Lys487GluLys460GluLeprechaunism[59]
Exon 6Missensec.1466A > Gp.Asn489SerAsn462SerInsulin resistance[32]
Exon 8Missensec.1627A > Tp.Thr543SerThr516SerDiabetes, NIDDM[42]
Exon 8Missensec.1650G > Ap.Ala550AlaAla523AlaAssociation with reduced diastolic blood pressure[60]
Exon 9Missensec.1975T > Cp.Trp659ArgTrp632ArgLeprechaunism[61]
Exon 10Nonsensec.2095C > Tp.Gln699TermGln672TermLeprechaunism[59]
Exon 10Missensec.2201A > Cp.Asp734AlaAsp707AlaLeprechaunism[62]
Exon 12Missensec.2286G > Tp.Arg762SerArg735SerInsulin resistance[63]
Exon 12Nonsensec.2437C > Tp.Arg813TermArg786TermLeprechaunism[64]
Exon 12Missensec.2453A > Cp.Tyr818CysTyr791CysLeprechaunism[65]
Exon 13Missensec.2572A > Gp.Thr858AlaThr831AlaDiabetes, NIDDM[66]
Exon 13Missensec.2621C > Tp.Pro874LeuPro847LeuLeprechaunism/Rabson–Mendenhall syndrome[31]
Exon 13Nonsensec.2668C > Tp.Arg890TermArg863TermLeprechaunism[65]
Exon 13Missensec.2669G > Cp.Arg890ProArg863ProDiabetes, NIDDM[42]
Exon 13Nonsensec.2673T > Ap.Tyr891TermTyr864TermInsulin resistance A[46]
Exon 14Missensec.2717C > Gp.Ala906GlyAla879GlyDiabetes, NIDDM[42]
Exon 14Nonsensec.2770C > Tp.Arg924TermArg897TermLeprechaunism[23]
Exon 14Missensec.2774T > Cp.Ile925ThrIle898ThrLeprechaunism[6]
Exon 14Missensec.2776C > Tp.Arg926TrpArg899TrpLeprechaunism[6]
Exon 14Missensec.2810C > Tp.Thr937MetThr910MetLeprechaunism[67]
Exon 16Missensec.2971C > Ap.Leu991IleLeu964IleLeprechaunismThis report
Exon 16Missensec.2989C > Ap.Pro997ThrPro970ThrRabson–Mendenhall syndrome[6]
Exon 17Missensec.3034G > Ap.Val1012MetVal985MetDiabetes, NIDDM[68]
Exon 17Missensec.3059G > Ap.Arg1020GlnArg993GlnInsulin resistance[69]
Exon 17Missensec.3067A > Tp.Ile1023PheIle996PheInsulin resistance[70]
Exon 17Nonsensec.3079C > Tp.Arg1027TermArg1000TermInsulin resistance[32]
Exon 17Missensec.3104G > Tp.Gly1035ValGly1008ValDiabetes, NIDDM[14]
Exon 17Missensec.3143G > Ap.Gly1048AspGly1021AspInsulin resistance[71]
Exon 17Missensec.3160G > Ap.Val1054MetVal1027MetLeprechaunism[61]
Exon 17Missensec.3164C > Tp.Ala1055ValAla1028ValInsulin resistance A[41]
