Literature DB >> 17645468

Comparison of an inflammation-based prognostic score (GPS) with performance status (ECOG-ps) in patients receiving palliative chemotherapy for gastroesophageal cancer.

Andrew B C Crumley1, Robert C Stuart, Margaret McKernan, Alexander C McDonald, Donald C McMillan.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of the present study was to compare an inflammation-based prognostic score (Glasgow Prognostic Score, GPS) with performance status (ECOG-ps) in patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy for palliation of gastroesophageal cancer.
METHODS: Sixty-five patients presenting with gastroesophageal carcinoma to the Royal Infirmary, Glasgow between January 1999 and December 2005 and who received palliative chemotherapy or chemo-radiotherapy were studied. ECOG-ps, C-reactive protein, and albumin were recorded at diagnosis. Patients with both an elevated C-reactive protein (>10 mg/L) and hypoalbuminemia (<35 g/L) were allocated a GPS of 2. Patients in whom only one of these biochemical abnormalities was present were allocated a GPS of 1 and patients with a normal C-reactive protein and albumin were allocated a score of 0. Toxicity was recorded using the Common Toxicity Criteria.
RESULTS: The minimum follow up was 14 months. During the follow-up period, 59 (91%) of the patients died. On univariate and multivariate survival analysis, only the GPS (hazard ratios 1.65, 95% CI 1.10-2.47, P < 0.05) was a significant independent predictor of cancer survival. In addition, in comparison with patients with GPS of 0, those patients with a GPS of 1 or 2 required more frequent chemotherapy dose reduction (P < 0.05), were less likely to exhibit a clinical response to treatment (P < 0.05), and had shorter survival (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The presence of a systemic inflammatory response, as evidenced by the GPS, appears to be superior to the subjective assessment of performance status (ECOG-ps) in predicting the response to platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17645468     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.05105.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0815-9319            Impact factor:   4.029


  22 in total

1.  Comparison of pre-treatment clinical prognostic factors in patients with gastro-oesophageal cancer and proposal of a new staging system.

Authors:  Andrew B C Crumley; Robert C Stuart; Margaret McKernan; James J Going; Christopher J Shearer; Donald C McMillan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Glasgow Prognostic Score predicts poor prognosis among advanced biliary tract cancer patients with good performance status.

Authors:  Toshikazu Moriwaki; Kazunori Ishige; Masahiro Araki; Shigemasa Yoshida; Masaaki Nishi; Mikio Sato; Takeshi Yamada; Yoshiyuki Yamamoto; Mitsuharu Ozeki; Hiroyasu Ishida; Takashi Yamaguchi; Kenji Matsuda; Tetsuya Murashita; Masato Abei; Ichinosuke Hyodo
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Predictive value of baseline neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio for T4 disease in wall-penetrating gastric cancer.

Authors:  Masaki Aizawa; Naoto Gotohda; Shinichiro Takahashi; Masaru Konishi; Taira Kinoshita
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Prognostic significance of the modified Glasgow prognostic score in elderly patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kotaro Hirashima; Masayuki Watanabe; Hironobu Shigaki; Yu Imamura; Satoshi Ida; Masaaki Iwatsuki; Takatsugu Ishimoto; Shiro Iwagami; Yoshifumi Baba; Hideo Baba
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 7.527

5.  Adjuvant chemotherapy for resected colon cancer: comparison of the prognostic value of tumour and patient related factors.

Authors:  Campbell Roxburgh; Alec McDonald; Jonathan Salmond; Karin Oien; John Anderson; Ruth McKee; Paul Horgan; Donald McMillan
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Biomarker-based score to predict mortality in persons aged 50 years and older: a new approach in the Swedish AMORIS study.

Authors:  Mieke Van Hemelrijck; Danielle Harari; Hans Garmo; Niklas Hammar; Goran Walldius; Mats Lambe; Ingmar Jungner; Lars Holmberg
Journal:  Int J Mol Epidemiol Genet       Date:  2012-02-28

7.  Inflammation-based Prognostic Score as a Prognostic Biomarker in Patients With Recurrent and/or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated With Nivolumab Therapy.

Authors:  Mioko Matsuo; Ryuji Yasumatsu; Muneyuki Masuda; Satoshi Toh; Takahiro Wakasaki; Kazuki Hashimoto; Rina Jiromaru; Tomomi Manako; Takashi Nakagawa
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

8.  Glasgow Prognostic Score is superior to ECOG PS as a prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer with peritoneal seeding.

Authors:  Shu-Qiang Yuan; Run-Cong Nie; Yong-Ming Chen; Hai-Bo Qiu; Xiao-Ping Li; Xiao-Jiang Chen; Li-Pu Xu; Li-Fang Yang; Xiao-Wei Sun; Yuan-Fang Li; Zhi-Wei Zhou; Shi Chen; Ying-Bo Chen
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  The role of systemic inflammatory and nutritional blood-borne markers in predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival in oesophagogastric cancer.

Authors:  Fergus Noble; James Hopkins; Nathan Curtis; Jamie J Kelly; Ian S Bailey; James P Byrne; Adrian C Bateman; Andrew R Bateman; Timothy J Underwood
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.064

10.  Association between the inflammatory biomarker, C-reactive protein, and the response to radiochemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Harun Badakhshi; David Kaul; Kuai-LE Zhao
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-01-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.