Literature DB >> 27892889

The impact of functional vs degenerative mitral regurgitation on clinical outcomes among patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

René Vollenbroich1, Stefan Stortecky1, Fabien Praz1, Jonas Lanz1, Anna Franzone1, Katarzyna Zuk2, Dik Heg3, Marco Valgimigli1, Crochan John O'Sullivan4, Corinna Heinisch5, Eva Roost2, Peter Wenaweser6, Stephan Windecker1, Thomas Pilgrim7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Among patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), concomitant mitral regurgitation (MR) has been associated with adverse prognosis. We aimed to assess long-term clinical outcomes according to MR etiology.
METHODS: In a single-center registry of consecutive patients undergoing TAVI, we investigated the impact of functional (FMR) vs degenerative (DMR) MR on cardiovascular (CV) mortality throughout 2years of follow-up.
RESULTS: Among 603 patients (mean age 82.4±5.7years, 55% female) undergoing TAVI, 149 patients had moderate or severe MR (24.7%). Functional MR and DMR were documented in 53 (36%) and 96 (64%) patients, respectively. At 2years, patients with FMR and DMR had higher rates of CV mortality (30.2% vs 32.4%) as compared with patients with no MR (14.6%; FMR vs no MR: hazard ratio [HR] 2.32, 95% CI 1.34-4.02, P=.003; DMR vs no MR: HR 2.56, 95% CI 1.66-3.96, P<.001). In adjusted analyses, DMR was associated with an increased risk of CV mortality throughout the 2-year follow-up (adjusted HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.4-3.49, P=.001) as compared with FMR (adjusted HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.59-2.18, P=.707). Relevant MR was postprocedurally significantly reduced in both the DMR and FMR groups, whereas improvement of a decreased left ventricular ejection fraction was predominantly seen in the FMR group as compared with baseline.
CONCLUSION: Patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI complicated by moderate or severe MR portend impaired prognosis. Particularly, patients with DMR are at increased risk for CV mortality during long-term follow-up.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27892889     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of mitral regurgitation by an integrated 2D echocardiographic approach in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  R Jansen; A M Wind; M J Cramer; F Nijhoff; P Agostoni; F Z Ramjankhan; W J Suyker; P R Stella; S A J Chamuleau
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Is There Currently a Place for Combined Mitral and Aortic Transcatheter Interventions?

Authors:  Rodney De Palma; Crochan J O'Sullivan; Magnus Settergren
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Impact of aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis on organic and functional mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  Nahoko Kato; Jeremy J Thaden; William R Miranda; Christopher G Scott; Maurice E Sarano; Kevin L Greason; Patricia A Pellikka
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-10-15

4.  Relationship between Mitral Regurgitation and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: a Multi-Institutional Follow-up Study.

Authors:  Luciana de Cerjat Bernardes P da Cunha; Enio Eduardo Guerios; Claudio Leinig Pereira da Cunha; Luiz A Carvalho; Pedro Lemos Neto; Rogério Sarmento-Leite; Alexandre A Abizaid; José Antonio Mangione; Adriano Dourado Oliveira; Alexandre Siciliano; Vinicius Esteves; Fábio Sândoli de Brito
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 2.000

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.