Literature DB >> 27895443

The validation and inter-rater reliability of the Serbian translation of the Richmond agitation and sedation scale in post anesthesia care unit patients.

Karlicic Stasevic1, M Stasevic1, S Jankovic2, Dejanovic Djukic3, A Dutina1, I Grbic1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Targeted light sedation is recommended because it shortens the time of mechanical ventilation and the length of stay in an intensive care unit (ICU). However, there is no validated scale for sedation and agitation in ICU in the Serbian speaking area. The aim of the current study was to validate, verify the reliability and enable the application of the Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS) in the Serbian speaking area.
METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, RASS was applied to 301 adult patients hospitalized in surgical ICUs by two different research team members. We tested RASS for inter-rater reliability by the correlation between them. The scale was validated by comparison to Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores which was applied by the third investigator. Interrater agreement was measured using weighted kappa (k) and for correlation Spearman's test was used.
RESULTS: The inter-rater reliability of the scale was high (k ˃0.7). The degree of correlation between the RASS and the GCS during all five days of observation was high (˃0.7 for both investigators, the fifth day). In all the cases, Spearman's correlation coefficient was highly significant (p ˂0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The Serbian translation of the RASS is a reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of the levels of sedation and agitation with patients in ICU. Hippokratia 2016, 20(1): 50-54.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale; intensive care unit; inter-rater reliability; validity

Year:  2016        PMID: 27895443      PMCID: PMC5074398     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippokratia        ISSN: 1108-4189            Impact factor:   0.471


  25 in total

1.  Multidisciplinary management of sedation and analgesia in critical care.

Authors:  C N Sessler; M J Grap; G M Brophy
Journal:  Semin Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.119

2.  Validity, reliability and applicability of Portuguese versions of sedation-agitation scales among critically ill patients.

Authors:  Antonio Paulo Nassar Junior; Ruy Camargo Pires Neto; Walquiria Barcelos de Figueiredo; Marcelo Park
Journal:  Sao Paulo Med J       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.044

3.  Appropriateness and reliability testing of the modified Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale in Spanish patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Benítez-Rosario; Manuel Castillo-Padrós; Belen Garrido-Bernet; Toribio González-Guillermo; Luis Pedro Martínez-Castillo; Aceysele González
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation.

Authors:  Diane Wild; Alyson Grove; Mona Martin; Sonya Eremenco; Sandra McElroy; Aneesa Verjee-Lorenz; Pennifer Erikson
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.725

Review 5.  Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Juliana Barr; Gilles L Fraser; Kathleen Puntillo; E Wesley Ely; Céline Gélinas; Joseph F Dasta; Judy E Davidson; John W Devlin; John P Kress; Aaron M Joffe; Douglas B Coursin; Daniel L Herr; Avery Tung; Bryce R H Robinson; Dorrie K Fontaine; Michael A Ramsay; Richard R Riker; Curtis N Sessler; Brenda Pun; Yoanna Skrobik; Roman Jaeschke
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Current practices and barriers impairing physicians' and nurses' adherence to analgo-sedation recommendations in the intensive care unit--a national survey.

Authors:  Barbara Sneyers; Pierre-François Laterre; Marc M Perreault; Dominique Wouters; Anne Spinewine
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Sedation assessment in a mobile intensive care unit: a prospective pilot-study on the relation of clinical sedation scales and the bispectral index.

Authors:  Johannes Prottengeier; Andreas Moritz; Sebastian Heinrich; Christine Gall; Joachim Schmidt
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Risk and clinical-outcome indicators of delirium in an emergency department intermediate care unit (EDIMCU): an observational prospective study.

Authors:  José Mariz; Nadine Correia Santos; Hugo Afonso; Pedro Rodrigues; António Faria; Nuno Sousa; Jorge Teixeira
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2013-01-29

Review 9.  Medications for analgesia and sedation in the intensive care unit: an overview.

Authors:  Diederik Gommers; Jan Bakker
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Effect of using Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale on duration of mechanical ventilation, type and dosage of sedation on hospitalized patients in intensive care units.

Authors:  Hojatollah Yousefi; Farzaneh Toghyani; Ahmad Reza Yazdannik; Kamran Fazel
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec
View more
  1 in total

1.  Cross-cultural adaptation of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale to Brazilian Portuguese for the evaluation of sedation in pediatric intensive care.

Authors:  Letícia Massaud-Ribeiro; Maria Clara de Magalhães Barbosa; Anderson Gonçalves Panisset; Jaqueline Rodrigues Robaina; Fernanda Lima-Setta; Arnaldo Prata-Barbosa; Antonio José Ledo Alves da Cunha
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.