Juan C Infante1,2, Yu Liu3, Cynthia K Rigsby4,5,6. 1. Department of Radiology, University of Miami,, Miami, FL, USA. jinfante@med.miami.edu. 2. Department of Medical Imaging,, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago,, 225 E. Chicago Ave., Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. jinfante@med.miami.edu. 3. Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. 4. Department of Medical Imaging,, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago,, 225 E. Chicago Ave., Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. 5. Department of Radiology,, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine,, Chicago, IL, USA. 6. Department of Pediatrics,, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine,, Chicago, IL, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In our pediatric practice, we have observed qualitatively limited improvement in the image quality of images generated with sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) compared to series generated with filtered back projection (FBP), particularly in cases near or below a CT dose index volume (CTDIvol) of 1-mGy. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the image quality advantage of SAFIRE remains constant across clinically used CT dose levels in an American College of Radiology (ACR) CT accreditation phantom including the lower dose range used in pediatric imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An exemption from institutional review board approval was obtained for this phantom-based study. An ACR quality phantom was scanned in incremental kV steps and effective tube current intervals. Acquisitions were reconstructed with FBP and SAFIRE strengths of 1, 3 and 5. Image quality measures were calculated including signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), low-contrast resolution and high-contrast resolution. Peak SNR was also calculated. Descriptive and nonparametric statistics were used to compare these image quality metrics while normalizing to CT dose index (CTDI). RESULTS: The percent improvement in SNR and peak SNR of SAFIRE reconstructions compared to FBP decreased from about 70% for image sets acquired above a 1.42 mGy CTDI to 25% at a 0.25 mGy CTDI. CNR improvement with SAFIRE did not vary with dose. No significant difference was seen in the low-contrast resolution or high-contrast resolution of SAFIRE images compared to FBP. CONCLUSION: SNR did not improve equally after applying SAFIRE across a spectrum clinically used CTDIs. Below a threshold CTDI, the incremental improvement of SAFIRE compared to FBP decreased.
BACKGROUND: In our pediatric practice, we have observed qualitatively limited improvement in the image quality of images generated with sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) compared to series generated with filtered back projection (FBP), particularly in cases near or below a CT dose index volume (CTDIvol) of 1-mGy. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the image quality advantage of SAFIRE remains constant across clinically used CT dose levels in an American College of Radiology (ACR) CT accreditation phantom including the lower dose range used in pediatric imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An exemption from institutional review board approval was obtained for this phantom-based study. An ACR quality phantom was scanned in incremental kV steps and effective tube current intervals. Acquisitions were reconstructed with FBP and SAFIRE strengths of 1, 3 and 5. Image quality measures were calculated including signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), low-contrast resolution and high-contrast resolution. Peak SNR was also calculated. Descriptive and nonparametric statistics were used to compare these image quality metrics while normalizing to CT dose index (CTDI). RESULTS: The percent improvement in SNR and peak SNR of SAFIRE reconstructions compared to FBP decreased from about 70% for image sets acquired above a 1.42 mGy CTDI to 25% at a 0.25 mGy CTDI. CNR improvement with SAFIRE did not vary with dose. No significant difference was seen in the low-contrast resolution or high-contrast resolution of SAFIRE images compared to FBP. CONCLUSION: SNR did not improve equally after applying SAFIRE across a spectrum clinically used CTDIs. Below a threshold CTDI, the incremental improvement of SAFIRE compared to FBP decreased.
Authors: Andrew D Hardie; Sameer V Tipnis; William J Rieter; Michael S Rissing; Carlo N De Cecco Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2013 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Cynthia H McCollough; Lifeng Yu; James M Kofler; Shuai Leng; Yi Zhang; Zhoubo Li; Rickey E Carter Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-03-26 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Marcos Paulo Ferreira Botelho; Rishi Agrawal; Fernanda Dias Gonzalez-Guindalini; Eric M Hart; Suresh K Patel; Hüseyin Gürkan Töre; Vahid Yaghmai Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2013-08-06 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Daniele Marin; Rendon C Nelson; Sebastian T Schindera; Samuel Richard; Richard S Youngblood; Terry T Yoshizumi; Ehsan Samei Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Woo Hyeon Lim; Young Hun Choi; Ji Eun Park; Yeon Jin Cho; Seunghyun Lee; Jung Eun Cheon; Woo Sun Kim; In One Kim; Jong Hyo Kim Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 3.500