OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of three delivery modalities of Decision-making Education for Choices In Diabetes Everyday (DECIDE), a nine-module, literacy-adapted diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD) education and problem-solving training, compared with an enhanced usual care (UC), on clinical and behavioral outcomes among urban African Americans with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Eligible participants (n = 182) had a suboptimal CVD risk factor profile (A1C, blood pressure, and/or lipids). Participants were randomized to DECIDE Self-Study (n = 46), DECIDE Individual (n = 45), DECIDE Group (n = 46), or Enhanced UC (n = 45). Intervention duration was 18-20 weeks. Outcomes were A1C, blood pressure, lipids, problem-solving, disease knowledge, and self-care activities, all measured at baseline, 1 week, and 6 months after completion of the intervention. RESULTS: DECIDE modalities and Enhanced UC did not significantly differ in clinical outcomes at 6 months postintervention. In participants with A1C ≥7.5% (58 mmol/mol) at baseline, A1C declined in each DECIDE modality at 1 week postintervention (P < 0.05) and only in Self-Study at 6 months postintervention (b = -0.24, P < 0.05). There was significant reduction in systolic blood pressure in Self-Study (b = -4.04) and Group (b = -3.59) at 6 months postintervention. Self-Study, Individual, and Enhanced UC had significant declines in LDL and Self-Study had an increase in HDL (b = 1.76, P < 0.05) at 6 months postintervention. Self-Study and Individual had a higher increase in knowledge than Enhanced UC (P < 0.05), and all arms improved in problem-solving (P < 0.01) at 6 months postintervention. CONCLUSIONS: DECIDE modalities showed benefits after intervention. Self-Study demonstrated robust improvements across clinical and behavioral outcomes, suggesting program suitability for broader dissemination to populations with similar educational and literacy levels.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of three delivery modalities of Decision-making Education for Choices In Diabetes Everyday (DECIDE), a nine-module, literacy-adapted diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD) education and problem-solving training, compared with an enhanced usual care (UC), on clinical and behavioral outcomes among urban African Americans with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Eligible participants (n = 182) had a suboptimal CVD risk factor profile (A1C, blood pressure, and/or lipids). Participants were randomized to DECIDE Self-Study (n = 46), DECIDE Individual (n = 45), DECIDE Group (n = 46), or Enhanced UC (n = 45). Intervention duration was 18-20 weeks. Outcomes were A1C, blood pressure, lipids, problem-solving, disease knowledge, and self-care activities, all measured at baseline, 1 week, and 6 months after completion of the intervention. RESULTS: DECIDE modalities and Enhanced UC did not significantly differ in clinical outcomes at 6 months postintervention. In participants with A1C ≥7.5% (58 mmol/mol) at baseline, A1C declined in each DECIDE modality at 1 week postintervention (P < 0.05) and only in Self-Study at 6 months postintervention (b = -0.24, P < 0.05). There was significant reduction in systolic blood pressure in Self-Study (b = -4.04) and Group (b = -3.59) at 6 months postintervention. Self-Study, Individual, and Enhanced UC had significant declines in LDL and Self-Study had an increase in HDL (b = 1.76, P < 0.05) at 6 months postintervention. Self-Study and Individual had a higher increase in knowledge than Enhanced UC (P < 0.05), and all arms improved in problem-solving (P < 0.01) at 6 months postintervention. CONCLUSIONS: DECIDE modalities showed benefits after intervention. Self-Study demonstrated robust improvements across clinical and behavioral outcomes, suggesting program suitability for broader dissemination to populations with similar educational and literacy levels.
Authors: Margaret A Powers; Joan Bardsley; Marjorie Cypress; Paulina Duker; Martha M Funnell; Amy Hess Fischl; Melinda D Maryniuk; Linda Siminerio; Eva Vivian Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2015-06-05 Impact factor: 4.910
Authors: Sherita Hill Golden; Arleen Brown; Jane A Cauley; Marshall H Chin; Tiffany L Gary-Webb; Catherine Kim; Julie Ann Sosa; Anne E Sumner; Blair Anton Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2012-06-22 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Felicia Hill-Briggs; Mariana Lazo; Mark Peyrot; Angela Doswell; Yi-Ting Chang; Martha N Hill; David Levine; Nae-Yuh Wang; Frederick L Brancati Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2011-03-29 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: David J Hyman; Valory N Pavlik; Anthony J Greisinger; Wenyaw Chan; Jose Bayona; Carol Mansyur; Victor Simms; James Pool Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2011-10-27 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Liliana E Pezzin; Penny H Feldman; Jennifer M Mongoven; Margaret V McDonald; Linda M Gerber; Timothy R Peng Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2010-10-13 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Tiffany L Gary; Marian Batts-Turner; Hsin-Chieh Yeh; Felicia Hill-Briggs; Lee R Bone; Nae-Yuh Wang; David M Levine; Neil R Powe; Christopher D Saudek; Martha N Hill; Maura McGuire; Frederick L Brancati Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2009-10-26
Authors: Christa L Lilly; Lucinda L Bryant; Janie M Leary; Maihan B Vu; Felicia Hill-Briggs; Carmen D Samuel-Hodge; Colleen R McMilin; Thomas C Keyserling Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2014-03-06 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Na Shin; Felicia Hill-Briggs; Susan Langan; Jennifer L Payne; Constantine Lyketsos; Sherita Hill Golden Journal: J Diabetes Complications Date: 2017-02-12 Impact factor: 2.852
Authors: Stephanie L Fitzpatrick; Dea Papajorgji-Taylor; Jennifer L Schneider; Nangel Lindberg; Melanie Francisco; Ning Smith; Katie Vaughn; Elizabeth A Vrany; Felicia Hill-Briggs Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2022-07-18 Impact factor: 3.626
Authors: Janet Jull; Sascha Köpke; Maureen Smith; Meg Carley; Jeanette Finderup; Anne C Rahn; Laura Boland; Sandra Dunn; Andrew A Dwyer; Jürgen Kasper; Simone Maria Kienlin; France Légaré; Krystina B Lewis; Anne Lyddiatt; Claudia Rutherford; Junqiang Zhao; Tamara Rader; Ian D Graham; Dawn Stacey Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-11-08