Literature DB >> 12804822

Native plant species suitable as bioindicators and biomonitors for airborne fluoride.

Leonard H Weinstein1, Alan W Davison.   

Abstract

For 30-40 years airborne fluoride, usually in the form of HF or SiF4, was one of the most important and damaging air pollutants affecting forests, crops and natural vegetation. It is much more toxic than most other air pollutants such as O3 or SO2 because injury to the most sensitive species begins when they are exposed to a concentration below 1 ppb (ca. 0.8 microg m(-3)) for a 1- to 3-day period. The long-term threshold concentration is around 0.25-0.30 microg m(-3). Higher concentrations and longer durations of exposure induce much more rapid and extensive injury. However, there is a difference in sensitivity between the most and least sensitive species of around 2-3 orders of magnitude and most species possess a degree of resistance. Dramatic improvements in engineering technology have greatly reduced emissions but because of the high toxicity, cases of vegetation injury are still common, even in developed countries, and cases involving litigation still occur. Therefore there is a continuing need for bioindicators and biomonitoring of fluorides, so this paper reviews the subject, drawing attention to the strengths and limitations of the techniques. Visible symptoms are described and illustrated and tables of relative sensitivity are given and their limitations discussed. Finally, examples of biomonitoring in Europe and the USA are presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12804822     DOI: 10.1016/s0269-7491(03)00090-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  7 in total

1.  Probability of foliar injury for Acer sp. based on foliar fluoride concentrations.

Authors:  Andrew M McDonough; Murray J Dixon; Debbie T Terry; Aaron K Todd; Michael A Luciani; Michele L Williamson; Danuta S Roszak; Kim A Farias
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Interspecific variation in the diets of herbivores in an industrial environment: implications for exposure to fluoride emissions.

Authors:  Naomi E Davis; Clare E Death; Graeme Coulson; Lora Newby; Jasmin Hufschmid
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Tolerance strategies of two Mediterranean native xerophytes under fluoride pollution in Tunisia.

Authors:  Asma Boukhris; Isabelle Laffont-Schwob; Hélène Folzer; Jacques Rabier; Imed Mezghani; Marie-Dominique Salducci; Thierry Tatoni; Mohamed Chaieb
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Rapid quantitative assessment of visible injury to vegetation and visual amenity effects of fluoride air pollution.

Authors:  D Doley
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Assessment of Fluoride Concentration of Soil and Vegetables in Vicinity of Zinc Smelter, Debari, Udaipur, Rajasthan.

Authors:  Nagesh Bhat; Sandeep Jain; Kailash Asawa; Mridula Tak; Kushal Shinde; Anukriti Singh; Neha Gandhi; Vivek Vardhan Gupta
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-10-01

6.  Effect of soil contamination with fluorine on the yield and content of nitrogen forms in the biomass of crops.

Authors:  Radosław Szostek; Zdzisław Ciećko
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 7.  Chemical Aspects of Human and Environmental Overload with Fluorine.

Authors:  Jianlin Han; Loránd Kiss; Haibo Mei; Attila Márió Remete; Maja Ponikvar-Svet; Daniel Mark Sedgwick; Raquel Roman; Santos Fustero; Hiroki Moriwaki; Vadim A Soloshonok
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 60.622

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.