Literature DB >> 18662244

Measuring and comparing evolvability and constraint in multivariate characters.

T F Hansen1, D Houle.   

Abstract

The Lande equation forms the basis for our understanding of the short-term evolution of quantitative traits in a multivariate context. It predicts the response to selection as the product of an additive genetic variance matrix and a selection gradient. The selection gradient approximates the force and direction of selection, and the genetic variance matrix quantifies the role of the genetic system in evolution. Attempts to understand the evolutionary significance of the genetic variance matrix are hampered by the fact that the majority of the methods used to characterize and compare variance matrices have not been derived in an explicit theoretical context. We use the Lande equation to derive new measures of the ability of a variance matrix to allow or constrain evolution in any direction in phenotype space. Evolvability captures the ability of a population to evolve in the direction of selection when stabilizing selection is absent. Conditional evolvability captures the ability of a population to respond to directional selection in the presence of stabilizing selection on other trait combinations. We then derive measures of character autonomy and integration from these evolvabilities. We study the properties of these measures and show how they can be used to interpret and compare variance matrices. As an illustration, we show that divergence of wing shape in the dipteran family Drosophilidae has proceeded in directions that have relatively high evolvabilities.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18662244     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01573.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  116 in total

1.  Differences in the temporal dynamics of phenotypic selection among fitness components in the wild.

Authors:  Adam M Siepielski; Joseph D DiBattista; Jeffrey A Evans; Stephanie M Carlson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Evolution of the additive genetic variance-covariance matrix under continuous directional selection on a complex behavioural phenotype.

Authors:  Vincent Careau; Matthew E Wolak; Patrick A Carter; Theodore Garland
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Asymmetric ecological conditions favor Red-Queen type of continued evolution over stasis.

Authors:  Jan Martin Nordbotten; Nils C Stenseth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Independent axes of genetic variation and parallel evolutionary divergence of opercle bone shape in threespine stickleback.

Authors:  Charles B Kimmel; William A Cresko; Patrick C Phillips; Bonnie Ullmann; Mark Currey; Frank von Hippel; Bjarni K Kristjánsson; Ofer Gelmond; Katrina McGuigan
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  The adaptive accuracy of flowers: measurement and microevolutionary patterns.

Authors:  W Scott Armbruster; Thomas F Hansen; Christophe Pélabon; Rocío Pérez-Barrales; Johanne Maad
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 6.  Evolution and evolvability: celebrating Darwin 200.

Authors:  John F Y Brookfield
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Relative contribution of additive, dominance, and imprinting effects to phenotypic variation in body size and growth between divergent selection lines of mice.

Authors:  Reinmar Hager; James M Cheverud; Jason B Wolf
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Characterizing the evolution of genetic variance using genetic covariance tensors.

Authors:  Emma Hine; Stephen F Chenoweth; Howard D Rundle; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Polymorphic genes of major effect: consequences for variation, selection and evolution in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  John R Stinchcombe; Cynthia Weinig; Katy D Heath; Marcus T Brock; Johanna Schmitt
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Genetic regulatory network motifs constrain adaptation through curvature in the landscape of mutational (co)variance.

Authors:  Tyler D Hether; Paul A Hohenlohe
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.