The inhalation of many types of chemicals is a leading cause of allergic respiratory diseases, and effective protocols are needed for the detection of environmental chemical-related respiratory allergies. In our previous studies, we developed a method for detecting environmental chemical-related respiratory allergens by using a long-term sensitization-challenge protocol involving BALB/c mice. In the current study, we sought to improve our model by characterizing strain-associated differences in respiratory allergic reactions to the well-known chemical respiratory allergen glutaraldehyde (GA). According to our protocol, BALB/c, NC/Nga, C3H/HeN, C57BL/6N, and CBA/J mice were sensitized dermally with GA for 3 weeks and then challenged with intratracheal or inhaled GA at 2 weeks after the last sensitization. The day after the final challenge, all mice were euthanized, and total serum IgE levels were assayed. In addition, immunocyte counts, cytokine production, and chemokine levels in the hilar lymph nodes (LNs) and bronchoalveolar lavage fluids (BALF) were also assessed. In conclusion, BALB/c and NC/Nga mice demonstrated markedly increased IgE reactions. Inflammatory cell counts in BALF were increased in the treated groups of all strains, especially BALB/c, NC/Nga, and CBA/J strains. Cytokine levels in LNs were increased in all treated groups except for C3H/HeN and were particularly high in BALB/c and NC/Nga mice. According to our results, we suggest that BALB/c and NC/Nga are highly susceptible to respiratory allergic responses and therefore are good candidates for use in our model for detecting environmental chemical respiratory allergens.
The inhalation of many types of chemicals is a leading cause of allergic respiratory diseases, and effective protocols are needed for the detection of environmental chemical-related respiratory allergies. In our previous studies, we developed a method for detecting environmental chemical-related respiratory allergens by using a long-term sensitization-challenge protocol involving BALB/c mice. In the current study, we sought to improve our model by characterizing strain-associated differences in respiratory allergic reactions to the well-known chemical respiratory allergen glutaraldehyde (GA). According to our protocol, BALB/c, NC/Nga, C3H/HeN, C57BL/6N, and CBA/J mice were sensitized dermally with GA for 3 weeks and then challenged with intratracheal or inhaled GA at 2 weeks after the last sensitization. The day after the final challenge, all mice were euthanized, and total serum IgE levels were assayed. In addition, immunocyte counts, cytokine production, and chemokine levels in the hilar lymph nodes (LNs) and bronchoalveolar lavage fluids (BALF) were also assessed. In conclusion, BALB/c and NC/Ngamice demonstrated markedly increased IgE reactions. Inflammatory cell counts in BALF were increased in the treated groups of all strains, especially BALB/c, NC/Nga, and CBA/J strains. Cytokine levels in LNs were increased in all treated groups except for C3H/HeN and were particularly high in BALB/c and NC/Ngamice. According to our results, we suggest that BALB/c and NC/Nga are highly susceptible to respiratory allergic responses and therefore are good candidates for use in our model for detecting environmental chemical respiratory allergens.