Exon 17Missensec.3224C > Ap.Ala1075AspAla1048AspInsulin resistance[72]
Exon 17Missensec.3255C > Tp.His1085HisHis1058HisAssociation with polycystic ovary syndrome in lean women[29]
Exon 17Missensec.3257T > Ap.Val1086GluVal1059GluDiabetes, NIDDM[42]
Exon 18Missensec.3283A > Gp.Lys1095GluLys1068GluDiabetes, NIDDM[68]
Exon 18Missensec.3220G > Cp.Glu1074GlnGlu1047GlnRabson–Mendenhall syndrome[31]
Exon 18Missensec.3356G > Ap.Arg1119GlnArg1092GlnLeprechaunism[11]
Exon 18Missensec.3355C > Tp.Arg1119TrpArg1092TrpLeprechaunism[49]
Exon 19Missensec.3428T > Cp.Ile1143ThrIle1116ThrRabson–Mendenhall syndrome[13]
Exon 19Missensec.3436G > Cp.Gly1146ArgGly1119ArgInsulin resistance[71]
Exon 19Missensec.3439A > Tp.Met1147LeuMet1120LeuInsulin resistance A[73]
Exon 19Nonsensec.3447C > Ap.Tyr1149TermTyr1122TermInsulin resistance[37]
Exon 19Missensec.3470A > Gp.His1157ArgHis1130ArgInsulin resistance[74]
Exon 19Missensec.3471T > Ap.His1157GlnHis1130GlnDiabetes, NIDDM[42]
Exon 19Missensec.3473G > Ap.Arg1158GlnArg1131GlnInsulin resistance[75]
Exon 19Missensec.3472C > Tp.Arg1158TrpArg1131TrpRabson–Mendenhall syndrome[13]
Exon 19Missensec.3481G > Ap.Ala1161ThrAla1134ThrInsulin resistance[76]
Exon 19Missensec.3485C > Ap.Ala1162GluAla1135GluInsulin resistance[77]
Exon 20Missensec.3540G > Ap.Met1180IleMet1153IleInsulin resistance[78]
Exon 20Missensec.3572G > Ap.Arg1191GlnArg1164GlnDiabetes, NIDDM[79]
Exon 20Missensec.3602G > Ap.Arg1201GlnArg1174GlnInsulin resistance[80]
Exon 20Missensec.3601C > Tp.Arg1201TrpArg1174TrpLeprechaunism[81]
Exon 20Missensec.3614C > Tp.Pro1205LeuPro1178LeuInsulin resistance[82]
Exon 20Missensec.3618G > Cp.Glu1206AspGlu1179AspInsulin resistance[83]
Exon 20Missensec.3616G > Ap.Glu1206LysGlu1179LysLeprechaunism[49]
Exon 20Missensec.3659G > Tp.Trp1220LeuTrp1193LeuInsulin resistance[83]
Exon 21Missensec.3680G > Cp.Trp1227SerTrp1200SerInsulin resistance[76]
Exon 21Nonsensec.3769C > Tp.Gln1257TermGln1230TermInsulin resistance A[73]
Exon 22Missensec.4082A > Gp.Tyr1361CysTyr1334CysDiabetes, NIDDM[66]
Exon 22Missensec.4133G > Ap.Arg1378GlnArg1351GlnInsulin resistance[50]



