Literature DB >> 23726218

Appropriateness and reliability testing of the modified Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale in Spanish patients with advanced cancer.

Miguel Angel Benítez-Rosario1, Manuel Castillo-Padrós, Belen Garrido-Bernet, Toribio González-Guillermo, Luis Pedro Martínez-Castillo, Aceysele González.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: A tool to quantify agitation severity and sedation level in patients with advanced cancer is needed.
OBJECTIVES: To test the appropriateness and reliability of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) in Spanish patients with advanced cancer.
METHODS: The original RASS was translated into Spanish according to the standard guidelines. Face validity was assessed by members of the palliative care team, and interrater reliability was assessed, using a weighted kappa, from observations of patients admitted to the palliative care unit. The association between scores of the RASS, Ramsay Sedation Scale, and Glasgow Coma Scale was evaluated using Spearman's ρ.
RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-two observations were performed in 156 patients: 116 observations were performed for delirious patients, 76 observations for sedated patients, and 130 observations for patients admitted for other symptom control. The weighted kappa values were practically equal to or greater than 0.90 between nurses and nurses and physicians. The agreement level between observers for each RASS score was roughly 90%. The correlation between the RASS and the Ramsay and Glasgow Scale values was analyzed for 196 observations recorded in 80 patients. The sedation scale of the RASS had a strong correlation with both the Ramsay (Spearman's ρ, -0.89; P < 0.001) and the Glasgow Coma Scales (Spearman's ρ, 0.85; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: These data support the use of the RASS in Spanish patients with advanced cancer.
Copyright © 2013 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23726218     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.05.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  11 in total

Review 1.  The reliability of the Glasgow Coma Scale: a systematic review.

Authors:  Florence C M Reith; Ruben Van den Brande; Anneliese Synnot; Russell Gruen; Andrew I R Maas
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  The validation and inter-rater reliability of the Serbian translation of the Richmond agitation and sedation scale in post anesthesia care unit patients.

Authors:  Karlicic Stasevic; M Stasevic; S Jankovic; Dejanovic Djukic; A Dutina; I Grbic
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 0.471

3.  Efficacy of two types of palliative sedation therapy defined using intervention protocols: proportional vs. deep sedation.

Authors:  Kengo Imai; Tatsuya Morita; Naosuke Yokomichi; Masanori Mori; Akemi Shirado Naito; Hiroaki Tsukuura; Toshihiro Yamauchi; Takashi Kawaguchi; Kaori Fukuta; Satoshi Inoue
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale modified for palliative care inpatients (RASS-PAL): a pilot study exploring validity and feasibility in clinical practice.

Authors:  Shirley H Bush; Pamela A Grassau; Michelle N Yarmo; Tinghua Zhang; Samantha J Zinkie; José L Pereira
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 3.234

5.  The outcome of agitation in poisoned patients in an Iranian tertiary care university hospital.

Authors:  Ali Mohammad Sabzghabaee; Ahmad Yaraghi; Elham Khalilidehkordi; Seyyed Mohammad Mahdy Mirhosseini; Elham Beheshtian; Nastaran Eizadi-Mood
Journal:  Neurol Res Int       Date:  2014-12-04

6.  Early sedation and clinical outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients: a prospective multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Lilian Maria Sobreira Tanaka; Luciano Cesar Pontes Azevedo; Marcelo Park; Guilherme Schettino; Antonio Paulo Nassar; Alvaro Réa-Neto; Luana Tannous; Vicente Ces de Souza-Dantas; André Torelly; Thiago Lisboa; Claudio Piras; Frederico Bruzzi Carvalho; Marcelo de Oliveira Maia; Fabio Poianas Giannini; Flavia Ribeiro Machado; Felipe Dal-Pizzol; Alexandre Guilherme Ribeiro de Carvalho; Ronaldo Batista dos Santos; Paulo Fernando Guimarães Morando Marzocchi Tierno; Marcio Soares; Jorge Ibrain Figueira Salluh
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Identification and evaluation of observational measures for the assessment and/or monitoring of level of consciousness in adult palliative care patients: A systematic review for I-CAN-CARE.

Authors:  Anna-Maria Krooupa; Bella Vivat; Stephen McKeever; Elena Marcus; Joseph Sawyer; Paddy Stone
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 5.713

8.  Cross-cultural adaptation of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale to Brazilian Portuguese for the evaluation of sedation in pediatric intensive care.

Authors:  Letícia Massaud-Ribeiro; Maria Clara de Magalhães Barbosa; Anderson Gonçalves Panisset; Jaqueline Rodrigues Robaina; Fernanda Lima-Setta; Arnaldo Prata-Barbosa; Antonio José Ledo Alves da Cunha
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar

Review 9.  Delirium diagnosis, screening and management.

Authors:  Peter G Lawlor; Shirley H Bush
Journal:  Curr Opin Support Palliat Care       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.302

10.  Population pharmacodynamic modelling of midazolam induced sedation in terminally ill adult patients.

Authors:  Linda G Franken; Brenda C M de Winter; Anniek D Masman; Monique van Dijk; Frans P M Baar; Dick Tibboel; Birgit C P Koch; Teun van Gelder; Ron A A Mathot
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.