Many new chemical substances are produced every day, and chemical-induced allergy has
emerged as a public health problem worldwide [3, 15]. In particular, the inhalation of many types of
chemicals (allergens and irritants) is a leading cause of respiratory diseases [8, 19, 25]. Furthermore, the compounds associated with fine
particulate matter (that is, PM2.5; <2.5 µm aerodynamic diameter)
aggravate respiratory responses to common allergens [13, 18]. Therefore, there is an urgent need
to develop an effective method to identify chemical-induced respiratory allergens [38]. Traditionally, several in vitro and
in vivo detection methods involving various animal species, strains, cell
types, and exposure pathways have been used to identify chemical-induced respiratory allergy
[4, 22, 34], but none of these methods have proven to be
sufficiently sensitive.Previously, in the first phase of our studies, we developed a method for detecting
environmental chemical–related respiratory allergens. Specifically we used typical chemical
sensitizers (i.e., 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene [DNCB], trimellitic anhydride, and toluene
diisocyanate) in a long-term dermal sensitization protocol followed by intratracheal
respiratory challenge of mice [11, 12]. DNCB is a contact allergen, whereas trimellitic
anhydride and toluene diisocyanate are respiratory allergens. In our system, the respiratory
allergens induced prominent increases in several parameters indicative of induced allergic
response, including IgE levels, eosinophilic proliferation, and elevated local (lung airway)
chemokine (MCP-1, MIP-1β, and eotaxin) and cytokine (interleukin [IL]-4, -10, and -13)
levels. In contrast, DNCB sensitization yielded only non-significant increases in each of
these parameters. These results demonstrated that our method can be applied to detect and
classify allergic reactions caused by chemicals present in the environment at weakly
immunogenic and low doses. However, susceptibilities to environmental chemical allergens may
differ between animal species, strains, and exposure routes [29, 43].In the current work, our second phase of studies, we sought to improve our detection
protocol by focusing attention on mouse-strain-associated differences in respiratory
allergic reactions. Specifically we evaluated the BALB/c, NC/Nga, C3H/HeN, C57BL/6N, and
CBA/J strains of mice, which are often used in allergy models, and the chemical respiratory
allergen glutaraldehyde (GA). GA is widely used in the industrial, scientific, and
biomedical fields. For example, GA is the best disinfectant available for cold sterilization
of medical equipment. However, GA is irritating to the skin and respiratory tract and highly
volatile at ambient temperature [2, 42]. These factors contribute to the prevalence of
chronic bronchitis and nasal symptoms in humans [37],
and numerous cases of occupational asthma resulting from GA exposure have been reported
[33]. In addition, GA has often been used in the
development of chemical-induced respiratory allergy models in mice [40].
Method
Animals
Female inbred C57BL/6N, BALB/c, CBA/J, NC/Nga, and C3H/HeN mice (age, 7 weeks) were
purchased from Charles River Japan (Atsugi, Kanagawa, Japan) and acclimated for 6 days
before the start of the experiment. Mice were housed individually under controlled
lighting (lights on from 7:00 to 19:00 h), temperature (22 ± 3°C), humidity (50% ± 20%),
and ventilation (at least 10 complete fresh-air changes hourly). Food (Certified Pellet
Diet MF, Oriental Yeast, Tokyo, Japan) and water were available ad
libitum. The current study was conducted in accordance with the Animal Care and
Use Program of the Institute of Environmental Toxicology (IET IACUC Approval No.
AC12095).Female mice were selected as the model for this study because the OECD Skin Sensitization
Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals [31]
recommend for using female mice. Furthermore, in immunotoxicity studies, only one gender
need be evaluated; in general, females are considered to yield more consistent outcomes
than male animals when evaluating humoral immune responses.
Chemicals
Glutaraldehyde (GA, C5H8O2, 50%) was purchased from
Kanto Chemical Co., Inc. (Tokyo, Japan). Acetone and olive oil were purchased from Wako
Pure Chemical Industries (Osaka, Japan). For dermal sensitization, GA was dissolved in
acetone: olive oil (4:1) to 0.5% (w/v). For inhalation sensitization and challenge, GA was
dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). For intratracheal challenge, GA was
dissolved in PBS.
Local lymph node assay (LLNA)
We conducted an LLNA as a preliminary test to select the concentrations of GA to use in
the main studies. The assay was performed as described by Kimber and Weisenberger [20] and in the OECD Guideline for the Testing of
Chemicals [31], with minor modifications. CBA/J
mouse is a recommended species used for the Local Lymph Node Assay. After a 1-week
acclimation period, CBA/J mice were allocated randomly to dose and control groups (n=3 per
group). A 25-µl aliquot of test solution or solvent only was applied
daily to the dorsum of each ear of each mouse for 3 consecutive days (days 1 through 3).
