Literature DB >> 27878067

Ultrasonography Findings of AlloDerm® Used in Postmastectomy Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Young Seon Kim1.   

Abstract

AlloDerm® (LifeCell Corp.; Brancburg, NJ) is an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) that serves as an immunologically inert scaffold in plastic surgery. In breast reconstruction, it is used as a filler for lumpectomy defects and can be used to create the inferolateral portion of the tissue expander pocket or implant pocket in postmastectomy patients. However, there are limited reports of the radiologic findings of AlloDerm® in patients who have undergone postmastectomy reconstruction. Familiarity with the imaging features of AlloDerm® is essential for correct diagnosis. We report the ultrasonography features of AlloDerm® in a 43-year-old female patient 3 months after postmastectomy reconstruction. It may help distinguish AlloDerm® from tumor recurrence or other foreign body materials such as gossypiboma. This is important as misdiagnosis can often lead to unnecessary surgical intervention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alloderm®; Breast Reconstruction; Mastectomy; Ultrasonography

Year:  2016        PMID: 27878067      PMCID: PMC5110931          DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.38252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Radiol        ISSN: 1735-1065            Impact factor:   0.212


1. Introduction

AlloDerm® (LifeCell Corp.; Brancburg, NJ) is an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) obtained from cadaveric human skin that has been processed to remove all antigenic epitopes and cells, resulting in an immunologically inert scaffold (1-3). The remaining dermal matrix contains collagen, elastin, hyaluronic acid, fibronectin, proteoglycans, growth factor receptors and vascular channels, which allow for host cell migration and angiogenesis (1, 3, 4). AlloDerm® has previously been used in breast reconstruction (5, 6), abdominal hernia repair (7-9), pelvic reconstruction (10, 11), as well as head and neck contouring and reconstruction (12, 13). In current practice, AlloDerm® has become increasingly popular in plastic surgery, particularly breast reconstruction (1). It is used as a filler for lumpectomy defects (2, 3) and can be used to create the inferolateral portion of the tissue expander pocket or implant pocket in postmastectomy patients (1, 6). However thus far, only a small number of reports have described the radiologic findings of AlloDerm® in postmastectomy reconstruction patients (2, 3, 14). This poses a diagnostic challenge, as radiologists may be unfamiliar with the imaging features of AlloDerm®. Buck et al. reported the case of a patient with a new palpable mass in her breast after mastectomy (15). After surgical excision, it was confirmed to be a foreign body giant cell infiltration, secondary to the ADM used in reconstruction (15). We herein report the ultrasonography features of AlloDerm® in a 43-year-old female patient, 3 months after postmastectomy reconstruction. Enhanced characterization of this finding may help in distinguishing it from tumor recurrence or other foreign body material such as gossypiboma. This is important as misdiagnosis can often lead to unnecessary surgical intervention.

2. Case Presentation

A 43-year-old woman, who underwent left skin-sparing mastectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ 2 years before and delayed reconstruction 3 months before presentation, developed a palpable mass along the lower lateral aspects of her reconstructed left breast. Signs and symptoms suggesting inflammation, such as fever, tenderness, localized warmth or redness were not present. A targeted ultrasound examination was performed, and a 1.7 × 0.7 × 3.3 centimeter mass with smooth margins observed at the lower lateral aspect of the left breast, along the superficial margin of implant (Figure 1A). It appeared oval-shaped on transverse view (Figure 1A), whereas on the longitudinal view, it had a folded, sheet like structure (Figure 1B). The lesion did not show vascularity on color Doppler imaging (Figure 1C). A left mediolateral oblique view (MLO) mammography demonstrated a band-like lesion at the lower aspect of the reconstructed left breast. The palpable area of concern (marked with BB marker on skin) was isodense to the surrounding glandular tissue (Figure 1D). On simple chest radiography, a band-like structure was demonstrated overlapping her reconstructed left breast (Figure 1E). This was not seen on her previous chest radiograph, performed prior to the reconstruction surgery (Figure 1F). Non-enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the chest demonstrated an oval-shaped lesion with soft tissue density along the superficial aspect of the implant (Figure 1G). After discussion with the plastic surgeon, this location and configuration was identified as consistent with the AlloDerm® sling used in reconstruction surgery. Therefore, our final assessment was Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 2 (benign finding). The patient is currently doing well without evidence of recurrence of breast cancer.
Figure 1.

A 43-year-old woman with left mastectomy and reconstruction with implant. A - C, Ultrasonography demonstrates an isoechoic mass with smooth margin at left lower outer breast along the superficial margin of implant. It was oval-shaped on transverse view, and a folded, sheet-like structure on longitudinal view, the lesion did not show vascularity on color Doppler imaging; D, Left MLO demonstrated an isodense, band-like structure at the location of concern (marked with BB marker on skin); E, On chest radiographs, a radiopaque band-like structure was demonstrated overlapping the reconstructed left breast (annotated with arrow); It was not shown on the previous chest radiograph, performed prior to reconstruction surgery (F); G, Non-enhanced computed tomography of the chest demonstrated an oval shaped, lesion with soft tissue density along the superficial aspect of implant.

