Dio Kavalieratos1, Jennifer Corbelli2, Di Zhang3, J Nicholas Dionne-Odom4, Natalie C Ernecoff5, Janel Hanmer2, Zachariah P Hoydich2, Dara Z Ikejiani2, Michele Klein-Fedyshin6, Camilla Zimmermann7, Sally C Morton8, Robert M Arnold9, Lucas Heller10, Yael Schenker9. 1. Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania2Center of Research on Health Care, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania3Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 2. Center of Research on Health Care, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 3. Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 4. School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham. 5. Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 6. Health Sciences Library System, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 7. Department of Supportive Care, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada8Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 8. College of Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg. 9. Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania2Center of Research on Health Care, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 10. Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.
Abstract
Importance: The use of palliative care programs and the number of trials assessing their effectiveness have increased. Objective: To determine the association of palliative care with quality of life (QOL), symptom burden, survival, and other outcomes for people with life-limiting illness and for their caregivers. Data Sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL to July 2016. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials of palliative care interventions in adults with life-limiting illness. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two reviewers independently extracted data. Narrative synthesis was conducted for all trials. Quality of life, symptom burden, and survival were analyzed using random-effects meta-analysis, with estimates of QOL translated to units of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-palliative care scale (FACIT-Pal) instrument (range, 0-184 [worst-best]; minimal clinically important difference [MCID], 9 points); and symptom burden translated to the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) (range, 0-90 [best-worst]; MCID, 5.7 points). Main Outcomes and Measures: Quality of life, symptom burden, survival, mood, advance care planning, site of death, health care satisfaction, resource utilization, and health care expenditures. Results: Forty-three RCTs provided data on 12 731 patients (mean age, 67 years) and 2479 caregivers. Thirty-five trials used usual care as the control, and 14 took place in the ambulatory setting. In the meta-analysis, palliative care was associated with statistically and clinically significant improvements in patient QOL at the 1- to 3-month follow-up (standardized mean difference, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.83; FACIT-Pal mean difference, 11.36] and symptom burden at the 1- to 3-month follow-up (standardized mean difference, -0.66; 95% CI, -1.25 to -0.07; ESAS mean difference, -10.30). When analyses were limited to trials at low risk of bias (n = 5), the association between palliative care and QOL was attenuated but remained statistically significant (standardized mean difference, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.34; FACIT-Pal mean difference, 4.94), whereas the association with symptom burden was not statistically significant (standardized mean difference, -0.21; 95% CI, -0.42 to 0.00; ESAS mean difference, -3.28). There was no association between palliative care and survival (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.17). Palliative care was associated consistently with improvements in advance care planning, patient and caregiver satisfaction, and lower health care utilization. Evidence of associations with other outcomes was mixed. Conclusions and Relevance: In this meta-analysis, palliative care interventions were associated with improvements in patient QOL and symptom burden. Findings for caregiver outcomes were inconsistent. However, many associations were no longer significant when limited to trials at low risk of bias, and there was no significant association between palliative care and survival.
Importance: The use of palliative care programs and the number of trials assessing their effectiveness have increased. Objective: To determine the association of palliative care with quality of life (QOL), symptom burden, survival, and other outcomes for people with life-limiting illness and for their caregivers. Data Sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL to July 2016. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials of palliative care interventions in adults with life-limiting illness. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two reviewers independently extracted data. Narrative synthesis was conducted for all trials. Quality of life, symptom burden, and survival were analyzed using random-effects meta-analysis, with estimates of QOL translated to units of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-palliative care scale (FACIT-Pal) instrument (range, 0-184 [worst-best]; minimal clinically important difference [MCID], 9 points); and symptom burden translated to the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) (range, 0-90 [best-worst]; MCID, 5.7 points). Main Outcomes and Measures: Quality of life, symptom burden, survival, mood, advance care planning, site of death, health care satisfaction, resource utilization, and health care expenditures. Results: Forty-three RCTs provided data on 12 731 patients (mean age, 67 years) and 2479 caregivers. Thirty-five trials used usual care as the control, and 14 took place in the ambulatory setting. In the meta-analysis, palliative care was associated with statistically and clinically significant improvements in patient QOL at the 1- to 3-month follow-up (standardized mean difference, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.83; FACIT-Pal mean difference, 11.36] and symptom burden at the 1- to 3-month follow-up (standardized mean difference, -0.66; 95% CI, -1.25 to -0.07; ESAS mean difference, -10.30). When analyses were limited to trials at low risk of bias (n = 5), the association between palliative care and QOL was attenuated but remained statistically significant (standardized mean difference, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.34; FACIT-Pal mean difference, 4.94), whereas the association with symptom burden was not statistically significant (standardized mean difference, -0.21; 95% CI, -0.42 to 0.00; ESAS mean difference, -3.28). There was no association between palliative care and survival (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.17). Palliative care was associated consistently with improvements in advance care planning, patient and caregiver satisfaction, and lower health care utilization. Evidence of associations with other outcomes was mixed. Conclusions and Relevance: In this meta-analysis, palliative care interventions were associated with improvements in patient QOL and symptom burden. Findings for caregiver outcomes were inconsistent. However, many associations were no longer significant when limited to trials at low risk of bias, and there was no significant association between palliative care and survival.