On day 6, 3H-methyl thymidine (3H-TdR, 20
µCi/animal; specific radioactivity, 1 mCi/ml; PerkinElmer Japan Co.,
Ltd.., Kanagawa, Japan) was injected via the tail vein into all test and control mice; at
5 h after injection, the mice were euthanized by exsanguination from the abdominal aorta
and posterior vena cava under the intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital sodium (75
mg/kg), and the auricular LNs on both sides of each mouse were removed, weighed, and
pooled by mouse in PBS (Life Technologies Co., Ltd.., USA). Single-cell suspensions of LNs
in 5 ml PBS were prepared by passage through sterile 70-µm nylon cell
strainers (Falcon, Tokyo, Japan). The LN cell suspension was washed twice with an excess
of PBS, and the cell pellet was incubated in 3 ml 5% trichloroacetic acid (TCA, Wako Pure
Chemical Industries, Ltd.) at 4°C for approximately 18 h. Each cell pellet was resuspended
in 1 ml TCA and transferred to 9 ml of scintillation fluid (PICO-FLUOR PLUS, PerkinElmer
Japan Co., Ltd.). For each mouse, incorporation of 3H-TdR was measured as
disintegrations per min (DPM) by using a β-scintillation counter (LC-5100, Aloka, Tokyo,
Japan).Stimulation indexes (SIs) and EC3 values were calculated from the 3H-TdR
incorporation data. The SI was calculated by dividing the mean 3H-TdR
incorporation value for each treatment group by that of the solvent control group. The EC3
value is an estimate of the amount of test solution required to induce an SI of 3 [5]. In the standard LLNA, the criterion for a positive
response is an SI of 3 or greater [9, 31].
Experimental protocol
The experimental protocol we used in this study is depicted in Fig. 1. After a 6-day acclimation period, we randomly allocated C57BL/6N, BALB/c, CBA/J,
NC/Nga, and C3H/HeN mice (age, 8 weeks) to groups (n=5 mice per group) for dosing or no
treatment (control). Because our preliminary study revealed that mice sensitized or
challenged with GA only showed much the same pattern of allergic airway inflammatory
responses, as did the intact group, data from similar groups in the current study are not
shown.
Fig. 1.
Experimental protocol and apparatus for inhalation exposure. See Materials and
Methods for a detailed description.
Experimental protocol and apparatus for inhalation exposure. See Materials and
Methods for a detailed description.For sensitization, 0.5% of GA was applied dermally to both ears (25
µl/ear; 50 µl/animal) of each mouse on days 1 through 3,
8 through 10, and 15 through 17. Two weeks after the last sensitization, each mouse was
challenged with 50 µl of 0.05% GA intratracheally on day 31 or with 0.25%
GA by inhalation for 1 h on days 29 through 31. These doses were based on the EC3
concentration determined in our preliminary LLNAs. One day after the last challenge, all
mice (control and treated) were euthanized by exsanguination from the abdominal aorta and
posterior vena cava under the intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital sodium (75
mg/kg). Blood samples were taken from the inferior vena cava, and serum samples were
assayed for total IgE levels. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was collected by
cannulating the trachea and lavaging the lungs 3 times each with 1 ml PBS supplemented
with 1% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS; Life Technologies Co., Ltd.., Tokyo,
Japan). The first BALF fraction from each animal was centrifuged at 350 ×
g for 5 min, these supernatants were pooled respectively, and chemokine
levels were measured. The cell pellets of all three fractions per mouse were resuspended,
pooled by mouse, and centrifuged at 350 × g for 5 min. The supernatants
were removed, and the cell pellets were used for differential cell counts. Hilar lymph
nodes (LNs) from each mouse were pooled in RPMI 1640 medium (Life Technologies Co., Ltd.,
USA). Single-cell suspensions were prepared from LNs by passage through a sterile
70-µm nylon cell strainer in 1 ml RPMI 1640 supplemented with 5% FCS.
Single-cell suspensions were used to analyze the IgE-positive B-cell counts and cytokine
production.
Intratracheal injection
Two weeks after the last sensitization, mice were anesthetized by intraperitoneal
injection of pentobarbital sodium (25 mg/kg), and an challenge with a
50-µl aliquot of 0.05% GA in saline solution was injected into
intratracheal using a 29-G needle.
