Literature DB >> 27890568

Dose calculation algorithm accuracy for small fields in non-homogeneous media: The lung SBRT case.

Antonella Fogliata1, Luca Cozzi2.   

Abstract

This review addresses the theme of dose calculation accuracy in the case of the stereotactic treatment of lung lesions. Based on the classical categories of type "a", "b" and "c" algorithms (according to their degree of complexity in the management of charged particle transport), a summary of findings from literature is reported. Two main critical areas have been identified: the use of small fields and the presence of low density medium. Concerning the latter point, the algorithm accuracy is intrinsic of the algorithm core, and, notwithstanding the materials discretization and their chemical composition knowledge, type "c" are, at the most, able to reproduce the actual physical dose distribution in heterogeneous media. For what concerns the small field management, the final accuracy could be strongly related to the beam configuration appropriateness in the TPS (as well for MC this relates to the proper linac head description). As a very crude summary, type "a" should be considered as unsuitable for this kind of treatment calculations (with differences of the order of 20-30%), while type "b" and "c" could keep their accuracy approximatively within 10 and 5%, respectively.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inhomogeneity; Low density; Lung SBRT; Small fields

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27890568     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.11.104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med        ISSN: 1120-1797            Impact factor:   2.685


  12 in total

1.  Effectiveness of robust optimization in volumetric modulated arc therapy using 6 and 10 MV flattening filter-free beam therapy planning for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy with a breath-hold technique.

Authors:  Hideharu Miura; Shuichi Ozawa; Yoshiko Doi; Minoru Nakao; Katsumaro Kubo; Masahiko Kenjo; Yasushi Nagata
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.724

2.  A depth dose study between AAA and AXB algorithm against Monte Carlo simulation using AIP CT of a 4D dataset from a moving phantom.

Authors:  Roger Cai Xiang Soh; Guan Heng Tay; Wen Siang Lew; James Cheow Lei Lee
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-09-03

3.  Assessment of Imprecise Small Photon Beam Modeling by Two Treatment Planning System Algorithms.

Authors:  Hadi Keivan; Daryoush Shahbazi-Gahrouei; Ahmad Shanei; Alireza Amouheidari
Journal:  J Med Signals Sens       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

4.  A multi-institutional study of independent calculation verification in inhomogeneous media using a simple and effective method of heterogeneity correction integrated with the Clarkson method.

Authors:  Shunta Jinno; Hidenobu Tachibana; Shunsuke Moriya; Norifumi Mizuno; Ryo Takahashi; Tatsuya Kamima; Satoru Ishibashi; Masanori Sato
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 2.724

5.  The role of dosimetry audit in achieving high quality radiotherapy.

Authors:  Catharine H Clark; Núria Jornet; Ludvig P Muren
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-03-21

6.  The Effect of Algorithms on Dose Distribution in Inhomogeneous Phantom: Monaco Treatment Planning System versus Monte Carlo Simulation.

Authors:  Taylan Tuğrul
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2021-08-07

7.  Dosimetric accuracy of three dose calculation algorithms for radiation therapy of in situ non-small cell lung carcinoma.

Authors:  Manda Švabić Kolacio; David Rajlić; Milan Radojčić; Đeni Smilović Radojčić; Nevena Obajdin; Dea Dundara Debeljuh; Slaven Jurković
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2022-03-22

Review 8.  The impact of technology on the changing practice of lung SBRT.

Authors:  Marianne Camille Aznar; Samantha Warren; Mischa Hoogeman; Mirjana Josipovic
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 2.685

9.  The impact of scanning data measurements on the Acuros dose calculation algorithm configuration.

Authors:  A Fogliata; E Esposito; L Paganini; G Reggiori; S Tomatis; M Scorsetti; L Cozzi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Experimental validation of Monte Carlo based treatment planning system in bone density equivalent media.

Authors:  Djeni Smilovic Radojcic; Bozidar Casar; David Rajlic; Manda Svabic Kolacio; Ignasi Mendez; Nevena Obajdin; Dea Dundara Debeljuh; Slaven Jurkovic
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.991

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.