Literature DB >> 27878545

Probability of foliar injury for Acer sp. based on foliar fluoride concentrations.

Andrew M McDonough1, Murray J Dixon2, Debbie T Terry2, Aaron K Todd2, Michael A Luciani2, Michele L Williamson2, Danuta S Roszak2, Kim A Farias2.   

Abstract

Fluoride is considered one of the most phytotoxic elements to plants, and indicative fluoride injury has been associated over a wide range of foliar fluoride concentrations. The aim of this study was to determine the probability of indicative foliar fluoride injury based on Acer sp. foliar fluoride concentrations using a logistic regression model. Foliage from Acer nedundo, Acer saccharinum, Acer saccharum and Acer platanoides was collected along a distance gradient from three separate brick manufacturing facilities in southern Ontario as part of a long-term monitoring programme between 1995 and 2014. Hydrogen fluoride is the major emission source associated with the manufacturing facilities resulting with highly elevated foliar fluoride close to the facilities and decreasing with distance. Consistent with other studies, indicative fluoride injury was observed over a wide range of foliar concentrations (9.9-480.0 μg F- g-1). The logistic regression model was statistically significant for the Acer sp. group, A. negundo and A. saccharinum; consequently, A. negundo being the most sensitive species among the group. In addition, A. saccharum and A. platanoides were not statistically significant within the model. We are unaware of published foliar fluoride values for Acer sp. within Canada, and this research provides policy maker and scientist with probabilities of indicative foliar injury for common urban Acer sp. trees that can help guide decisions about emissions controls. Further research should focus on mechanisms driving indicative fluoride injury over wide ranging foliar fluoride concentrations and help determine foliar fluoride thresholds for damage.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fluoride; Foliage; Impacts; Logistic regression; Monitoring; Ontario

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27878545     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-016-5672-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  19 in total

Review 1.  Monitoring complex bacterial communities using culture-independent molecular techniques: application to soil environment.

Authors:  L Ranjard; F Poly; S Nazaret
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.992

2.  Nematode community structure as a bioindicator in environmental monitoring.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Definitions and principles for bioindication and biomonitoring of trace metals in the environment.

Authors:  Bernd Markert
Journal:  J Trace Elem Med Biol       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 3.849

4.  Role of nematodes in soil health and their use as indicators.

Authors:  D A Neher
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.402

5.  Effects of fluoride emissions on two tropical grasses: Chloris gayana and Panicum maximum cv. Colonião.

Authors:  Armando Molina Divan Junior; Marco Antonio Oliva; Carlos Alberto Martinez; José Cambraia
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 6.291

6.  Determining Photosynthetic Parameters from Leaf CO2 Exchange and Chlorophyll Fluorescence (Ribulose-1,5-Bisphosphate Carboxylase/Oxygenase Specificity Factor, Dark Respiration in the Light, Excitation Distribution between Photosystems, Alternative Electron Transport Rate, and Mesophyll Diffusion Resistance.

Authors:  A. Laisk; F. Loreto
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Fluoride accumulation in soil and vegetation in the vicinity of brick fields.

Authors:  S K Jha; A K Nayak; Y K Sharma; V K Mishra; D K Sharma
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 2.151

8.  Native plant species suitable as bioindicators and biomonitors for airborne fluoride.

Authors:  Leonard H Weinstein; Alan W Davison
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 8.071

Review 9.  Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis.

Authors:  Thomas Vogt
Journal:  Mol Plant       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 13.164

10.  Statistics review 14: Logistic regression.

Authors:  Viv Bewick; Liz Cheek; Jonathan Ball
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2005-01-13       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.