Inhalation exposure
For the inhaled challenge, mice were exposed to 0.25% GA in PBS mist continuously for 1 h
daily (0.0125 mg/l). The placement of mice in the chamber is shown in Fig. 1. Mice were restrained individually in animal holders (Tokiwa
Kagakukikai Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) attached to a nose-only exposure chamber (total
volume, 31.2 l; Tokiwa Kagakukikai Co., Ltd.) so that only their noses were exposed to the
chemical mist. The mist was generated by an atomizer (Ikeuchi Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan)
using compressed air (ES4AD-5, Kobelco, Tokyo, Japan) and was supplied to the exposure
chamber through an air filter (F3000-10-Y, CKD Corporation, Aichi, Japan). Airflow to the
chamber was controlled at a rate of 20 l/min by using an area flowmeter (NSPO-4, Nippon
Flow Cell, Tokyo, Japan). The chamber air was exhausted through an air filter system
consisting of a glass wool filter, a mist trap, and an activated charcoal filter (Tokiwa
Kagakukikai Co., Ltd.) and was emitted to the atmosphere by using a blower (TFO-K4P,
Hitachi, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The actual concentration, mass median aerodynamic diameter
(MMAD), and geometric standard deviation (GSD) were monitored by gravimetric analysis by
using an air sampler (MF-200, Oct Science Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan) and a mist sampler
(MC-500 sampler, Tokyo Dylec Corp.). The mean values of MMAD and GSD were kept at
approximately 4.0 µm and 2.0, respectively, throughout inhalation
exposure.
Total IgE
Total IgE levels in serum were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (BD OptEIA
Mouse IgE ELISA Set, BD Pharmingen, Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s
protocol.
Flow cytometry of BALF and hilar LN cells
The following antibodies used for flow cytometric analysis were purchased from BD
Pharmingen: fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-mouse IgE (clone R35-72),
phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated hamster anti-mouseCD11c (HL3), FITC-conjugated anti-mouseGr-1 (RB6-8C5), and allo-phycocyanin-conjugated anti-mouseCD45R/B220 (RA3-6B2). To avoid
nonspecific binding, 1 × 106 cells were incubated with 1 µg
Mouse BD Fc Block (BD Pharmingen) for 5 min at 4°C, followed by incubation with monoclonal
antibodies for 30 min at 4°C in the dark. Cells were washed twice with 5% FCS in PBS,
resuspended at 1 × 106 cells per tube in 500 µl PBS, and
analyzed on a FACSVerse flow cytometer (BD Pharmingen) by using the FACSuite program (BD
Pharmingen). To analyse antigen expression, 5000 and 20,000 events were collected from
BALF and LN samples, respectively.
Chemokine levels in BALF
The levels of the chemokines MIP-1β and RANTES were measured by using a cytometric bead
array (BD CBA Mouse Flex Set, BD Pharmingen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Cytokine production from helper T-cells
CD4 positive T-cells (CD4+ T-cells) were isolated from hilar LN cells (1 ×
107 cells) by using autoMACS (Miltenyi Biotec K.K., Tokyo, Japan) and CD4
microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec K. K) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. To stimulate
T-cell receptor signalling, we cultured CD4+ T-cells (1 × 106
cells/well) for 24 or 96 h with Dynabeads Mouse T-Activator CD3/CD28 (25
µg/well) antibodies (Life Technologies Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) in
24-well plates at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. The levels of interferon (IFN)-γ
and IL-4, -13, and -17A in supernatants (cell culture medium) were measured by using a
cytometric bead array (BD CBA Mouse Flex Set, BD Pharmingen) according to the
manufacturer’s protocol.
Statistical analysis
The statistical significance of differences between the control and treatment groups was
determined by using a Student’s t-test. For each test, P
values less than 0.05 were considered significant.
Results
LLNA
To confirm the sensitizing potential of GA, we performed an LLNA in CBA/J mice as a
preliminary test (Fig. 2). When 0.1, 0.25, or 0.5% of GA dissolved in acetone:olive oil was used, both LN
weight and the incorporation of 3H-TdR increased dose-dependently, and SI
values were 1.8, 3.0, and 9.8 times those of the vehicle-control group, respectively.
