Literature DB >> 27888060

Faith and oscillations recovered: On analyzing EEG/MEG signals during tACS.

Toralf Neuling1, Philipp Ruhnau2, Nathan Weisz3, Christoph S Herrmann4, Gianpaolo Demarchi3.   

Abstract

Despite recent success in analyzing brain oscillations recorded during transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), the field still requires further research to establish standards in artifact removal methods. This includes taking a step back from the removal of the tACS artifact and thoroughly characterizing the to-be-removed artifact. A recent study by Noury et al. (2016) contributed importantly to this endeavour by showing the existence of nonlinear artefacts in the tACS signal as seen by MEG and EEG. Unfortunately however this paper conveys the message that current artifact removal attempts have failed altogether and that-based on these available tools-brain oscillations recorded during tACS cannot be analyzed using MEG and EEG. Here we want to balance this overly pessimistic conclusion: In-depth reanalyses of our own data and phantom-head measurements indicate that nonlinearities can occur, but only when technical limits of the stimulator are reached. As such they are part of the "real" stimulation and not a specific MEG analysis problem. Future tACS studies should consider these technical limits to avoid any nonlinear modulations of the tACS artifact. We conclude that even with current approaches, brain oscillations recorded during tACS can be meaningfully studied in many practical cases.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; MEG; artifact removal; beamforming; brain oscillations; tACS

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27888060     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  22 in total

Review 1.  A New Unifying Account of the Roles of Neuronal Entrainment.

Authors:  Peter Lakatos; Joachim Gross; Gregor Thut
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Electrophysiology equipment for reliable study of kHz electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Mohamad FallahRad; Adantchede Louis Zannou; Niranjan Khadka; Steven A Prescott; Stéphanie Ratté; Tianhe Zhang; Rosana Esteller; Brad Hershey; Marom Bikson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  Current challenges: the ups and downs of tACS.

Authors:  Nicholas S Bland; Martin V Sale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Slow-oscillatory tACS does not modulate human motor cortical response to repeated plasticity paradigms.

Authors:  Claire Bradley; Jessica Elliott; Samuel Dudley; Genevieve A Kieseker; Jason B Mattingley; Martin V Sale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 2.064

5.  Targeting reduced neural oscillations in patients with schizophrenia by transcranial alternating current stimulation.

Authors:  Sangtae Ahn; Juliann M Mellin; Sankaraleengam Alagapan; Morgan L Alexander; John H Gilmore; L Fredrik Jarskog; Flavio Fröhlich
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation and Neurofeedback on Alpha (EEG) Dynamics: A Review.

Authors:  Mária Orendáčová; Eugen Kvašňák
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Synchronizing the transcranial magnetic pulse with electroencephalographic recordings effectively reduces inter-trial variability of the pulse artefact.

Authors:  Leo Tomasevic; Mitsuaki Takemi; Hartwig Roman Siebner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) Mechanisms and Protocols.

Authors:  Amir V Tavakoli; Kyongsik Yun
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 5.505

Review 9.  Non-invasive Brain Stimulation: A Paradigm Shift in Understanding Brain Oscillations.

Authors:  Johannes Vosskuhl; Daniel Strüber; Christoph S Herrmann
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 10.  Motor Cortical Gamma Oscillations: What Have We Learnt and Where Are We Headed?

Authors:  Magdalena Nowak; Catharina Zich; Charlotte J Stagg
Journal:  Curr Behav Neurosci Rep       Date:  2018-04-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.