Literature DB >> 23955603

Is there a minimum intensity threshold for resistance training-induced hypertrophic adaptations?

Brad J Schoenfeld1.   

Abstract

In humans, regimented resistance training has been shown to promote substantial increases in skeletal muscle mass. With respect to traditional resistance training methods, the prevailing opinion is that an intensity of greater than ~60 % of 1 repetition maximum (RM) is necessary to elicit significant increases in muscular size. It has been surmised that this is the minimum threshold required to activate the complete spectrum of fiber types, particularly those associated with the largest motor units. There is emerging evidence, however, that low-intensity resistance training performed with blood flow restriction (BFR) can promote marked increases in muscle hypertrophy, in many cases equal to that of traditional high-intensity exercise. The anabolic effects of such occlusion-based training have been attributed to increased levels of metabolic stress that mediate hypertrophy at least in part by enhancing recruitment of high-threshold motor units. Recently, several researchers have put forth the theory that low-intensity exercise (≤50 % 1RM) performed without BFR can promote increases in muscle size equal, or perhaps even superior, to that at higher intensities, provided training is carried out to volitional muscular failure. Proponents of the theory postulate that fatiguing contractions at light loads is simply a milder form of BFR and thus ultimately results in maximal muscle fiber recruitment. Current research indicates that low-load exercise can indeed promote increases in muscle growth in untrained subjects, and that these gains may be functionally, metabolically, and/or aesthetically meaningful. However, whether hypertrophic adaptations can equal that achieved with higher intensity resistance exercise (≤60 % 1RM) remains to be determined. Furthermore, it is not clear as to what, if any, hypertrophic effects are seen with low-intensity exercise in well-trained subjects as experimental studies on the topic in this population are lacking. Practical implications of these findings are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23955603     DOI: 10.1007/s40279-013-0088-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.136


  63 in total

Review 1.  Bigger weights may not beget bigger muscles: evidence from acute muscle protein synthetic responses after resistance exercise.

Authors:  Nicholas A Burd; Cameron J Mitchell; Tyler A Churchward-Venne; Stuart M Phillips
Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 2.665

2.  Resistance exercise load does not determine training-mediated hypertrophic gains in young men.

Authors:  Cameron J Mitchell; Tyler A Churchward-Venne; Daniel W D West; Nicholas A Burd; Leigh Breen; Steven K Baker; Stuart M Phillips
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2012-04-19

Review 3.  Applications of the dose-response for muscular strength development: a review of meta-analytic efficacy and reliability for designing training prescription.

Authors:  Mark D Peterson; Matthew R Rhea; Brent A Alvar
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Effects of low-intensity resistance exercise with slow movement and tonic force generation on muscular function in young men.

Authors:  Michiya Tanimoto; Naokata Ishii
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2005-12-08

Review 5.  The influence of frequency, intensity, volume and mode of strength training on whole muscle cross-sectional area in humans.

Authors:  Mathias Wernbom; Jesper Augustsson; Roland Thomeé
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Strength and skeletal muscle adaptations in heavy-resistance-trained women after detraining and retraining.

Authors:  R S Staron; M J Leonardi; D L Karapondo; E S Malicky; J E Falkel; F C Hagerman; R S Hikida
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1991-02

Review 7.  Cellular mechanisms regulating protein synthesis and skeletal muscle hypertrophy in animals.

Authors:  Mitsunori Miyazaki; Karyn A Esser
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2008-11-26

8.  Resistance exercise biology: manipulation of resistance exercise programme variables determines the responses of cellular and molecular signalling pathways.

Authors:  Barry A Spiering; William J Kraemer; Jeffrey M Anderson; Lawrence E Armstrong; Bradley C Nindl; Jeff S Volek; Carl M Maresh
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Low intensity blood flow restriction training: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jeremy P Loenneke; Jacob M Wilson; Pedro J Marín; Michael C Zourdos; Michael G Bemben
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Changes in muscle size and MHC composition in response to resistance exercise with heavy and light loading intensity.

Authors:  L Holm; S Reitelseder; T G Pedersen; S Doessing; S G Petersen; A Flyvbjerg; J L Andersen; P Aagaard; M Kjaer
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2008-09-11
View more
  19 in total

1.  Author's reply to Steele and Fisher: "Scientific rigour: a heavy or light load to carry?": the importance of maintaining objectivity in drawing evidence-based conclusions.

Authors:  B Schoenfeld
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Scientific rigour: a heavy or light load to carry?

Authors:  James Steele; James Fisher
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  High- and Low-Load Resistance Training: Interpretation and Practical Application of Current Research Findings.

Authors:  James Fisher; James Steele; Dave Smith
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Weight bearing exercise can elicit similar peak muscle activation as medium-high intensity resistance exercise in elderly women.

Authors:  Remco J Baggen; Evelien Van Roie; Jaap H van Dieën; Sabine M Verschueren; Christophe Delecluse
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-12-30       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Crescent pyramid and drop-set systems do not promote greater strength gains, muscle hypertrophy, and changes on muscle architecture compared with traditional resistance training in well-trained men.

Authors:  Vitor Angleri; Carlos Ugrinowitsch; Cleiton Augusto Libardi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Is resistance training intensity adequately prescribed to meet the demands of returning to sport following anterior cruciate ligament repair? A systematic review.

Authors:  Zackary William Nichols; Daniel O'Brien; Steven Gordon White
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2021-07-29

7.  Blood Flow Restriction Training.

Authors:  Daniel S Lorenz; Lane Bailey; Kevin E Wilk; Robert E Mangine; Paul Head; Terry L Grindstaff; Scot Morrison
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.824

Review 8.  Resistance Training for Patients with Cancer: A Conceptual Framework for Maximizing Strength, Power, Functional Mobility, and Body Composition to Optimize Health and Outcomes.

Authors:  Colin E Champ; David J Carpenter; Alexander K Diaz; Jared Rosenberg; Bradley G Ackerson; Parker N Hyde
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 11.928

9.  State of Knowledge on Molecular Adaptations to Exercise in Humans: Historical Perspectives and Future Directions.

Authors:  Kaleen M Lavin; Paul M Coen; Liliana C Baptista; Margaret B Bell; Devin Drummer; Sara A Harper; Manoel E Lixandrão; Jeremy S McAdam; Samia M O'Bryan; Sofhia Ramos; Lisa M Roberts; Rick B Vega; Bret H Goodpaster; Marcas M Bamman; Thomas W Buford
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 8.915

Review 10.  Effective utilization of genetic information for athletes and coaches: focus on ACTN3 R577X polymorphism.

Authors:  Naoki Kikuchi; Koichi Nakazato
Journal:  J Exerc Nutrition Biochem       Date:  2015-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.