According to the standard criterion for a positive response (SI ≥3; Dearman et
al. [9]), GA at 0.5% was confirmed to be
a sensitizing agent.
Fig. 2.
(a) Cellular prolification in LLNA (mean ± 1 SD; n=3 per group) (b) Lymph node
weitht (mg; mean ± 1 SD; n=3 per group) in mice with no treatment (0%) and treatment
GA (0.1, 0.25, 0.5%).
(a) Cellular prolification in LLNA (mean ± 1 SD; n=3 per group) (b) Lymph node
weitht (mg; mean ± 1 SD; n=3 per group) in mice with no treatment (0%) and treatment
GA (0.1, 0.25, 0.5%).
IgE responses
To assess the IgE responses, we measured the total IgE levels in serum and the number of
IgE-positive B-cells in the hilar LNs (Fig.
3).
Fig. 3.
(a) Total serum IgE levels (pg/ml; mean ± 1 SD; n=5 per group) and (b) IgE-positive
B-cell counts (mean ± 1 SD; n=5 per group) in mice with no treatment (intact),
dermal sensitization followed by intratracheal challenge with GA (IT), or dermal
sensitization followed by inhaled challenge with GA (IH). Values significantly
different from that of the intact group are indicated by asterisks (*,
P<0.05; **, P<0.01;
t-test).
(a) Total serum IgE levels (pg/ml; mean ± 1 SD; n=5 per group) and (b) IgE-positive
B-cell counts (mean ± 1 SD; n=5 per group) in mice with no treatment (intact),
dermal sensitization followed by intratracheal challenge with GA (IT), or dermal
sensitization followed by inhaled challenge with GA (IH). Values significantly
different from that of the intact group are indicated by asterisks (*,
P<0.05; **, P<0.01;
t-test).The inhalation (IH) challenge group of NC/Ngamice revealed significantly increased total
serum IgE levels (5.69 [P<0.01] times) compared with those of the
respective control group. Treatment groups in other mouse strains showed modest
nonsignificant increases.The number of IgE-positive B-cells of the IT challenge groups of all strains and IH
challenge groups of C3H/HeN and CBA/J tended to be increased, albeit nonsignificantly. In
IH challenge groups of NC/Nga and C57BL/6N, IgE-positive B-cell counts were increased
17.54 times (P<0.05) and 8.12 times (P<0.05)
compared with the respective control group.
BALF analysis
To assess allergic airway inflammation in the lung, we obtained the eosinophil and
neutrophil counts and levels of the chemokine such as MIP-1β and RANTES in BALF (Figs. 4 and 5).
Fig. 4.
Differential cell counts (mean ± 1 SD; n=5 per group) and in BALF of mice with no
treatment (intact), dermal sensitization followed by intratracheal challenge with GA
(IT), or dermal sensitization followed by inhaled challenge with GA (IH). (a)
Representative dot plots showing the gating strategy used to identify different cell
types in BALF. (b) Eosinophil and (c) neutrophil counts. Values significantly
different from that of the intact group are indicated by asterisks (*,
P<0.05; **, P<0.01;
t-test).
Fig. 5.
Differential chemokine levels (pg/ml; mean ± 1 SD; n=5 per group) in BALF of mice
with no treatment (intact), dermal sensitization followed by intratracheal challenge
with GA (IT), or dermal sensitization followed by inhaled challenge with GA (IH).
(a) MIP-1βand (b) RANTES concentrations. Values significantly different from that of
the intact group are indicated by asterisks (*, P<0.05; **,
P<0.01; t-test).
Differential cell counts (mean ± 1 SD; n=5 per group) and in BALF of mice with no
treatment (intact), dermal sensitization followed by intratracheal challenge with GA
(IT), or dermal sensitization followed by inhaled challenge with GA (IH). (a)
Representative dot plots showing the gating strategy used to identify different cell
types in BALF. (b) Eosinophil and (c) neutrophil counts. Values significantly
different from that of the intact group are indicated by asterisks (*,
P<0.05; **, P<0.01;
t-test).Differential chemokine levels (pg/ml; mean ± 1 SD; n=5 per group) in BALF of mice
with no treatment (intact), dermal sensitization followed by intratracheal challenge
with GA (IT), or dermal sensitization followed by inhaled challenge with GA (IH).