Fig. 1

Summary of types of mutations found in the INSR gene.

Sequencing INSR

Four patients with known mutations were verified by the above sequencing protocol. The first patient, NY1, with clinically-confirmed Leprechaunism [6], [22], had a homozygous G to T variation at nucleotide 451 converting Glu 151 to a premature stop codon (c.451G > T,p.Glu151term). The second patient, 452, was a female infant with symptoms including repeated transient hypoglycemic episodes, prominent female genitalia, marked hirsutism, breast hyperplasia, loose and pachydermatous skin, decreased adipose tissue, acanthosis nigricans, and abdominal distention [7]. Sequencing results showed a heterozygous C to T nucleotide change at position 1195 coding for a premature stop codon at amino acid position 399 (c.1195C > T, p.Arg399term). A second mutation could not be detected by the assay as in the initial publication [7]. The third patient, 5880, had physical features of Leprechaunism and his lymphoblasts had a 90% decrease in the number of insulin receptors. This patient had a heterozygous C to T nucleotide change at position 2734 resulting in a change of arginine 924 to a premature stop codon (c.2770C > T, p.Arg924term) [23]. A second mutation could not be found even in this patient as in the original manuscript [24]. The forth patient, SLC, died before one year of age and had physical features of Leprechaunism. Insulin binding was reduced to about 4% of normal in fibroblasts from this patient. A novel G to T missense mutation was identified at nucleotide position 425 resulting in a change of glycine 142 to a valine (c.425G > T, p.Gly142Val). Computational prediction with the program Polyphen 2 (Harvard) predicts that a glycine to valine amino acid change at this position is “possibly damaging” with a score of 0.814 while SIFT (J Craig Venter Institute) predicts that the substitution is “damaging”. A second mutation could not be identified in this patient either. Seven additional samples from normal, healthy individuals displayed no INSR variants. However all samples (as well as the clinical samples above) were found to have a benign polymorphism at nucleotide position 5 changing alanine 2 to glycine (c.5C > G, p.Ala2Gly). An additional fourteen clinical samples (one sample from cultured amniocytes, four samples from pediatric patients and nine from adult patients) were referred to our lab for INSR sequencing. The clinical phenotype and laboratory results are summarized in Table 3. According to patient history received by ARUP with the amniotic sample, it was previously tested for deletions and duplications using a SNP array at another laboratory and was found to have a 63 kb deletion at 19p13.2 (7,143,507-7,206,857), including deletion of several exons of the INSR gene. Sequencing analysis detected no additional mutations. The 13 pediatric and adult patients presented with anomalies including, intra-uterine growth restriction (IUGR), failure to thrive (FTT), dysmorphic features, distended abdomen, and acanthosis nigricans. Although the major symptom was insulin resistance, the nine oldest patients tested were disproportionately female (7:2) with gynecological symptoms including menstrual irregularities and cystic ovaries. One 16 year old male patient had a history of IUGR, FTT, dysmorphic features, and poor response to exogenous insulin. Thirteen samples had no mutation detected by Sanger sequencing in the coding regions and exon/intron boundaries. An eleven week old boy with suspected Leprechaunism was homozygous for a variant of unknown clinical significance, c.2971C > A, p. Leu991Ile. For this patient, no positions of heterozygosity were observed in INSR, therefore we cannot rule out a partial or complete gene deletion. The infant was in intensive care and presented with IUGR, bilateral club feet, congenital hydrocephalus and dysmorphic features. Patient had only the right kidney and renal tubular acidosis. The patient had sporadic hypoglycemia and was noted to have glucose levels decreasing to 40 mg/dL range after 4–5 h of fasting, but given the age and size of the patient, this is of uncertain clinical significance. This patient also had elevated beta-hydroxybutyric acid of 14.1 mg/dL (reference range: 0.0–3.0) and a random insulin level of 1 μU/mL (reference range: 3–19 μU/mL). This variant (rs150114699) has been seen in the general population with a frequency of 0.4% in 1000 genomes and 0.6% in 6500 exomes in African Americans. The homozygous variant, c.2971C > A, p. Leu991Ile, has never been reported in the literature; sequence prediction programs give conflicting results about whether this substitution is likely to be deleterious (SIFT: deleterious; PolyPhen2: benign at score: 0.442). The next residue, Y992 is a conserved phosphorylation site in a highly conserved region (DGPLGPLyASSNPEY, http://www.phosphosite.org/siteAction.do?id=13426). The putative amino acid change at position L991 to the branched amino acid isoleucine may result in steric hindrance and decreased transporter activity. In light of the fact that the patient has only one kidney and is hypoglycemic, sequencing of HNF1B in this patient may be appropriate.
Table 3

Clinical information and laboratory results for patient samples sequenced in this study.

