Literature DB >> 23839534

The increasing use of robot-assisted approach for hysterectomy results in decreasing rates of abdominal hysterectomy and traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Noam Smorgick1, Kristin E Patzkowsky, Mark R Hoffman, Arnold P Advincula, Arleen H Song, Sawsan As-Sanie.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the frequency of minimally invasive surgical approach to hysterectomy between two time periods, during which the use of the robotic technique has rapidly increased.
METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of 623 consecutive patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign indications at the Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery via laparoscopic, robotic, laparotomy, mini-laparotomy and vaginal approaches from July 2004 to June 2010. "Early period" refers to the first 311 patients, and "late period" refers to the remaining 312 patients.
RESULTS: The characteristics of patients from the early and late periods were comparable in terms of age, BMI and uterine weight. The rates of hysterectomy by laparotomy, traditional laparoscopy, robotic, vaginal, and mini-laparotomy were significantly different between the early and late periods (17.7 to 5.4%, 39.5 to 17.6%, 23.8 to 64.1%, 5.8 to 4.8% and 13.2 to 8%, respectively, P < 0.01), with the overall rates of hysterectomies completed via a minimally invasive approach increasing from 82.3 to 94.6%, respectively (P < 0.01). There were no differences in surgical complications between the two periods.
CONCLUSION: Increased utilization of a robotic approach to hysterectomy correlates with decreasing rates of abdominal hysterectomy concurrent with decreasing rates of traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy. This shift in surgical approach to hysterectomy, while beneficial in increasing the rates of minimally invasive approach to hysterectomy, may have significant economic implications due to the higher cost of robotic surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23839534     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-013-2948-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  5 in total

1.  Moving from vaginal hysterectomy to "no-incision" hysterectomy: how terminology has an impact.

Authors:  Michael Moen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Health resource utilization and costs during the first 90 days following robot-assisted hysterectomy.

Authors:  Vani Dandolu; Prathamesh Pathak
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Minimally invasive specialists and rates of laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  Megan Loring; Stephanie N Morris; Keith B Isaacson
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Robotic Hysterectomy for Benign Indications: What Have We Learned from a Decade?

Authors:  Marie Carbonnel; Gaby N Moawad; Mia Maria Tarazi; Aurelie Revaux; Titouan Kennel; Angéline Favre-Inhofer; Jean Marc Ayoubi
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

5.  Robotic single-site supracervical hysterectomy with manual morcellation: Preliminary experience.

Authors:  Dah-Ching Ding; Mun-Kun Hong; Tang-Yuan Chu; Yu-Hsun Chang; Hwan-Wun Liu
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 1.337

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.