OBJECTIVE: Caregivers of patients with advanced cancer experience physical and emotional strain that can raise their own risk for morbidity and mortality. This analysis was performed to determine whether ENABLE II, a patient-focused palliative care intervention that increased patients' quality of life, reduced symptom intensity, and lowered depressed mood compared to usual care, would affect caregiver burden. METHOD: Caregivers of patients with advanced cancer from the parent study completed a caregiver burden scale and patients completed quality of life, symptom intensity, and depressed mood measures. Data were collected at baseline, 1 month, and every 3 months thereafter until patient death or the study ended. Decedents' caregivers were asked to complete an after-death interview regarding the quality of care that the patient received. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in caregiver burden between intervention and usual care conditions. Follow-up analyses showed that higher caregiver objective burden and stress burden were related to lower patient quality of life, higher symptom intensity, and higher depressed mood. Caregivers who perceived that patients had unmet needs at end of life reported higher objective burden, and those who perceived that patients were not treated with respect reported higher demand burden. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: The results indicate that a successful patient-focused intervention did not have a similar beneficial effect on caregiver burden. Future interventions should focus on caregivers as well as patients, with particular attention to caregivers' perceptions of patient care, and seek to change both negative and positive effects of informal caregiving.
OBJECTIVE: Caregivers of patients with advanced cancer experience physical and emotional strain that can raise their own risk for morbidity and mortality. This analysis was performed to determine whether ENABLE II, a patient-focused palliative care intervention that increased patients' quality of life, reduced symptom intensity, and lowered depressed mood compared to usual care, would affect caregiver burden. METHOD: Caregivers of patients with advanced cancer from the parent study completed a caregiver burden scale and patients completed quality of life, symptom intensity, and depressed mood measures. Data were collected at baseline, 1 month, and every 3 months thereafter until patient death or the study ended. Decedents' caregivers were asked to complete an after-death interview regarding the quality of care that the patient received. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in caregiver burden between intervention and usual care conditions. Follow-up analyses showed that higher caregiver objective burden and stress burden were related to lower patient quality of life, higher symptom intensity, and higher depressed mood. Caregivers who perceived that patients had unmet needs at end of life reported higher objective burden, and those who perceived that patients were not treated with respect reported higher demand burden. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: The results indicate that a successful patient-focused intervention did not have a similar beneficial effect on caregiver burden. Future interventions should focus on caregivers as well as patients, with particular attention to caregivers' perceptions of patient care, and seek to change both negative and positive effects of informal caregiving.
Authors: Gerd Inger Ringdal; Kristen Ringdal; Marit S Jordhøy; Marianne Ahlner-Elmqvist; Magnus Jannert; Stein Kaasa Journal: Palliat Med Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 4.762
Authors: Karl A Lorenz; Joanne Lynn; Sydney M Dy; Lisa R Shugarman; Anne Wilkinson; Richard A Mularski; Sally C Morton; Ronda G Hughes; Lara K Hilton; Margaret Maglione; Shannon L Rhodes; Cony Rolon; Virginia C Sun; Paul G Shekelle Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2008-01-15 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Young Sun Rhee; Young Ho Yun; Sohee Park; Dong Ok Shin; Kwang Mi Lee; Han Jin Yoo; Jeong Hwa Kim; Soon Ok Kim; Ran Lee; Youn Ok Lee; Nam Shin Kim Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-11-24 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Catherine E Mosher; Joseph G Winger; Nasser Hanna; Shadia I Jalal; Lawrence H Einhorn; Thomas J Birdas; DuyKhanh P Ceppa; Kenneth A Kesler; Jordan Schmitt; Deborah A Kashy; Victoria L Champion Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2016-07-09 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Catherine E Mosher; Mary A Ott; Nasser Hanna; Shadia I Jalal; Victoria L Champion Journal: Cancer Nurs Date: 2017 Jan/Feb Impact factor: 2.592
Authors: Dio Kavalieratos; Jennifer Corbelli; Di Zhang; J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Natalie C Ernecoff; Janel Hanmer; Zachariah P Hoydich; Dara Z Ikejiani; Michele Klein-Fedyshin; Camilla Zimmermann; Sally C Morton; Robert M Arnold; Lucas Heller; Yael Schenker Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-11-22 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: V Tsianakas; G Robert; A Richardson; R Verity; C Oakley; T Murrells; M Flynn; E Ream Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-03-06 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Adam E Singer; Joy R Goebel; Yan S Kim; Sydney M Dy; Sangeeta C Ahluwalia; Megan Clifford; Elizabeth Dzeng; Claire E O'Hanlon; Aneesa Motala; Anne M Walling; Jaime Goldberg; Daniella Meeker; Claudia Ochotorena; Roberta Shanman; Mike Cui; Karl A Lorenz Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2016-08-17 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Andres Azuero; Kathleen D Lyons; Jay G Hull; Tor Tosteson; Zhigang Li; Zhongze Li; Jennifer Frost; Konstantin H Dragnev; Imatullah Akyar; Mark T Hegel; Marie A Bakitas Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-03-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Marie A Bakitas; Tor D Tosteson; Zhigang Li; Kathleen D Lyons; Jay G Hull; Zhongze Li; J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Jennifer Frost; Konstantin H Dragnev; Mark T Hegel; Andres Azuero; Tim A Ahles Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-03-23 Impact factor: 44.544