(a) MIP-1βand (b) RANTES concentrations. Values significantly different from that of
the intact group are indicated by asterisks (*, P<0.05; **,
P<0.01; t-test).Eosinophil counts were increased (P<0.05) in the IT challenge groups
of C57BL/6N and in the IH challenge group of BALB/c mice (2.49, and 1.72 times,
respectively) compared with those of the respective control group. And those in NC/Nga IT
challenge group tended to be increased, although not significantly. In contrast, the
eosinophil counts of both C3H/HeN challenge groups were comparable to those of the control
groups. Neutrophil counts of all strains IT challenge groups were tended to be increased;
those in BALB/c, NC/Nga, and CBA/J mice (91.55, 96.64, and 82.49 times, respectively) were
particularly high. Neutrophil counts in the IH challenge groups of all strains were
similar to those of the respective control group.The levels of MIP-1β have a tendency to increase in the IT challenge groups of all
strains, especially those of C57BL/6N and CBA/J being significantly high
(P<0.05, 1.59 times and 32.18 times that of the respective control
group). Compared with controls, the levels of RANTES also have a tendency to increase in
all IT challenge groups, particularly those in the CBA/J strain was significantly
increased (P<0.05).
Analysis of hilar LNs
We measured the production of several allergy-related cytokines (IFN-γ and IL-4, -13,
-17A) to assess the allergic reaction in the local (hilar) LNs (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6.
Cytokine production in hilar LN cells. Designations of treatments are as in Fig. 2. The levels of (a) IFNɤ, (b) IL-4, (c)
IL-13, and (d) IL-17A are expressed as mean ± SD (pg/ml; n=5 per group).
Cytokine production in hilar LN cells. Designations of treatments are as in Fig. 2. The levels of (a) IFNɤ, (b) IL-4, (c)
IL-13, and (d) IL-17A are expressed as mean ± SD (pg/ml; n=5 per group).Compared with that in the respective control mice, IFN-γ concentration in the hilar LNs
tended to be increased in IT and IH challenge groups except for C57BL/6N, and was
significantly increased in the IT challenge groups of BALB/c (2.51 times) and CBA/J (11.21
times) mice and the IH challenge group of NC/Ngamice (3.48 times). The hilar LN levels of
IL-4, -13, and 17A tended to be increased in IT and IH challenge groups except for
C3H/HeN. In addition, level of IL-17A in the NC/Nga IH challenge group was 2.37 times
higher than that in the control group, and those of IL-4 and -17A in C57BL/6N mice of the
IH challenge group were higher than that of the respective control group (2.95 and 2.53
times, respectively). In contrast, the control group of C3H/HeN was notably high levels in
allergy-related cytokine levels, and these cytokine levels were no increases those treated
groups of C3H/HeN.
