BACKGROUND: Lower socioeconomic status is associated with excess disease burden from diabetes. Diabetes self-management support interventions are needed that are effective in engaging lower income patients, addressing competing life priorities and barriers to self-care, and facilitating behavior change. OBJECTIVE: To pilot test feasibility, acceptability, and effect on disease control of a problem-based diabetes self-management training adapted for low literacy and accessibility. DESIGN: Two-arm randomized controlled trial powered to detect a 0.50% change in A1C at follow-up with a 2-sided alpha of 0.05 in a pooled analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-six urban African-American patients with type 2 diabetes and suboptimal blood sugar, blood pressure, or cholesterol control recruited from a diabetes registry within a university-affiliated managed care organization. INTERVENTIONS: A group, problem-based diabetes self-management training designed for delivery in an intensive and a condensed program format. Three intensive and three condensed program groups were conducted during the trial. MAIN MEASURES: Clinical (A1C, systolic blood pressure [SBP], diastolic blood pressure [DBP], LDL and HDL cholesterol) and behavioral (knowledge, problem solving, self-management behavior) data were measured at baseline, post-intervention, and 3 months post-intervention (corresponding with 6-9 months following baseline). RESULTS: Adoption of both programs was high (>85% attendance rates, 95% retention). At 3 months post-intervention, the between-group difference in A1C change was -0.72% (p = 0.02), in favor of the intensive program. A1C reduction was partially mediated by problem-solving skill at follow-up (ß = -0.13, p = 0.04). Intensive program patients demonstrated within-group improvements in knowledge (p < 0.001), problem-solving (p = 0.01), and self-management behaviors (p = 0.04). Among the subsets of patients with suboptimal blood pressure or lipids at baseline, the intensive program yielded clinically significant individual improvements in SBP, DBP, and LDL cholesterol. Patient satisfaction and usability ratings were high for both programs. CONCLUSIONS: A literacy-adapted, intensive, problem-solving-based diabetes self-management training was effective for key clinical and behavioral outcomes in a lower income patient sample.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Lower socioeconomic status is associated with excess disease burden from diabetes. Diabetes self-management support interventions are needed that are effective in engaging lower income patients, addressing competing life priorities and barriers to self-care, and facilitating behavior change. OBJECTIVE: To pilot test feasibility, acceptability, and effect on disease control of a problem-based diabetes self-management training adapted for low literacy and accessibility. DESIGN: Two-arm randomized controlled trial powered to detect a 0.50% change in A1C at follow-up with a 2-sided alpha of 0.05 in a pooled analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-six urban African-American patients with type 2 diabetes and suboptimal blood sugar, blood pressure, or cholesterol control recruited from a diabetes registry within a university-affiliated managed care organization. INTERVENTIONS: A group, problem-based diabetes self-management training designed for delivery in an intensive and a condensed program format. Three intensive and three condensed program groups were conducted during the trial. MAIN MEASURES: Clinical (A1C, systolic blood pressure [SBP], diastolic blood pressure [DBP], LDL and HDL cholesterol) and behavioral (knowledge, problem solving, self-management behavior) data were measured at baseline, post-intervention, and 3 months post-intervention (corresponding with 6-9 months following baseline). RESULTS: Adoption of both programs was high (>85% attendance rates, 95% retention). At 3 months post-intervention, the between-group difference in A1C change was -0.72% (p = 0.02), in favor of the intensive program. A1C reduction was partially mediated by problem-solving skill at follow-up (ß = -0.13, p = 0.04). Intensive program patients demonstrated within-group improvements in knowledge (p < 0.001), problem-solving (p = 0.01), and self-management behaviors (p = 0.04). Among the subsets of patients with suboptimal blood pressure or lipids at baseline, the intensive program yielded clinically significant individual improvements in SBP, DBP, and LDL cholesterol. Patient satisfaction and usability ratings were high for both programs. CONCLUSIONS: A literacy-adapted, intensive, problem-solving-based diabetes self-management training was effective for key clinical and behavioral outcomes in a lower income patient sample.
Authors: Tiffany L Gary; Jeanine M Genkinger; Eliseo Guallar; Mark Peyrot; Frederick L Brancati Journal: Diabetes Educ Date: 2003 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.140
Authors: Felicia Hill-Briggs; Tiffany L Gary; Martha N Hill; Lee R Bone; Frederick L Brancati Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Heather J Cole-Lewis; Arlene M Smaldone; Patricia R Davidson; Rita Kukafka; Jonathan N Tobin; Andrea Cassells; Elizabeth D Mynatt; George Hripcsak; Lena Mamykina Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2015-08-08 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: J A Green; P L Ephraim; F F Hill-Briggs; T Browne; T S Strigo; C L Hauer; R A Stametz; J D Darer; U D Patel; K Lang-Lindsey; B L Bankes; S A Bolden; P Danielson; S Ruff; L Schmidt; A Swoboda; P Woods; B Vinson; D Littlewood; G Jackson; J F Pendergast; J St Clair Russell; K Collins; E Norfolk; I D Bucaloiu; S Kethireddy; C Collins; D Davis; J dePrisco; D Malloy; C J Diamantidis; S Fulmer; J Martin; D Schatell; N Tangri; A Sees; C Siegrist; J Breed; A Medley; E Graboski; J Billet; M Hackenberg; D Singer; S Stewart; A Alkon; N A Bhavsar; L Lewis-Boyer; C Martz; C Yule; R C Greer; M Saunders; B Cameron; L E Boulware Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Patti L Ephraim; Felicia Hill-Briggs; Debra L Roter; Lee R Bone; Jennifer L Wolff; LaPricia Lewis-Boyer; David M Levine; Hanan J Aboumatar; Lisa A Cooper; Stephanie J Fitzpatrick; Kimberly A Gudzune; Michael C Albert; Dwyan Monroe; Michelle Simmons; Debra Hickman; Leon Purnell; Annette Fisher; Richard Matens; Gary J Noronha; Peter J Fagan; Hema C Ramamurthi; Jessica M Ameling; Jeanne Charlston; Tanyka S Sam; Kathryn A Carson; Nae-Yuh Wang; Deidra C Crews; Raquel C Greer; Valerie Sneed; Sarah J Flynn; Nicole DePasquale; L Ebony Boulware Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2014-06-21 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: L Ebony Boulware; Patti L Ephraim; Felicia Hill-Briggs; Debra L Roter; Lee R Bone; Jennifer L Wolff; LaPricia Lewis-Boyer; David M Levine; Raquel C Greer; Deidra C Crews; Kimberly A Gudzune; Michael C Albert; Hema C Ramamurthi; Jessica M Ameling; Clemontina A Davenport; Hui-Jie Lee; Jane F Pendergast; Nae-Yuh Wang; Kathryn A Carson; Valerie Sneed; Debra J Gayles; Sarah J Flynn; Dwyan Monroe; Debra Hickman; Leon Purnell; Michelle Simmons; Annette Fisher; Nicole DePasquale; Jeanne Charleston; Hanan J Aboutamar; Ashley N Cabacungan; Lisa A Cooper Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-11-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Stephanie L Fitzpatrick; Sherita Hill Golden; Kerry Stewart; June Sutherland; Sharie DeGross; Tina Brown; Nae-Yuh Wang; Jerilyn Allen; Lisa A Cooper; Felicia Hill-Briggs Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Miyong T Kim; Kim B Kim; Boyun Huh; Tam Nguyen; Hae-Ra Han; Lee R Bone; David Levine Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2015-07-14 Impact factor: 5.043