Literature DB >> 20981494

Glasgow Prognostic Score is a predictor of perioperative and long-term outcome in patients with only surgically treated esophageal cancer.

Yogesh K Vashist1, Julian Loos, Josephine Dedow, Michael Tachezy, Guentac Uzunoglu, Asad Kutup, Emre F Yekebas, Jakob R Izbicki.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Systemic inflammation (SI) plays a pivotal role in cancer. C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin as parameters of SI form the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS). The purpose of the study was to evaluate the potential prognostic role of GPS in a homogeneous population of esophageal cancer (EC) patients undergoing only resection.
METHODS: GPS was evaluated on the basis of admission blood sample taken before surgery. Patients with a CRP < 10 mg/L and albumin > 35 g/L were allocated to GPS0 group. If only CRP was increased or albumin decreased patients were allocated to the GPS1 and patients in whom CRP was ≥10 mg/L and albumin level ≤35 g/L were classified as GPS2. GPS was correlated to clinicopathological parameters and clinical outcome.
RESULTS: Increasing GPS significantly correlated with more aggressive tumor biology in terms of tumor size (P < 0.001), presence of regional (P = 0.01) and nonregional lymph node metastasis (P = 0.02), and higher tumor recurrence rate (P < 0.001). Furthermore, GPS was identified as an independent prognosticator of perioperative morbidity (odds ratio 1.9; P = 0.03). In addition, a gradual decrease in disease-free and overall survival was evident between the three GPS subgroups. Survival differences between the GPS groups remained apparent even after stratification of the study population to underlying tumor type and nodal status. GPS was identified as a strong prognosticator of tumor recurrence (hazard ratio 2.5; P < 0.001) and survival (hazard ratio 3.0; P < 0.001) in EC.
CONCLUSIONS: GPS represents a strong prognosticator of perioperative morbidity and long-term outcome in resected EC patients without neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20981494     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1383-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  52 in total

1.  Preoperative controlling nutritional status (CONUT) is useful to estimate the prognosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Naoya Yoshida; Kazuto Harada; Yoshifumi Baba; Keisuke Kosumi; Masaaki Iwatsuki; Koichi Kinoshita; Kenichi Nakamura; Yasuo Sakamoto; Yuji Miyamoto; Ryuichi Karashima; Kosuke Mima; Hiroshi Sawayama; Mayuko Ohuchi; Akira Chikamoto; Yu Imamura; Masayuki Watanabe; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Clinical usefulness of the surgical Apgar score for estimating short-term and prognostic outcomes after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Naoya Yoshida; Hideo Baba
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Glasgow Prognostic Score as a useful prognostic factor after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Kei Horino; Toru Beppu; Hideyuki Kuroki; Kosuke Mima; Hirohisa Okabe; Osamu Nakahara; Yoshiaki Ikuta; Akira Chikamoto; Takatoshi Ishiko; Hiroshi Takamori; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Combined fibrinogen concentration and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic marker of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Takaaki Arigami; Yoshikazu Uenosono; Daisuke Matsushita; Shigehiro Yanagita; Yasuto Uchikado; Yoshiaki Kita; Shinichiro Mori; Yuko Kijima; Hiroshi Okumura; Kosei Maemura; Sumiya Ishigami; Shoji Natsugoe
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 5.  Metabolic syndrome and hepatic resection: improving outcome.

Authors:  Shefali Agrawal; Cherag Daruwala
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Pre-operative cardiopulmonary exercise testing predicts adverse post-operative events and non-progression to adjuvant therapy after major pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Vishnu V Chandrabalan; Donald C McMillan; Roger Carter; John Kinsella; Colin J McKay; C Ross Carter; Euan J Dickson
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 7.  Cachexia in patients with oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Poorna Anandavadivelan; Pernilla Lagergren
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  A nomogram to predict prognostic values of various inflammatory biomarkers in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jin-Shi Liu; Ying Huang; Xun Yang; Ji-Feng Feng
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 6.166

9.  Serum albumin as a significant prognostic factor in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Zhou-Hong Yao; Guang-Yan Tian; Shao-Xiang Yang; Yun-Yan Wan; Yan-Meng Kang; Qing-Hua Liu; Fei Yao; Dian-Jie Lin
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-04-15

10.  Clinicopathological factors predicting R0 resection and long-term survival after esophagectomy in patients with T4 esophageal cancer undergoing induction chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Karimata; Hideaki Shimoji; Tadashi Nishimaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.