3. Discussion

There are many different options for postmastectomy breast reconstruction. However, the application of ADM has become one of the main options for implant-based breast reconstruction (16). ADM has many benefits over the traditional submuscular technique. These include, enhanced lower pole expansion, easier definition of the inframammary fold (IMF), a reduction in postoperative pain, and improved cosmetic outcomes (5, 6, 15, 16). Thus, its use in breast reconstruction has become increasingly popular. In postmastectomy patients, the pectoralis major muscles frequently provide insufficient inferolateral coverage for the tissue expander or implant, especially in thin women (5). The AlloDerm® sling technique was first introduced by Breuing and Warren in 2005 (5). AlloDerm® is sewn to the inferior edge of the pectoralis major muscle and along the chest wall at the location of the inframammary fold, creating a subpectoral-sub-AlloDerm® pocket (5). When placed at a well-vascularized surface, AlloDerm® incorporates into the host tissue, forming a new matrix for tissue regeneration (17, 18). Imaging studies after breast reconstruction with AlloDerm® are usually performed for diagnostic evaluation of postoperative complication, clinical concern of palpability, or pain. It may be diagnostically challenging for radiologists, if they are unfamiliar with the imaging appearance of AlloDerm® used in breast reconstruction. Buck et al. reported the case of a patient with a new palpable mass in her breast after mastectomy (15). After surgical excision, it was confirmed to be a foreign body giant cell infiltration, secondary to the ADM used in reconstruction (15). However, few reports exist describing the radiologic findings of AlloDerm® cases of postmastectomy reconstruction (2, 3, 14). On mammography, AlloDerm® is isodense to glandular tissue without obscuring calcifications and it may resemble postoperative changes, seromas, or hematomas (2, 3). Tran Cao et al. described an ultrasound feature of AlloDerm® in the setting of seroma, as an echogenic band with posterior acoustic shadowing (2). Additionally, Lee et al. described an ultrasound of AlloDerm® use in postmastectomy reconstruction, as multiple isoechoic, vague parallel hypoechoic to isoechoic masses with smooth margins, with and without color flow (3). They suggested that the variability of sonographic features could reflect the continuum of vascularization and incorporation of AlloDerm® into the host (3). AlloDerm® also showed variable appearance on MRI (2, 3, 14); iso-signal intensity to glandular tissue on non fat-saturated T1-weighted image, and hypersignal intensity on fat-saturated T2-weighted image with non- to mild enhancement on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Enhanced radiologic characterization of AlloDerm® may help in distinguishing it from tumor recurrence, postoperative change, fat necrosis, abscess or other foreign body material such as a gossypiboma. Careful correlation with the operative record and discussion with the surgeon may also be helpful in aiding a diagnosis. This is important in preventing a misdiagnosis and potentially unnecessary surgical intervention.
  18 in total

1.  AlloDerm for dorsal nasal irregularities.

Authors:  I T Jackson; R Yavuzer
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Acellular cadaveric dermis (AlloDerm): a new alternative for abdominal hernia repair.

Authors:  Brian Buinewicz; Brent Rosen
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.539

3.  Two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction using AlloDerm including outcomes of different timings of radiotherapy.

Authors:  Scott L Spear; Mitchel Seruya; Samir S Rao; Steven Rottman; Ellen Stolle; Michael Cohen; Kirsten M Rose; Pranay M Parikh; Maurice Y Nahabedian
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Updated Evidence of Acellular Dermal Matrix Use for Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kyeong-Tae Lee; Goo-Hyun Mun
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Reconstruction of pharyngeal defects using AlloDerm and sternocleidomastoid muscle flap.

Authors:  U K Sinha; K E Chang; C W Shih
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Diagnostic dilemma: acellular dermis mimicking a breast mass after immediate tissue expander breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Donald W Buck; Kamaldeep Heyer; Jeffrey D Wayne; Anjana Yeldandi; John Y S Kim
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 7.  The biology of biologics: basic science and clinical concepts.

Authors:  Yuri W Novitsky; Michael J Rosen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Pelvic, abdominal, and chest wall reconstruction with AlloDerm in patients at increased risk for mesh-related complications.

Authors:  Charles E Butler; Howard N Langstein; Steven J Kronowitz
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  A preliminary report on the clinical experience with AlloDerm in breast reconstruction and its radiologic appearance.

Authors:  Hop S Tran Cao; Christopher Tokin; Jason Konop; Haydee Ojeda-Fournier; James Chao; Sarah L Blair
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 0.688

10.  Vaginal paravaginal repair with an AlloDerm graft.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Clemons; Deborah L Myers; Vivian C Aguilar; Lily A Arya
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  3 in total

1.  Imaging features of volume replacement using an acellular dermal matrix in oncoplastic breast conserving surgery: A case report.

Authors:  Chae Bin Lee; Young-Seon Kim; Seung Eun Lee
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2022-04-13

2.  Abnormal Ultrasonographic Findings of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Correlations with Histopathology.

Authors:  Young Seon Kim; Won Seob Lee; Bo-Yoon Park; Manki Choi; Jun Ho Lee; Young Kyung Bae; Il-Kug Kim
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation: Acellular Dermal Matrix (Alloderm®) Used in Breast Reconstructive Surgery.

Authors:  Christine U Lee; Aleh Bobr; Jorge Torres-Mora
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2017-03-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.