Authors: Matthew M Clark; Teresa A Rummans; Pamela J Atherton; Andrea L Cheville; Mary E Johnson; Marlene H Frost; Janis J Miller; Jeff A Sloan; Karen M Graszer; Jean G Haas; Jean M Hanson; Yolanda I Garces; Katherine M Piderman; Maria I Lapid; Pamela J Netzel; Jarrett W Richardson; Paul D Brown Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-08-28 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: James C Fang; Gregory A Ewald; Larry A Allen; Javed Butler; Cheryl A Westlake Canary; Monica Colvin-Adams; Michael G Dickinson; Phillip Levy; Wendy Gattis Stough; Nancy K Sweitzer; John R Teerlink; David J Whellan; Nancy M Albert; Rajan Krishnamani; Michael W Rich; Mary N Walsh; Mark R Bonnell; Peter E Carson; Michael C Chan; Daniel L Dries; Adrian F Hernandez; Ray E Hershberger; Stuart D Katz; Stephanie Moore; Jo E Rodgers; Joseph G Rogers; Amanda R Vest; Michael M Givertz Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2015-05-04 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: Glenn Gade; Ingrid Venohr; Douglas Conner; Kathleen McGrady; Jeffrey Beane; Robert H Richardson; Marilyn P Williams; Marcia Liberson; Mark Blum; Richard Della Penna Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Ross E O'Hara; Jay G Hull; Kathleen D Lyons; Marie Bakitas; Mark T Hegel; Zhongze Li; Tim A Ahles Journal: Palliat Support Care Date: 2010-09-28
Authors: Yael Schenker; Nathan Bahary; Rene Claxton; Julie Childers; Edward Chu; Dio Kavalieratos; Linda King; Barry Lembersky; Greer Tiver; Robert M Arnold Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2017-08-03 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Elizabeth J Lilley; Katherine C Lee; John W Scott; Nicole J Krumrei; Adil H Haider; Ali Salim; Rajan Gupta; Zara Cooper Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Claire J Creutzfeldt; Benzi Kluger; Adam G Kelly; Monica Lemmon; David Y Hwang; Nicholas B Galifianakis; Alan Carver; Maya Katz; J Randall Curtis; Robert G Holloway Journal: Neurology Date: 2018-06-27 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Jessica J Fulton; Thomas W LeBlanc; Toni M Cutson; Kathryn N Porter Starr; Arif Kamal; Katherine Ramos; Caroline E Freiermuth; Jennifer R McDuffie; Andrzej Kosinski; Soheir Adam; Avishek Nagi; John W Williams Journal: Palliat Med Date: 2018-11-29 Impact factor: 4.762
Authors: Teresa Hagan Thomas; Vicki A Jackson; Heather Carlson; Simone Rinaldi; Angela Sousa; Andrea Hansen; Mihir Kamdar; Juliet Jacobsen; Elyse R Park; William F Pirl; Jennifer S Temel; Joseph A Greer Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2018-10-25 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Emanuela Scarpi; Monia Dall'Agata; Vittorina Zagonel; Teresa Gamucci; Raffaella Bertè; Elisabetta Sansoni; Elena Amaducci; Chiara Maria Broglia; Sara Alquati; Ferdinando Garetto; Stefania Schiavon; Silvia Quadrini; Elena Orlandi; Andrea Casadei Gardini; Silvia Ruscelli; Daris Ferrari; Maria Simona Pino; Roberto Bortolussi; Federica Negri; Silvia Stragliotto; Filomena Narducci; Martina Valgiusti; Alberto Farolfi; Oriana Nanni; Romina Rossi; Marco Maltoni Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-10-24 Impact factor: 3.603