Discussion
In a new method for detecting environmental chemical–related respiratory allergens, we
initially and successfully used our novel long-term sensitization–challenge protocol in
BALB/c mice [11, 12], one of the most popular species and strains used in allergy models and a
known high responder of Th2-mediated immunoreactions [27]. In the current study, we evaluated and compared the airway allergic responses
of the BALB/c, NC/Nga, C3H/HeN, C57BL/6N, and CBA/J strains of mice in our model system
using chemical respiratory allergen glutaraldehyde (GA). These strains are all used
frequently in studies of inflammation, respiratory allergens, and allergy. C57BL/6N strain
mice are Th1 high responders and have been used in several inflammation [36, 39] and
respiratory allergy [29] models. Established as an
inbred strain in 1995, NC/Ngamice originated from Japanese fancy mice [24] and have been useful in models of human atopic
dermatitis and allergic airway inflammation [16]. In
addition, NC/Ngamice demonstrated particularly massive and prolonged allergic responses,
such as eosinophilic inflammation and IgE production, in our previous study [30]. We included CBA/J mice in the current study because
this strain has often been used in LLNAs as a method for identifying potential
skin-sensitizing substances [20, 31]. C3H/HeN mice are a common strain in diverse fields
of research including allergy [43]. In the current
study, we considered C3H/HeN mice to represent the overall moderate responder among the
strains we evaluated.We first confirmed the concentration of GA that yielded a positive response (i.e., EC3
value ≥3) in the LLNA. This test assesses the potential of chemicals to cause a primary
T-lymphocyte proliferative response after topical application of the test chemical to the
skin of mice [9]. Because the LLNA involves dermal
application, strictly speaking, it is appropriate only for assessing the risk of allergic
contact dermatitis. However, Vanoirbeek et al. [41] demonstrated that this test could be used to estimate the “generic”
sensitizing ability of chemicals. For the current study, we therefore adopted a
sensitization dose of 0.5% GA which was equivalent to the EC3 value and a challenge dose of
0.25% GA which was half of the challenge dose. This challenge dose failed to induce a
proliferative response after a single dose but effectively increased the population of LN
cells after multiple doses.To achieve our goal of identifying the optimal mouse strain(s) to use in our model, we
focused on several immune parameters. Among them, IgE antibody plays an important role in
the development of respiratory allergy and can be used as a marker of several
chemical-induced allergies [21]. In addition, in the
development of the allergic response, activated B-cells can act as antigen-presenting cells
for helper T-cells, resulting in hyper-production of IgE [14, 17]. To evaluate the IgE reactions
after sensitization to GA, we measured total IgE in serum and the number of IgE-positive
B-cells in LNs. According to our results, serum IgE levels and IgE-positive B-cells tended
to be increased in the GA-treated groups as compared with the comtrol group of all strains.
Furthermore the particularly strong increases in the serum IgE concentrations of the IH
NC/Ngamice and the markedly elevated IgE-positive B-cell counts in the IH challenge group
of the NC/Ngamice suggest their likely high susceptibility to respiratory allergy. These
upregulations in the NC/Nga strains of mice imply that they are particularly suitable for
use in our model system for identifying and evaluating environmental chemical–related
respiratory allergens. In contrast, B-cell counts were markedy increased in the IH challenge
group of the C57BL/6N mice, but serum IgE concentrations of the treated C57BL/5N groups were
comparable to the control group. Although CBA/J treated groups were increased to serum IgE
level, B-cell counts were comparable to the control group. It is showed that IgE
prosductivity of B-cell in C57BL/6N was lower than other strain, and IgE prosductivity of
B-cell in CBA/J was high. Thus, it is suggested that IgE productivity of B-cell differ with
mice strains.Respiratory allergy is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways that is characterized
by reversible airway observation, airway hyperreactivity, and remodeling of airways.
Infiltration of eosinophils into lung is a fundamental trait of the inflammatory response in
respiratory allergy and may be important in the pathogenesis of this disease [23, 26, 28, 32]. In
addition, eosinophils can release chemokines (MIP-1, RANTES, etc.) as allergy-related
chemical mediators. Neutrophils are also involved in allergic inflammatory reactions [10]. We therefore used flow cytometry to analyze the
eosinophil and neutrophil counts and the levels of allergy-related chemokines (MIP-1β and
RANTES) in BALF. According to our results, these parameters tended to be increased in the IT
challenged groups of BALB/c, NC/Nga, and CBA/J mice and the IH BALB/c mice. These
upregulations in the BALF of BALB/c and NC/Ngamice appeared particularly well correlated
with their IgE reactions.Like IgE and BALF reactions, T-lymphocytes play a pivotal role in the development of
respiratory allergic diseases. The mechanism of chemical-induced respiratory allergy is
dependent on Th2-type cytokines [1]. CD4+
T-cells infiltrate the lung lumen and express a T-helper type 2 (Th2) pattern of cytokines
[1, 43].
