Literature DB >> 22875064

Laryngeal pacing in minipigs: in vivo test of a new minimal invasive transcricoidal electrode insertion method for functional electrical stimulation of the PCA.

Gerhard Förster1, Dirk Arnold, Sabine J Bischoff, Harald Schubert, Hans-Christoph Scholle, Andreas H Müller.   

Abstract

Functional electrical stimulation (FES) of the posterior cricoarytenoid muscle (PCA) to restore respiratory function of the larynx may become an option for the treatment of bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis (RLNP) in the near future. The feasibility of this has been shown in several animal trials and in a human pilot study. The common open surgical inferolateral approach for electrode insertion into the PCA for FES has a risk of damaging the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) and may result in postoperative swelling and scaring of the larynx. Therefore, a minimal invasive electrode insertion technique is needed. A new miniaturized bipolar spiral tip electrode and a new electrical stimulatable insertion needle were tested in a short-term trial for an endoscopically guided and functionally controlled transcricoidal electrode insertion in eight Göttingen minipigs with bilateral normal RLN function. The feasibility of this technique was evaluated and the achieved positions of the electrodes in the PCA were analyzed using intraoperative stimulation threshold data and 3D-CT reconstructions. In seven cases it was possible to place two well-performing electrodes into the PCA. They were positioned one on either side. In one animal no functioning electrode position could be achieved because the PCA was missed. Thresholds of the electrode tips varied between 0.2 and 2.5 mA (mean 0.71 mA). In any case maximal glottal opening could be reached before adductors were co-activated. The majority of electrodes were placed into the central lower part of the PCA with no apparent correlation between threshold and electrode position. Surgical trauma might be further reduced by using endoscopy via a laryngeal mask avoiding the temporary tracheostomy used in this trial. If the implanted electrodes remain stable in long-term tests, we suggest that this method could soon be transferred into human application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22875064     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-012-2141-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  13 in total

1.  Determination of the optimal conditions for laryngeal pacing with the Itrel II implantable stimulator.

Authors:  D L Zealear; M R Swelstad; G D Sant'Anna; R A Bannister; C R Billante; R J Rodriguez; K C Garren; M J Billante; M S Champney
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  Improvement of respiratory compromise through abductor reinnervation and pacing in a patient with bilateral vocal fold impairment.

Authors:  Michael Broniatowski; Sharon Grundfest-Broniatowski; Aaron J Hadley; Nemath S Shah; Anca M Barbu; Sue Ann Phillipbar; Kingman P Strohl; Harvey M Tucker; Dustin J Tyler
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Control of paralysed axial muscles by electrical stimulation.

Authors:  D L Zealear; H H Dedo
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1977 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.494

4.  Airway management under general anaesthesia in pigs using the LMA-ProSeal: a pilot study.

Authors:  Kai Goldmann; Marc Kalinowski; Stephan Kraft
Journal:  Vet Anaesth Analg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.648

5.  Technical approach for reanimation of the chronically denervated larynx by means of functional electrical stimulation.

Authors:  D L Zealear; C L Rainey; M L Jerles; T Tanabe; G D Herzon
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 1.547

6.  Effects of denervation on posterior cricoarytenoid muscle physiology and histochemistry.

Authors:  D L Zealear; A L Hamdan; C L Rainey
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 1.547

7.  Electrical pacing of the paralyzed human larynx.

Authors:  D L Zealear; C L Rainey; G D Herzon; J L Netterville; R H Ossoff
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.547

8.  Reanimation of the paralyzed human larynx with an implantable electrical stimulation device.

Authors:  David L Zealear; Cheryl R Billante; Mark S Courey; James L Netterville; Randal C Paniello; Ira Sanders; Garrett D Herzon; George S Goding; Wolf Mann; Hasse Ejnell; Alfons M M C Habets; Roy Testerman; Paul Van de Heyning
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Rehabilitation of bilaterally paralyzed canine larynx with implantable stimulator.

Authors:  David L Zealear; Isamu Kunibe; Kenichiro Nomura; Cheryl Billante; Vikas Singh; Shan Huang; James Bekeny; Yash Choksi; Yasuaki Harabuchi; Akihiro Katada
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Long-term implantation of a system of electrical stimulation of paralyzed laryngeal muscles in dogs.

Authors:  K Bergmann; H Warzel; H U Eckhardt; U Hopstock; V Hermann; H J Gerhardt
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  3 in total

1.  Pre-clinical evaluation of a minimally invasive laryngeal pacemaker system in mini-pig.

Authors:  Gerhard Foerster; Dirk Arnold; Sabine Bischoff; Karsten Boltze; Hans-Christoph Scholle; Harald Schubert; Andreas H Mueller
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Unilateral and Bilateral Laryngeal Pacing for Bilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis.

Authors:  Maria E Powell; David L Zealear; Yike Li; C Gaelyn Garrett; Kate Von Wahlde; James Netterville
Journal:  Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep       Date:  2020-09-03

3.  Reversing Age Related Changes of the Laryngeal Muscles by Chronic Electrostimulation of the Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve.

Authors:  Michael Karbiener; Jonathan C Jarvis; Justin D Perkins; Hermann Lanmüller; Martin Schmoll; Hanna S Rode; Claus Gerstenberger; Markus Gugatschka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.