PatientAgeEthnicityGenderClinical and other findings
1FetusAsianNAReported advanced maternal age. A SNP array detected a 63 kb deletion involving deletion of exons 3–11 of the INSR gene: 19p13.2(7,143,507-7,206,857)x1; GRCh37/hg 19 sequencing of the coding exons ruled out second mutation
211 weeksAfrican-AmericanMPossible IUGR, dysmorphic features, distended abdomen, can fast for only 4–5 h after which the glucose levels drop to 40 s, insulin 1 μU/mL (refa 3–19), renal tubular acidosis type 4, only one kidney, bilateral club feet, congenital hydrocephalus not requiring shunt; c.2971C > A, p.Leu991Ile
31 yrbFIUGR, low glucose fasting (35–67 mg/dL), seizures; previous testing found “regions of homozygosity” in INSR region by SNP array
45 yrMulti-ethnicityMDelivered at 27 weeks and has complications of prematurity, holoprosencephaly, absence of corpus; loss of white matter on both occipital lobes, FTT, insulin 379.6 μU/mL (ref 3–17)
511 yrcFHypertriglyceridemia, low HDL cholesterol, high LDL cholesterol, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, acanthosis nigricans, glucose fasting normal, insulin 70.5 μU/mL (ref 3–12)
615 yrNAMExtreme insulin resistance type A
715 yrAfrican-AmericanFAcanthosis nigricans, amenorrhea, insulin 21 μU/mL (ref 3–19)
816 yrAfrican-AmericanMIUGR, FTT, dysmorphic features, lack of subcutaneous fat, poor response to exogenous insulin or hyperforin
921 yrAfrican-AmericanFAcanthosis nigricans, cystic ovaries, insulin 65.8 μU/mL (ref 2.6–24.9), severe insulin resistance, cystic ovaries. Medications: Trajenta, metformin, Depo–Provera therapy
1028 yrCaucasianFCystic ovaries, glucose fasting 89 mg/dL, hx of heavy irregular periods, mental health symptoms, cystic ovaries
1129 yrAsian IndianFAmenorrhea, cystic ovaries
1230 yrCaucasianFCystic ovaries
1350 yrNAFGlucose fasting, 277 mg/dL (ref 70–99) unknown if fasting, insulin antibody 1.9 U/mL(< 0.4), triglyceride 1302 mg/dL (ref 40–149); cholesterol 231 mg/dL (ref 120–199)
1466 yrCaucasianFAggression, hyper-androgenism, gingival hyperplasia, thick skin, amenorrhea, distended abdomen, reported high fasting glucose fasting, high postprandial glucose 1501 mg/dL (ref < 180 mg/dL)

Within normal reference range.

Patient from Haiti, ethnicity unknown.

Patient from Puerto Rico.

