Literature DB >> 27878310

Moving from vaginal hysterectomy to "no-incision" hysterectomy: how terminology has an impact.

Michael Moen1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2016        PMID： 27878310     DOI： 10.1007/s00192-016-3205-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN： 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  The increasing use of robot-assisted approach for hysterectomy results in decreasing rates of abdominal hysterectomy and traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  Noam Smorgick; Kristin E Patzkowsky; Mark R Hoffman; Arnold P Advincula; Arleen H Song; Sawsan As-Sanie
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  FINHYST 2006--national prospective 1-year survey of 5,279 hysterectomies.

Authors:  Tea H I Brummer; Jyrki Jalkanen; Jaana Fraser; Anna-Mari Heikkinen; Minna Kauko; Juha Mäkinen; Ulla Puistola; Jari Sjöberg; Eija Tomás; Päivi Härkki
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.

Authors:  Carolyn W Swenson; Neil S Kamdar; John A Harris; Shitanshu Uppal; Darrell A Campbell; Daniel M Morgan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Thomas J Herzog; Jennifer Tsui; Cande V Ananth; Sharyn N Lewin; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  A series of 3190 laparoscopic hysterectomies for benign disease from 1990 to 2006: evaluation of complications compared with vaginal and abdominal procedures.

Authors:  O Donnez; P Jadoul; J Squifflet; J Donnez
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 6.531
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.