| Literature DB >> 27893858 |
Michael Karbiener1, Jonathan C Jarvis2, Justin D Perkins3, Hermann Lanmüller4, Martin Schmoll2,4, Hanna S Rode3,5, Claus Gerstenberger1, Markus Gugatschka1.
Abstract
Age related atrophy of the laryngeal muscles -mainly the thyroarytenoid muscle (TAM)- leads to a glottal gap and consequently to a hoarse and dysphonic voice that significantly affects quality of life. The aim of our study was to reverse this atrophy by inducing muscular hypertrophy by unilateral functional electrical stimulation (FES) of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) in a large animal model using aged sheep (n = 5). Suitable stimulation parameters were determined by fatiguing experiments of the thyroarytenoid muscle in an acute trial. For the chronic trial an electrode was placed around the right RLN and stimulation was delivered once daily for 29 days. We chose a very conservative stimulation pattern, total stimulation time was two minutes per day, or 0.14% of total time. Overall, the mean muscle fiber diameter of the stimulated right TAM was significantly larger than the non-stimulated left TAM (30μm±1.1μm vs. 28μm±1.1 μm, p<0.001). There was no significant shift in fiber type distribution as judged by immunohistochemistry. The changes of fiber diameter could not be observed in the posterior cricoarytenoid muscle (PCAM). FES is a possible new treatment option for reversing the effects of age related laryngeal muscle atrophy.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27893858 PMCID: PMC5125708 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167367
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1A. Surgical procedure for FES device implantation. B. Overview of chronic electrical stimulation experiment
Fig 2Determination of optimal electrical stimulation parameters.
Representative traces of stimulation-induced contraction of laryngeal muscles, reflected by averaged pressure changes of a liquid-filled balloon that was positioned in the glottic rim. Decline in laryngeal muscle force relative to the first stimulation-induced contraction (n = 4).
Fig 3A-B. Analysis of stimulation-induced changes in muscle fiber diameter (MFD) of TAM (A) and PCAM (B). MFD values were grouped in 10 μm bins and are presented as percentage of total fibers 3C. Analysis of stimulation-induced changes in fiber type distribution. Relative percentages of type 1 and type 2 fibres for both muscles.
Fig 4Changes in RNA concentration of laryngeal muscles induced by electrical stimulation.
(A) Specific RNA yield for TAM. (B) Specific RNA yield for PCAM.
Fig 5RT-qPCR analysis to quantify the expression of myosin heavy chain isoforms in left (unstimulated) and right (stimulated) TAM (left panels) and PCAM (right panels).
(A) MYH4 (MyHC-IIb), (B) MYH1 (MyHC-IId/x), (C) MYH2 (MyHC-Iia), (D) MYH13 (MyHC-IIL), (E) MYH7 (MyHC-I).