Discussion

Mutations in INSR can cause the insulin-resistant syndromes Leprechaunism, Rabson–Mendenhall syndrome, and type A insulin resistance [5], [6]. Diagnosis is established on clinical examination as well as laboratory diagnostic tests with markedly elevated insulin levels being a constant feature. Functional studies (insulin binding to cultured fibroblasts) and DNA analysis can be used for definitive confirmation, keeping in mind that certain mutations do not decrease insulin binding and that DNA analysis is still not identifying all putative mutations. Although there is no straightforward genotype–phenotype correlation, mutations affecting the alpha subunit of the receptor are associated with a more severe phenotype than the mutations affecting the beta subunit [25]. Due to the lack of a central repository of INSR mutations, we compiled a list of the published mutations, using currently accepted standards (Table 4). Our literature search of INSR mutations identified 132 causative variations. The vast majority of these variations are missense and nonsense mutations (78%) (Fig. 1). Interestingly, different missense mutations in the same codon have been reported to produce different phenotypes (Table 4). This highlights the need to expand the currently available databases to allow better understanding of the genotype–phenotype correlation. There are five reports of large deletions within the INSR gene including an entire gene deletion [26]. Gross deletions and gene rearrangements account for about 5% of the mutations [26]. Large deletions, as in one of our patients, can be detected by CGH/SNP arrays. For this reason, development of a commercial test to detect single exon and whole gene deletions may be attractive. No commercial deletion/duplication testing is currently available in the US; however, deletion and duplication testing is offered at laboratories in the United Kingdom and Germany. A multiplex ligation dependent probe amplification (MLPA) assay could be used to detect single exon deletions in the INSR gene. DNA sequencing can identify novel sequence variants of unknown clinical significance. In our study, we detected a novel c.425G > T, p. Gly142Val affecting the insulin binding alpha subunit of the insulin receptor. The evolutionary conservation analysis by Polyphen and SIFT predicts that a glycine to valine amino acid change at this position is “possibly damaging” or “damaging” to the function of the protein. Cells from this patient (TGB) failed to bind insulin, supporting a damaging role of the identified mutation. A second mutation in this patient could not be detected indicating the limitations of the current test in detecting mutations in the deep intronic or promoter regions or deletions, duplications, and rearrangements of the gene. In fact, sequencing failed to identify the second mutation in three patients with markedly reduced insulin binding in which previous studies also failed to detect the second pathogenic change [6], [13]. An additional sample of a pediatric patient referred for possible Leprechaunism was an apparent homozygous for c.2971C > A, p. Leu991Ile. A review of clinical data indicated normal to low insulin levels, a finding inconsistent with severe insulin resistance and indicating that the amino acid change is of unknown significance. As no positions of heterozygosity were observed in INSR, we cannot rule out a partial or complete gene deletion. The effect of a deletion of one copy of INSR in conjunction with this variant is yet to be studied. It should be noted that only one mutation was detected in the 14 samples sent for clinical testing. This may be related to the poor clinical selection of patients whose phenotypes were inconsistent with insulin resistance but were nevertheless referred for this INSR mutation detection assay. More specific selection of candidate patients may enhance the utility of the assay. Association studies show a strong correlation between single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the INSR gene and a predisposition to type 2 diabetes [27]. An alternative isoform of exon 8 in the INSR gene in the Han population confers increased risk for central obesity, hypertension, glucose intolerance, hyperinsulinemia and type 2 diabetes [28], whereas variation in exon 17 is associated with insulin resistance, hyperandrogenemism and polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) [29]. In conclusion, we report the development of a sequencing assay to detect mutations within the coding region and intron/exon boundaries of the INSR gene. Further development of deletion/duplication analysis is needed to detect deletions, duplications and large gene rearrangement of the INSR gene. A compilation of all the mutations reported to date using current terminology (Table 4) is the first step toward development of a publicly available online mutation database for the INSR gene.
  96 in total

1.  Hypoglycemia and resistance to ketoacidosis in a subject without functional insulin receptors.

Authors:  A L Ogilvy-Stuart; M A Soos; S J Hands; M Y Anthony; D B Dunger; S O'Rahilly
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Two related cases of type A insulin resistance with compound heterozygous mutations of the insulin receptor gene.

Authors:  Wataru Ogawa; Kazuya Iwamoto; Hiroyuki Mori; Mitsuru Hashiramoto; Kazuaki Miyake; Kazuhiko Sakaguchi; Masato Kasuga
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 5.602

3.  Association of the insulin-receptor variant Met-985 with hyperglycemia and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in the Netherlands: a population-based study.

Authors:  L M Hart; R P Stolk; R J Heine; D E Grobbee; F E van der Does; J A Maassen
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  The human insulin receptor cDNA: the structural basis for hormone-activated transmembrane signalling.

Authors:  Y Ebina; L Ellis; K Jarnagin; M Edery; L Graf; E Clauser; J H Ou; F Masiarz; Y W Kan; I D Goldfine
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Identification of novel C253Y missense and Y864X nonsense mutations in the insulin receptor gene in type A insulin-resistant patients.

Authors:  H Osawa; T Nishimiya; M Ochi; T Niiya; H Onuma; F Kitamuro; Y Kaino; K Kida; H Makino
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.438

6.  Homozygous nonsense mutation in the insulin receptor gene in infant with leprechaunism.

Authors:  A Krook; L Brueton; S O'Rahilly
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-07-31       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Homozygosity for a null allele of the insulin receptor gene in a patient with leprechaunism.