Cytokines secreted by these cells, including IL-4 and −13, appear to function in concert
with chemokines and other mediators to recruit and activate the eosinophils of the allergic
inflammatory response [19]. In our current study,
BALB/c, NC/Nga, C57/BL6N, and CBA/J mice showed increased LN production of Th2 (IL-4, -13)
and Th1 (IFN-γ) cytokines compared with control levels. Th1 cytokines are associated with
allergic contact dermatitis [20] and contribute to
allergic airway inflammation [7]. Th17 cells recently
have been shown to produce IL-17A, which is considered to be a pivotal proinflammatory
molecule in respiratory allergy [35]. In our study,
all strains except C3H/HeN showed increased production of IL-17A by LN cells after
challenge, and these increases were particularly pronounced in the IH groups of NC/Nga and
C57BL/6N mice. As described earlier, the upregulations that we noted in the LNs of BALB/c
and NC/Nga may correlate with the IgE and BALF reactions observed. In the control group of
C3H/HeN mice, these cytokine levels were notably high as compared with those of other
strains and were comparable to the treated groups of C3H/HeN mice. According to the
mentioned above, C3H/HeN mice might be inappropriate for use in our model system for
identifying and evaluating environmental chemical–related respiratory allergens because
their high responder of cytokine productions.Overall, the results support the notion that allergic responses differ among exposure
routes and strains of inbred mice (Table
1). Dermal sensitization and intratracheal challenge groups showed high
susceptibility to respiratory allergic inflammation. Although not the actual route for the
introduction of respiratory allergens, intratracheal administration is one of the topical
and directly administration of lung and pulmonary inflammation more directly than does
inhalation exposure, perhaps even causing excessive inflammation [6]. In comparison, IgE and cytokine levels, which are known to be involved
in the development of respiratory allergy, were increased after our inhalation challenge,
which more closely approximates the actual exposure route than does intratracheal
administration. Therefore we suggest that these responses that were induced by inhalation
exposure according to our protocol correspond to real environmental data.
Table 1.
Allergic responses among inbred mouce strains
BALB/c
NC/Nga
C3H/HeN
C57BL/6N
CBA/J
IgE
IT
+
++
+
+
+
IH
++
++
+
+
+
IgE positive B-cell
IT
+
+
-
+
+
IH
-
++
-
++
+
eosinophil
IT
-
+
-
++
++
IH
++
+
-
+
+
neutrophil
IT
+
+
++
++
++
IH
-
-
-
-
-
chemokine
IT
++
+
-
++
+
IH
+
+
-
++
-
cytokine
IT
++
+
-
+
++
IH
+
++
-
++
+
-: comparable to the intact group. +: increase compared with the intact group. ++:
significantly increase compared with the intact group.
-: comparable to the intact group. +: increase compared with the intact group. ++:
significantly increase compared with the intact group.The BALB/c, NC/Nga, C57BL/6N, and CBA/J treatment groups all showed increased allergic
airway inflammation. In addition, the BALB/c and NC/Ngamice showed fairly uniform increases
in all analyses and smaller dispersion than did the other strains. Although C3H/HeN mice
demonstrated markedly increased total IgE levels in serum, the levels of cytokine were
comparable to those of the control groups. Therefore, we propose that the BALB/c and NC/Ngamouse strains are likely to be particularly useful in developing an effective method for
identifying and evaluating environmental respiratory allergens. Our future efforts will
focus on further refining our model system in these two mouse strains.
Authors: Gregory S Whitehead; Julia K L Walker; Katherine G Berman; W Michael Foster; David A Schwartz Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2003-03-07 Impact factor: 5.464
Authors: Chris L Van Hove; Tania Maes; Didier D Cataldo; Maud M Guéders; Els Palmans; Guy F Joos; Kurt G Tournoy Journal: Int Arch Allergy Immunol Date: 2009-02-12 Impact factor: 2.749
Authors: Stephen H Gavett; Najwa Haykal-Coates; Lisa B Copeland; Joachim Heinrich; M Ian Gilmour Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 9.031