Literature DB >> 30217664

An ethically-justifiable, practical approach to decision-making surrounding conjoined-twin separation.

Alana Thomas1, Karen Johnson1, Frank X Placencia2.   

Abstract

Conjoined twins present unique ethical and palliative care challenges. We present an ethically-justifiable, practical approach to decision-making with regards to surgical separation. These decisions must account for the short- and long-term prognoses for each infant prior to, and after, separation. Other considerations include the benefits and burdens of separation and the family's values and goals. Caregivers should recognize that decisions surrounding separation may be unduly influenced by social biases. The palliative care team aids in developing goals of care to guide decision-making by promoting communication between the medical team and family. They play an important role in supporting families regardless of the planned course of treatment. This support may be social or spiritual in nature, and is promoted by the interdisciplinary structure of the team. Early involvement of palliative care services facilitates complex decision making and can aid in the transition from cure-oriented therapies to support if needed during and after the dying process.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complex decision making; Conjoined twins; Ethics; Interdisciplinary team; Neonatology; Palliative care

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30217664      PMCID: PMC6786881          DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2018.07.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Perinatol        ISSN: 0146-0005            Impact factor:   3.300


  16 in total

1.  The Maltese conjoined twins. Two views of their separation.

Authors:  A J London
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.683

2.  Experience in the management of conjoined twins.

Authors:  L Spitz; E M Kiely
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 3.  Ethics and conjoined twins.

Authors:  Leigh Atkinson
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2004-07-17       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 4.  Conjoined twins.

Authors:  Lewis Spitz
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 5.  Palliative care for the family carrying a fetus with a life-limiting diagnosis.

Authors:  David Munson; Steven R Leuthner
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.278

6.  Thoracopagus conjoined twins.

Authors:  R Thomas Collins; Tricia R Bhatti; Dale S Huff; Paul M Weinberg
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Conjoined twins pregnancies: experience with 36 cases from a single center.

Authors:  M L Brizot; A W Liao; L M Lopes; M Okumura; M S Marques; V Krebs; R Schultz; M Zugaib
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 8.  Conjoined twins: From conception to separation, a review.

Authors:  Asma Mian; Nader Ishak Gabra; Tanuj Sharma; Nitsa Topale; Jerzy Gielecki; R Shane Tubbs; Marios Loukas
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.414

Review 9.  Association Between Palliative Care and Patient and Caregiver Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dio Kavalieratos; Jennifer Corbelli; Di Zhang; J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Natalie C Ernecoff; Janel Hanmer; Zachariah P Hoydich; Dara Z Ikejiani; Michele Klein-Fedyshin; Camilla Zimmermann; Sally C Morton; Robert M Arnold; Lucas Heller; Yael Schenker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  The best-interests standard as threshold, ideal, and standard of reasonableness.

Authors:  L M Kopelman
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  1997-06
View more
  1 in total

1.  Thoraco-omphalopagus conjoined twin: A rare case report.

Authors:  Diptee Poudel; Suraj Shrestha; Roshan Aryal; Ashmita Adhikari; Sunita Bajracharya
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2022-09-19
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.