Authors:  J Hone; D Accili; H Psiachou; J Alghband-Zadeh; S Mitton; E Wertheimer; L Sinclair; S I Taylor
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.878

8.  An Arg for Gly substitution at position 31 in the insulin receptor, linked to insulin resistance, inhibits receptor processing and transport.

Authors:  E R van der Vorm; G C van der Zon; W Möller; H M Krans; D Lindhout; J A Maassen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1992-01-05       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Frequency of mutations of insulin receptor gene in Japanese patients with NIDDM.

Authors:  M Kan; F Kanai; M Iida; H Jinnouchi; M Todaka; T Imanaka; K Ito; Y Nishioka; T Ohnishi; S Kamohara
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 9.461

10.  Insulin-resistant diabetes associated with partial deletion of insulin-receptor gene.

Authors:  F Shimada; M Taira; Y Suzuki; N Hashimoto; O Nozaki; M Taira; M Tatibana; Y Ebina; M Tawata; T Onaya
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-05-19       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  15 in total

1.  Long-Term Effects of Metreleptin in Rabson-Mendenhall Syndrome on Glycemia, Growth, and Kidney Function.

Authors:  Marinna C Okawa; Elaine Cochran; Marissa Lightbourne; Rebecca J Brown
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Two Novel Variants and One Previously Reported Variant in the Insulin Receptor Gene in Two Cases with Severe Insulin Resistance Syndrome.

Authors:  Aydilek Dagdeviren Cakir; Said Saidov; Hande Turan; Serdar Ceylaner; Yavuz Özer; Tufan Kutlu; Oya Ercan; Olcay Evliyaoglu
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2020-03-18

3.  Insulin signaling is an essential regulator of endometrial proliferation and implantation in mice.

Authors:  Nikola Sekulovski; Allison E Whorton; Mingxin Shi; Kanako Hayashi; James A MacLean
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  A follow-up during puberty in a Japanese girl with type A insulin resistance due to a novel mutation in INSR.

Authors:  Akiko Saito-Hakoda; Aki Nishii; Takashi Uchida; Atsuo Kikuchi; Junko Kanno; Ikuma Fujiwara; Shigeo Kure
Journal:  Clin Pediatr Endocrinol       Date:  2018-01-30

5.  Mitotic regulators and the SHP2-MAPK pathway promote IR endocytosis and feedback regulation of insulin signaling.

Authors:  Eunhee Choi; Sotaro Kikuchi; Haishan Gao; Karolina Brodzik; Ibrahim Nassour; Adam Yopp; Amit G Singal; Hao Zhu; Hongtao Yu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 6.  Insulin Receptor Trafficking: Consequences for Insulin Sensitivity and Diabetes.

Authors:  Yang Chen; Lili Huang; Xinzhou Qi; Chen Chen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Insulin receptor endocytosis in the pathophysiology of insulin resistance.

Authors:  Catherine Hall; Hongtao Yu; Eunhee Choi
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 8.718

8.  The genome of the largest bony fish, ocean sunfish (Mola mola), provides insights into its fast growth rate.

Authors:  Hailin Pan; Hao Yu; Vydianathan Ravi; Cai Li; Alison P Lee; Michelle M Lian; Boon-Hui Tay; Sydney Brenner; Jian Wang; Huanming Yang; Guojie Zhang; Byrappa Venkatesh
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 6.524

9.  Classic Case Report of Donohue Syndrome (Leprechaunism; OMIM *246200): The Impact of Consanguineous Mating.

Authors:  Yousif Nijim; Youssef Awni; Amin Adawi; Abdalla Bowirrat
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  The Ubiquitin Ligase CHIP Integrates Proteostasis and Aging by Regulation of Insulin Receptor Turnover.

Authors:  Riga Tawo; Wojciech Pokrzywa; Éva Kevei; Melek E Akyuz; Vishnu Balaji; Svenja Adrian; Jörg Höhfeld; Thorsten Hoppe
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 41.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.