Literature DB >> 27891607

Cortical and reticular contributions to human precision and power grip.

Toshiki Tazoe1,2, Monica A Perez1,2.   

Abstract

KEY POINTS: The corticospinal tract contributes to the control of finger muscles during precision and power grip. We explored the neural mechanisms contributing to changes in corticospinal excitability during these gripping configurations. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by cortical, but not by subcortical, stimulation were more suppressed during power grip compared with precision grip and index finger abduction. Intracortical inhibition was more reduced during power grip compared with the other tasks. An acoustic startle cue, a stimulus that engages the reticular system, suppressed MEP size during power grip to a lesser extent than during the other tasks at a cortical level and this positively correlated with changes in intracortical inhibition. Our findings suggest that changes in corticospinal excitability during gross more than fine finger manipulations are largely cortical in origin and that the reticular system contributed, at least in part, to these effects. ABSTRACT: It is well accepted that the corticospinal tract contributes to the control of finger muscles during precision and power grip in humans but the neural mechanisms involved remain poorly understood. Here, we examined motor evoked potentials elicited by cortical and subcortical stimulation of corticospinal axons (MEPs and CMEPs, respectively) and the activity in intracortical circuits (suppression of voluntary electromyography) and spinal motoneurons (F-waves) in an intrinsic hand muscle during index finger abduction, precision grip and power grip. We found that the size of MEPs, but not CMEPs, was more suppressed during power grip compared with precision grip and index finger abduction, suggesting a cortical origin for these effects. Notably, intracortical inhibition was more reduced during power grip compared with the other tasks. To further examine the origin of changes in intracortical inhibition we assessed the contribution of the reticular system, which projects to cortical neurons, and projects to spinal motoneurons controlling hand muscles. An acoustic startle cue, which engages the reticular system, suppressed MEP size during power grip to a lesser extent than during the other tasks and this positively correlated with changes in intracortical inhibition. A startle cue decreased intracortical inhibition, but not CMEPs, during power grip. F-waves remained unchanged across conditions. Our novel findings show that changes in corticospinal excitability present during power grip compared with fine finger manipulations are largely cortical in origin and suggest that the reticular system contributed, at least in part, to these effects.
© 2016 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology © 2016 The Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  corticospinal tract; grasping; primary motor cortex; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27891607      PMCID: PMC5390869          DOI: 10.1113/JP273679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  43 in total

Review 1.  Noninvasive stimulation of the human corticospinal tract.

Authors:  J L Taylor; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2004-04

2.  Coupling between mechanical and neural behaviour in the human first dorsal interosseous muscle.

Authors:  Anna L Hudson; Janet L Taylor; Simon C Gandevia; Jane E Butler
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-01-05       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Preferential activation of different I waves by transcranial magnetic stimulation with a figure-of-eight-shaped coil.

Authors:  K Sakai; Y Ugawa; Y Terao; R Hanajima; T Furubayashi; I Kanazawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Distinct influence of hand posture on cortical activity during human grasping.

Authors:  Monica A Perez; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Projections of cholinergic and non-cholinergic neurons of the brainstem core to relay and associational thalamic nuclei in the cat and macaque monkey.

Authors:  M Steriade; D Paré; A Parent; Y Smith
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Task dependence of responses in first dorsal interosseous muscle to magnetic brain stimulation in man.

Authors:  D Flament; P Goldsmith; C J Buckley; R N Lemon
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Giant neurons in the rat reticular formation: a sensorimotor interface in the elementary acoustic startle circuit?

Authors:  K Lingenhöhl; E Friauf
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Impaired response of human motoneurones to corticospinal stimulation after voluntary exercise.

Authors:  S C Gandevia; N Petersen; J E Butler; J L Taylor
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Motor cortex inhibition induced by acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Andrea A Kühn; Andrew Sharott; Thomas Trottenberg; Andreas Kupsch; Peter Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Fractionation of muscle activity in rapid responses to startling cues.

Authors:  Lauren R Dean; Stuart N Baker
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  17 in total

1.  Evidence for Subcortical Plasticity after Paired Stimulation from a Wearable Device.

Authors:  Maria Germann; Stuart N Baker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Changes in motor-evoked potential latency during grasping after tetraplegia.

Authors:  Hang Jin Jo; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Reticulospinal Contributions to Gross Hand Function after Human Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Stuart N Baker; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Gating of Sensory Input at Subcortical and Cortical Levels during Grasping in Humans.

Authors:  Yuming Lei; Recep A Ozdemir; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Phase-dependent deficits during reach-to-grasp after human spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Yuming Lei; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  High-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals differential cortical contributions to prepared responses.

Authors:  Victoria Smith; Dana Maslovat; Neil M Drummond; Joëlle Hajj; Alexandra Leguerrier; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  A Novel Wearable Device for Motor Recovery of Hand Function in Chronic Stroke Survivors.

Authors:  Supriyo Choudhury; Ravi Singh; A Shobhana; Dwaipayan Sen; Sidharth Shankar Anand; Shantanu Shubham; Suparna Gangopadhyay; Mark R Baker; Hrishikesh Kumar; Stuart N Baker
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 3.919

8.  Distinct Corticospinal and Reticulospinal Contributions to Voluntary Control of Elbow Flexor and Extensor Muscles in Humans with Tetraplegia.

Authors:  Sina Sangari; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Evidence for startle as a measurable behavioral indicator of motor learning.

Authors:  Nathan J Kirkpatrick; Vengateswaran J Ravichandran; Eric J Perreault; Sydney Y Schaefer; Claire F Honeycutt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Neurostimulation and Reach-to-Grasp Function Recovery Following Acquired Brain Injury: Insight From Pre-clinical Rodent Models and Human Applications.

Authors:  Charles-Francois V Latchoumane; Deborah A Barany; Lohitash Karumbaiah; Tarkeshwar Singh
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.