Literature DB >> 2788401

A murine local lymph node assay for the identification of contact allergens. Assay development and results of an initial validation study.

I Kimber1, C Weisenberger.   

Abstract

The development of an alternative predictive test for the identification of contact sensitizing chemicals is described. The method is based upon the fact that, following epicutaneous application, sensitizing chemicals initiate a primary immunological response in the draining lymph node(s) which is characterized by lymphocyte proliferation. Experimental conditions for the measurement in vitro of the induced lymph node cell proliferative response have been optimized. On the basis of the data presented a local lymph node assay was developed in which CBA/Ca strain mice were exposed daily, for 3 consecutive days, to various concentrations of the test chemical, or to vehicle alone, on the dorsum of the ear. Lymph node activation was measured subsequently as a function of increased node weight, the frequency of large pyroninophilic cells and lymphocyte proliferation in the presence or absence of an exogenous source of interleukin 2 (IL-2). The results of a validation study are reported in which 22 well-characterized sensitizing chemicals of varying potency were examined. With the exception of three chemicals where water was used as the application vehicle, positive responses, defined as a substantial increase in lymphocyte proliferative activity, were recorded with all these test materials. Under the conditions employed non-sensitizing chemicals, including non-sensitizing irritant chemicals, failed to influence the immunological status of the draining lymph node. Taken together, the data suggest that the local lymph node assay provides the basis for a rapid and cost-effective alternative to the currently available guinea pig predictive test methods. The local lymph node assay may be of particular value for the evaluation of coloured or irritant chemicals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2788401     DOI: 10.1007/bf00278640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Toxicol        ISSN: 0340-5761            Impact factor:   5.153


  43 in total

1.  DELAYED CONTACT HYPERSENSITIVITY IN THE GUINEA PIG.

Authors:  E V BUEHLER
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  1965-02

2.  Assessment of the ability of mice fed on vitamin A supplemented diet to respond to a variety of potential contact sensitizers.

Authors:  J Maisey; K Miller
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 6.600

3.  Contact sensitivity in the mouse. XII. The use of DNA synthesis in vivo to determine the anatomical location of immunological unresponsiveness to picryl chloride.

Authors:  G L Asherson; R M Barnes
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 7.397

Review 4.  Cytology of the induction of hypersensitivity.

Authors:  J L Turk
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 4.291

5.  The effect of physical and chemical properties of the sensitizing substance on the induction and elicitation of delayed contact sensitivity.

Authors:  H P Godfrey; H Baer
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  The identification of contact allergens by animal assay. The guinea pig maximization test.

Authors:  B Magnusson; A M Kligman
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 8.551

Review 7.  Suppressive mechanisms involving sensitization and tolerance in contact allergy.

Authors:  H N Claman; S D Miller; M S Sy; J W Moorhead
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 12.988

8.  The identification of contact allergens by human assay. 3. The maximization test: a procedure for screening and rating contact sensitizers.

Authors:  A M Kligman
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 8.551

Review 9.  Contact allergy: predictive testing in man.

Authors:  F N Marzulli; H I Maibach
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 6.600

10.  Development and validation of an alternative dermal sensitization test: the mouse ear swelling test (MEST).

Authors:  S C Gad; B J Dunn; D W Dobbs; C Reilly; R D Walsh
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1986-06-15       Impact factor: 4.219

View more
  10 in total

1.  A plasmacytoid dendritic cell (CD123+/CD11c-) based assay system to predict contact allergenicity of chemicals.

Authors:  Seyoum Ayehunie; Maureen Snell; Matthew Child; Mitchell Klausner
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 4.221

2.  Novel predictive assay for contact allergens using human skin explant cultures.

Authors:  F H Pistoor; A Rambukkana; M Kroezen; J P Lepoittevin; J D Bos; M L Kapsenberg; P K Das
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 3.  Skin and respiratory chemical allergy: confluence and divergence in a hybrid adverse outcome pathway.

Authors:  Ian Kimber; Alan Poole; David A Basketter
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 3.524

4.  PreS/MD: Predictor of Sensitization Hazard for Chemical Substances Released From Medical Devices.

Authors:  Vinicius M Alves; Joyce V B Borba; Rodolpho C Braga; Daniel R Korn; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Kevin Causey; Alexander Tropsha; Diego Rua; Eugene N Muratov
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 4.109

5.  A sensitive mouse lymph node assay with two application phases for detection of contact allergens.

Authors:  Y Ikarashi; T Tsuchiya; A Nakamura
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 6.  Allergic contact dermatitis: epidemiology, molecular mechanisms, in vitro methods and regulatory aspects. Current knowledge assembled at an international workshop at BfR, Germany.

Authors:  M Peiser; T Tralau; J Heidler; A M Api; J H E Arts; D A Basketter; J English; T L Diepgen; R C Fuhlbrigge; A A Gaspari; J D Johansen; A T Karlberg; I Kimber; J P Lepoittevin; M Liebsch; H I Maibach; S F Martin; H F Merk; T Platzek; T Rustemeyer; A Schnuch; R J Vandebriel; I R White; A Luch
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 9.261

7.  Effect of mouse strain in a model of chemical-induced respiratory allergy.

Authors:  Risako Nishino; Tomoki Fukuyama; Yuko Watanabe; Yoshimi Kurosawa; Hideo Ueda; Tadashi Kosaka
Journal:  Exp Anim       Date:  2014-07-22

8.  Evaluation of a High-Throughput Peptide Reactivity Format Assay for Assessment of the Skin Sensitization Potential of Chemicals.

Authors:  Chin Lin Wong; Ai-Leen Lam; Maree T Smith; Sussan Ghassabian
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 5.810

9.  The Fate of a Hapten - From the Skin to Modification of Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor (MIF) in Lymph Nodes.

Authors:  Isabella Karlsson; Kristin Samuelsson; Carl Simonsson; Anna-Lena Stenfeldt; Ulrika Nilsson; Leopold L Ilag; Charlotte Jonsson; Ann-Therese Karlberg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Mechanistic relationship among mutagenicity, skin sensitization, and skin carcinogenicity.

Authors:  J Ashby; J Hilton; R J Dearman; R D Callander; I Kimber
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-04-22       Impact factor: 9.031

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.